Revista Latina de Comunicación Social. ISSN 1138-5820

 

Longitudinal analysis of Instagram use in Spanish universities

 

Enara Zarrabeitia-Bilbao

University of the Basque Country. Spain.

enara.zarrabeitia@ehu.eus

 

 

Izaskun Alvarez-Meaza

University of the Basque Country. Spain.

izaskun.alvarez@ehu.eus

 

 

Rosa María Río-Belver

University of the Basque Country. Spain.

rosamaria.rio@ehu.eus

 

 

Funding: This research received funding from the T4BSS (Technology for Business, Society and Sustainability) Basque Government consolidated research group (IT1691-22).


How to cite this article / Standard reference

Zarrabeitia-Bilbao, Enara; Alvarez-Meaza, Izaskun & Rio-Belver, Rosa María (2026). Longitudinal analysis of Instagram use in Spanish universities. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 84, 1-29. https://www.doi.org/10.4185/rlcs-2026-2518


Date of Receipt: May 14, 2025
Date of Acceptance: August 13, 2025
Date of Publication: October 16, 2025


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Universities need to strengthen their brand image by initiating a transformation that incorporates new means of communication. Digital social media, as fast and effective channels for communication and dissemination, have become ideal for identifying and addressing the needs of current and potential students, as well as other stakeholders. The aim of this study is to analyze and evaluate how Spanish universities use Instagram for their strategic communication and to offer the scientific community a solid and replicable methodology to study other contexts. Methodology: This is an eminently quantitative, longitudinal and comprehensive study, as it analyzes 165,497 posts from 89 Spanish university accounts posted from 2012 to 2024 using tools related to the Big Data paradigm: Social Network Analysis, Machine Learning and Artificial Neural Networks. Results and Discussion: The results show that the digital activity of the accounts is consolidating, but not all of them achieve the same acceptance by the digital audience. Therefore, the marketing strategies of those accounts with a low Engagement Rate should be adjusted. The hashtags used allude to a sectorial and collegiate register, mainly educational and/or scientific. However, there is one main topic that generates social consensus in the university community: equality between men and women. Likewise, the conversation takes place in neutral or positive terms, with an absence of polemics and polarization. Conclusions: The study contributes a replicable analytical model for assessing the strategic use of social media by universities or similar institutions.

Keywords: Instagram; Social Media Intelligence; Data Mining; Big Data; Corporate Communication; University; Spain.

1. INTRODUCTION

Society has undergone profound transformations in the technological field, which has modified, among other things, the channels used to exchange information. In this regard, in the current context, digital social networks are immersed and fully normalized in different contexts, such as personal, social, and professional environments. Their use is increasingly common among individuals, institutions, and organizations of various kinds to disseminate information, keep in touch with friends and family, promote business, acquire knowledge, or simply as a source of entertainment (Kaplan & Haenlein, 2010; Orbegozo-Terradillos, 2023).

Digital social networks, from a professional and strategic point of view, are current communication channels that enable any type of organization to achieve greater dissemination, obtain information, and be closer to society (Harrison et al., 2017). This evolution of corporate communication is referred to as the phenomenon of ‘symmetrical dialogic communication’, which allows issuing entities to improve their visibility and relationships with audiences, disseminate information, participating in and listening to online conversations with different stakeholders (Capriotti et al., 2020). However, this type of communication has also given rise to the phenomenon of clicktivism (Biraghi et al., 2019; Karpf, 2010), where audience participation is reduced to quick and superficial actions, such as liking, sharing, or commenting. While these interactions increase the visibility and reach of messages, they do not always reflect a genuine commitment to their institution’s values or objectives. This phenomenon presents a challenge for universities, which must balance engagement metrics with the real quality of the relationships they establish with their audiences on platforms such as Instagram.

Organizations dedicated to teaching and research at the higher education level have also joined this dialogic communication or digital strategic communication, because capturing the attention of their potential students (digital natives immersed in Web 2.0 applications) is essential (Capriotti & Zeler, 2023; Pérez-Bonaventura & Rodríguez-Llorente, 2023). Among other functions, digital social networks are indispensable platforms for connecting communities, promoting brand identity, and building a meaningful and distinct reputation among competitors (Mai To et al., 2022; Sataøen & Wæraas, 2016). In this context, universities have begun adopting strategic approaches to manage their online presence to strengthen their brand image and attract their target audiences. Often viewed as academic institutions, they are now seen as brands competing in a global market where social media plays a crucial role in shaping their institutional identity. This approach aligns them with business marketing dynamics, where not only academic programs are promoted, but also quick and visible interactions are sought through low-cost actions (Perera et al., 2022).

The educational field, in general, and the university, in particular, are no stranger to the aforementioned phenomenon of digital strategic communication in the Web 2.0 era, and the impact that social networks can have on the dissemination of information by higher education institutions is significant (Alcolea Parra et al., 2020; Simancas-González & García-López, 2017). The way in which the university’s communication with society is no longer limited only to traditional media. With the emergence of social networks, communication is much more direct and personalized with different audiences, often without intermediaries, allowing for a bidirectional exchange of information (Simón-Onieva, 2014; Thelwall, 2018). In addition, it should not be forgotten that university students, the main target group of universities, are ‘digital natives’ (Prensky, 2001), so communication strategies must align with this reality.

In this regard, the growing importance of social media in education has been extensively documented, highlighting its role in enhancing knowledge sharing, interaction, and collaborative learning in higher education institutions. Recent studies have emphasized how social media facilitates a more dynamic and accessible learning environment (Luong et al., 2023; Nasution, 2024). Furthermore, bibliometric analyses have confirmed the rapid growth of research in this field, underlining the need for robust methodologies to evaluate their impact on institutional communication and student engagement (Fauzi et al., 2023).

In the context of Spanish universities’strategic communication on social media, much of the academic output was concentrated in the 2010s, driven by the emergence and expansion of Web 2.0 and digital platforms (Alonso-García & Alonso-García, 2014). Accordingly, most studies have focused on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, or LinkedIn, often adopting descriptive approaches and traditional methodologies (Oliveira et al., 2022; Paniagua Rojano & Gómez Calderón, 2012; Rodríguez Ruibal & Santamaría Cristino, 2012) or primarily quantitative methods (Pérez-Bonaventura & Vilajosana, 2023). More recent studies, such as that by (Matosas-López & Cuevas-Molano, 2021), although employing big data methodologies, concentrate exclusively on Twitter (now X) and use a limited sample of universities. On the other hand, the comparative perspective on social media use across different countries is enriched by the contributions of Pérez-Bonaventura et al. (2023) and (Cancelo Sanmartín & Almansa Martínez, 2013). Finally, Pérez-Bonaventura’s (2022) doctoral dissertation provides an in-depth and pioneering comparative analysis of four social media platforms (Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and Instagram) across all 82 Spanish universities. The author, beyond identifying Instagram’s clear potential as a future communication tool, concludes that universities “should review their communication strategies” (Pérez-Bonaventura, 2022, p. 302), especially among public institutions.

In this context, this research has two objectives: on the one hand, with a complete and comparative vision, to analyze and evaluate how Spanish universities use Instagram for their digital strategic communication and, on the other hand, to offer the scientific community a solid and replicable methodology to study other contexts or phenomena. It is also done from a longitudinal, comprehensive, and exhaustive perspective, which greatly enriches the study: 12 years of activity are analyzed (the initial year is taken as the year that the first corporate accounts were created), and a complete view of the university landscape is offered (all the accounts of Spanish public and private universities are included in the corpus analyzed). For this purpose, different Social Media Intelligence (SMI) techniques or tools are used, such as Social Network Analysis (SNA), Machine Learning (ML), or Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). Thus, characterizing, through the design of an inductive and structured methodology replicable in other scenarios, the social narrative constructed by Spanish universities.

Considering universities as brands that require essential strategic communication to compete effectively (Whisman, 2011), it is necessary to study the use of social networks by universities. Moreover, there is no doubt that social networks are an immense and valuable source of information and extracting intelligence from information provided by social networks has become increasingly popular (Desai & Han, 2019). This article focuses on addressing this need and exploring these dynamics in the context of Spanish universities.

In this regard, brand image emerges as a critical intangible asset for universities in highly competitive and globalized educational environments. Social media platforms play a central role in shaping and communicating that brand images, enabling institutions to project values, personalities, and identities through visual and interactive content (Capriotti, Martínez-Gras et al., 2023; Capriotti, Oliveira et al., 2023; Sataøen, 2019). The strategic use of Instagram allows universities to construct a coherent narrative aligned with their institutional identity, enhance public perception, and foster emotional connections with prospective and current students. Therefore, studying how universities manage their digital presence is essential to understanding the broader mechanisms of brand positioning and reputation-building in the higher education sector and potentially reformulating them toward more participatory and socially committed communication models (Simancas-González & García-López, 2019). 

1.1. Social Media Intelligence and corporate use of Instagram in Universities

Instagram is one of the most popular and frequently used social networks in Spain (along with WhatsApp and BeReal), being the one that has generated the most interaction in recent years (+10% growth in 2023) (IABSpain, 2024). Moreover, apart from being the fourth social network with the most users worldwide (behind Facebook, YouTube and WhatsApp), in the specific case of Spain, Instagram is the platform with the second largest number of users (74.9% of the population aged 16 to 64 uses it), behind WhatsApp (89.7% of the population in the same age group). Likewise, Instagram has a predominantly young audience; approximately 70% of its users, globally, are under 35 years old (We Are Social, 2023).

In this scenario, as far as scientific studies on Social Network Intelligence are concerned, despite the large number of Instagram users, its academic attention is clearly underrepresented compared to other social networks such as Twitter (Matamoros-Fernández & Farkas, 2021). This statement is corroborated by the comparison of certain data, such as the number of users of one and the other social network: Instagram had 23.8 million active users in Spain in 2022, while Twitter (currently X), obtained a record of 4.39 million (Statista, 2024a, 2024b) and monopolizes a large part of scientific research (Ahmed, 2019). However, the relatively open policy of Twitter, until February 2023, which gave access to data through its official academic API, contrasts with the hermeticism and opacity of networks such as Facebook or Instagram. Thus, the limited academic attention to Instagram is largely explained by the difficulty of systematically acquiring data, making it one of the social networks with the most active users and one of the least studied by the scientific community (Morales-i-Gras & Sánchez-i-Vallès, 2022).

In the specific case of institutions dedicated to higher education, Instagram ranks fifth among the most used social networks by international universities listed in the QS World University ranking and 86.1% of Western European universities in the ranking have an official account on Instagram (Valerio-Ureña et al., 2020). Additionally, the results of a recent study for Swiss universities show that, in recent years, university communication has increased on Instagram, but not on Facebook or Twitter (Sörensen et al., 2023).

Instagram stands out for its high level of engagement, generating up to 58 times more interactions per follower than the social network Facebook and 150 times more interactions than Twitter (Escobar, 2018). Currently, Instagram is already an effective tool for universities: it contributes to strengthening their institutional identities, helping them to position themselves in a truly competitive environment, and broadening the spectrum of the public they address (Alcolea Parra et al., 2020). In this way, university profiles on Instagram aim to act as showcases with their own voice for offline campuses aiming to transition online (Blanco-Sánchez & Moreno-Albarracín, 2023).

In the specific case of Instagram, several studies analyze this platform as a university teaching tool (Ávila, 2021; Gómez-Ortiz et al., 2023; Alonso López & Terol Bolinches, 2020). Additionally, research has explored university students’ consumption of this platform and its effects (Foroughi et al., 2022; Pekpazar et al., 2021; Romero-Rodríguez et al., 2020). However, published research on Instagram as a university corporate tool for digital strategic communication is scarce.

Among the few references found, most of them are focused on analyzing the content of posts published by universities during specific periods (Alcolea Parra et al., 2020; Blanco-Sánchez & Moreno-Albarracín, 2023; Moreno-Albarracín & Blanco-Sánchez, 2022; Stuart et al., 2017), using small datasets and without advanced Big Data techniques. Another characteristic of existing studies is that, apart from focusing on small datasets, they analyze posts over short time periods (Ramadanty & Syafganti, 2021). Likewise, user engagement on Instagram is often studied using traditional methods, such as surveys, to measure the opinions of the student community about institutional communication on Instagram (Kurniawan et al., 2021). In that sense, despite the large amount of data generated by university Instagram accounts, the only works found that process these data through Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques do so with lexicon-based models for sentiment analysis of the obtained texts (Desai & Han, 2019; Thejas et al., 2019).

Thus, in this scenario, it is considered necessary to define the steps of a competitive intelligence methodology to analyze and identify communication trends, to gain insights into digital activity, generate knowledge, and improve communication strategies based on specific objectives. In this sense, universities increasingly resemble businesses, applying marketing strategies to manage their digital presence, attract prospective students, and strengthen their institutional brand in a competitive environment.

2. METHODOLOGY

For the analysis of digital activity on Instagram by Spanish universities, this research adopts an eminently quantitative approach, using techniques and tools related to SNA, ML and ANN in the context of Big Data. Advanced data gathering and processing tools are employed to carry out a detailed analysis, including, among others, language detection, calculation of engagement metrics, content analysis and sentiment analysis, providing a comprehensive and data-driven view of the digital activity of Spanish universities on Instagram.

The study sample comprises the corpus of posts published by the 89 universities with corporate accounts on Instagram out of the 91 universities, public and private, that make up, as of April 2024, the Spanish University System (https://www.educacion.gob.es/ruct/consultauniversidades?actual=universidades). These Instagram accounts have been identified on the official websites of each university and their activity on Instagram over a period of 12 years (from the first post published by a Spanish university on March 6, 2012 to April 13, 2024) has been downloaded (see Supplementary_material_appendix 1).

Two tools provided by the University of Amsterdam are used to obtain and first processing of the data. The first tool, for data retrieval, is Zeeschuimer (Peeters, 2024). The second tool, for downloading data in ‘ndjson’ format is 4CAT (Digital Methods Initiative, 2024). Subsequently, the data is then prepared using data cleansing, transformation, and processing tools: OpenRefine (https://openrefine.org/); VantagePoint (https://www.thevantagepoint.com/)

The data analysis is carried out in four main sections that answer the following research questions:

To answer the first research question, the language used in the post, the temporal distribution of number of posts and number of likes and comments and, the ranking of universities according to digital audience activity is analyzed. For the specific case of identifying the language of the posts, an open-source Artificial Neural Network model for language detection was used: the xlm-roberta-base-language-detection model (Papariello, 2022), pre-trained for language detection using the transformer model, which is based on XLM-RoBERTa and adds a classification head to the model. XLM-RoBERTa is a multilingual variant of the RoBERTa model (Conneau et al., 2020). Moreover, by making use of the unsupervised k-means clustering algorithm, the universities are grouped according to the activity of their digital audience.

In the case of the second research question, to understand the engagement metrics, variables correlated with the likes and comments variables are analyzed. Additionally, the Engagement Rate (ER) for the first four months of 2024 of the Instagram accounts of Spanish universities is calculated. To ensure comparability, engagement rates were calculated based solely on posts from the most recent months of activity. This approach normalizes the data across accounts and reflects current audience interaction levels. Formula 1 shows one of the ways to measure ER for a given period.

Formula 1: Formula used to obtain the Engagement Rate (Orbegozo-Terradillos et al., 2025)

Engagement Rate = [((Likes + Comments) / Posts) Followers] * 100

As for the third research question, the main hashtags used (those that appear most frequently in the posts) are analyzed to provide a first approach to content analysis. Likewise, to explore the thematic configuration of hashtags, a co-occurrence network was constructed, where nodes represent hashtags and edges represent their joint appearance in the same post. The initial network was generated using Pajek (Mrvar & Batagelj, 2025), and subsequently visualized and analyzed in Gephi (Bastian et al., 2009). The Modularity Class algorithm was applied to detect clusters (communities) based on structural modularity rather than predefined themes. Thus, different communities or clusters emerge that serve to observe the thematic preferences of the longitudinal digital conversation analyzed.

Regarding the sentiment analysis of the posts shared by Spanish universities (fourth research question), a multi-class sentiment classification was carried out: positive, neutral or negative. For this purpose, an open-source Artificial Neural Network model for sentiment detection was used: robertuito-sentiment-analysis (https://huggingface.co/pysentimiento/robertuito-sentiment-analysis), a pre-trained model for accurately detecting and classifying sentiments. In this case, the base model is RoBERTuito, a RoBERTa model trained with social media text in Spanish (García-Vega et al., 2020; Pérez et al., 2021).

Finally, it is important to note that the data analyzed in this study were collected exclusively from public institutional Instagram accounts of Spanish universities. Data collection was carried out using academic tools. The analysis focused only on aggregate metrics and institutional content.

Figure 1 shows a summary of the research methodology used.

Figure 1. Methodology applied in the study.

Source: Elaborated by the authors.

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

3.1. Digital Presence of Spanish Universities on Instagram

Of the 91 universities that make up the Spanish University System, it can be seen that 89 have an active Instagram account (representing 97.8% of Spanish universities as of April 2024).

The dataset for this study consists of 165,497 posts published by universities during the period between March 6, 2012, and April 13, 2024. In this dataset, according to the xlm-roberta-base-language-detection model, 92.76% of the posts are in Spanish (153,517 posts); hence, more than 9 out of 10 pieces of content are in Spanish. These data show a relative monolingualism of the digital strategy of the university system as a whole, which focuses its communication efforts mainly on Spanish-speaking community.

From a chronological point of view, another significant fact is worth noting: the frequency of content publication increases over the years. While in 2012 there were only 60 pieces of content published throughout the year (from four official accounts), this figure increases to 24,474 pieces of content in 2023 (the large decrease observed in 2024 is due to the fact that the data collection period only runs until mid-March 2024) (see the top part of Figure 2 and 3). This growth reflects both the increased use of the platform itself and the emergence of new universities with their own communication channels on Instagram. In 2023, with all the analyzed accounts already officially activated, the average number of pieces of content per university was 271.62, slightly less than one post per day (see the bottom part of Figure 2 and 3).

Figure 2. Annual evolution of the total # of posts

Source: Elaborated by the authors.

Figure 3. Annual evolution of the average # of post per university.

Source: Elaborated by the authors.

The increase in posting frequency was progressive, reflecting the popularity of the platform and the activation of new accounts. However, the peaks of greater intensification in terms of growth occurred in the years 2015 and 2017, with 60% and 55% more posts per year, respectively (annual evolution of posts as a whole). The period spanning these years can, in fact, be considered as Instagram's exponential growth cycle in terms of the number of posts by active users. This fact, together with the introduction of new functionalities (Instagram Stories, in August 2016; and Instagram Live, during 2017), the sophistication of algorithms that improved the use of the platform and the growing competition among universities, explains Instagram's expansion, probably also in terms of digital marketing investments.

As for the average annual number of posts per university, the growth follows a similar pattern. The figure almost doubles between 2014 and 2017, and this significant increase slows from that year onwards. It is worth noting that, despite the digitalization and virtualization accelerated by the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020, which led many institutions to intensify their presence on social networks and digital platforms, the increase in posting frequency did not maintain the growth rate observed in previous years.

Figure 4 shows the daily evolution of content. A general increase is observed over the years, especially notable from 2015 onwards, all consistent with the previous figures. Internally, within each annual period, there are peaks of activity and decreases or ‘valleys’, which, from an overall perspective, correspond to the Christmas and summer holiday periods: the intensity decreases significantly in the months of January and August. Therefore, a plausible interpretation of the data is that the logic of activity does not correspond so much to important periods or events in the academic calendar (beginning of the academic year, exam periods, etc.), but to the existence of clearly marked holiday periods in the social calendar, reflecting a decrease in interaction and content production during these times of rest. As for the Covid-19 pandemic, the data show that the global crisis did not produce a clear intensification of activity on Instagram.

Figure 4. Daily evolution of number of posts.

Source: Elaborated by the authors.

In terms of daily variability, another significant detail is that there are certain days in the calendar that produce a notable increase in activity. For instance, observing the microdata, two of the most significant dates on the international agenda for equal rights between men and women —March 8 (International Women's Day) and November 25 (International Day for the Eradication of Violence against Women)— coincide with periods of high interaction. This fact indicates, among other issues, that this topic can be considered to have a high degree of social consensus, showing broad acceptance and support by the university community.

However, it should be noted that the number of posts is an indicator that brings us closer to the concept of intensity in the digital activity of Spanish universities, but it does not provide information on the acceptance of these posts by the Instagram audience. In contrast, indicators such as the number of likes or the number of comments better approximate aspects related to audience reactions to the content published by the universities. Therefore, after having eliminated the posts with extreme outliers of likes or comments (Interquartile Range, IQR factor = 3[1]) to ensure the integrity of the analysis, of the 153,916 posts used for the study, it is observed that as of 2018, the rate of reactions (per post) by Instagram users has managed to remain constant (see Figure 5 and 6).

Figure 5. Annual evolution of likes per post

Source: Elaborated by the authors.

Figure 6. Annual evolution of comments per post

Source: Elaborated by the authors.

One way to put all the above data into context is to compare the average number of likes and comments that each university has achieved on its posts. The relationship between the average of these two variables per post for each university (see Figure 7), shows that both are strongly correlated (r = 0.78), i.e., the more likes per post a university account collects, the more comments per post it will get. This suggests a coherent pattern of audience engagement, where liking and commenting behaviors are closely aligned.

Furthermore, the unsupervised k-means algorithm, selecting the clustering with the highest Silhouette value (0.5), classifies universities into two different segments, nearly equal in terms of the number of universities: universities that make up the group with the least active audiences (cluster 1, in green) and universities with the most active audiences on Instagram, with many likes and many comments per post (cluster 0, in red) (see Supplementary_material_appendix 1 for acronyms).

Figure 7. Relationship between the average number of likes and the average number of comments per content of Spanish universities

C:\Users\bcpzabie\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.MSO\F5B89D2D.tmp

Source: Elaborated by the authors.

The clusters are distributed along the trend line, but important nuances can be observed. For instance, some universities in Cluster 0 are significantly above the regression line, indicating that their posts generate more comments than would be expected given the number of likes, suggesting a deeper or more conversational engagement. Conversely, some universities below the line receive relatively fewer comments compared to likes, indicating a more superficial interaction.

Since interaction with the digital community is one of the most prominent aspirations of digital communication strategies, the aspiration of those institutions located in cluster 1 (more passive audiences) will be to move to the area of the graph occupied by cluster 0 (publish content that encourages interaction with their audience). In fact, only a small portion of the Spanish university system (the red cluster, toward the upper right of the graph) has managed to build an active digital community with high levels of engagement. 

To better illustrate the distribution shown in Figure 7, we identified the four universities with the highest and several universities with the lowest levels of audience engagement, measured by the combined average number of likes and comments per post. At the top of the list are Universidad de Alicante (UA), Universidad Católica San Antonio (UCAM), Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM) and Universidad de La Laguna (ULL), which stand out for achieving high levels of interaction and positioning themselves in the upper-right quadrant of the graph. These institutions, all of them medium-to-large in size (with more than 15,000 students) can serve as benchmarks for successful digital communication strategies, as their posts generate both visibility and audience participation.

In contrast, institutions such as Universidad Internacional de Andalucía (UNIA), Universidad de las Hespérides (UH), Universidad Euneiz, Universidad Internacional de la Empresa (UNIE), i.e., whose main characteristic is their private management (with the exception of UNIA) and lower student enrollmentappear in the lower-left region of the graph, indicating weaker performance in terms of user engagement. These universities face the challenge of rethinking their content strategies to better connect with their audience and foster more active digital communities. This segmentation highlights the diverse levels of maturity and effectiveness in the use of Instagram as a strategic communication tool within the Spanish university system.

3.2. Engagement Metrics and Engagement Rate on Instagram

As mentioned in the previous section, in addition to the communicative intensity of the social network (active network in number of posts), the engagement of the digital community (through likes and comments, among others), must also be taken into account.

A particularly relevant point is identifying which parameters are positively associated with the phenomenon of “likes” (see Figure 8). In this regard, there is a substantial relationship between the number of likes a post receives and the account’s age, the number of posts published, and the number of followers the university has on Instagram. This correlation is weaker when considering the institution’s total number of students or the number of accounts the university itself follows.

Another relevant indicator for assessing digital dialogue or engagement with the university community is the number of comments. In this case, there is no evidence that universities with a larger student body receive more comments, nor does a higher posting frequency necessarily lead to more community engagement through comments. Regarding positive and statistically significant correlations, older accounts tend to accumulate slightly more comments. Moreover, accounts with more followers receive more comments, and posts with higher numbers of likes also to tend to receive more comments. However, this link remains moderate, suggesting that not all quantitative interaction (likes) translates into qualitative interaction (comments).

However, this does not necessarily mean that their content is better. In this context, the Engagement Rate (ER) provides an assessment of the quality of content, regardless of the number of posts or followers of an account. Thus, the ER (Keyhole, s.f.; Lauron, 2024) provides a unified metric that reflects the performance of each Instagram account, facilitating comparisons between profiles with different levels of activity and followers.

Figure 8. Correlation of metrics of Spanish university accounts on Instagram

C:\Users\bcpzabie\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.MSO\FC4D54C3.tmp

Source: Elaborated by the authors.

From the analysis of the ER for the first four months (from January 1 to April 13, 2024) of the 89 Instagram accounts of Spanish universities, it can be seen that this value differs from one account to another (see Figure 9) (see Supplementary_material_appendix 1 for acronyms).

Figure 9. ER of the first four months of 2024 of Spanish university accounts on Instagram

Source: Elaborated by the authors.

Although the average ER is 1.56, in the case of ESIC (Business School, Madrid) an unusually high ER is observed. This is due to the fact that, despite having a small number of followers (4,201 followers) and publishing very few posts during the first four months of 2024 (30 posts), one of its posts achieved a high level of interaction (20,862 likes and 602 comments):

Original: ¡Hola a todos los que estais en Generación ESIC!

Deja un comentario aquí para participar en los sorteos de hoy ⬇️ ¡Suerte a tod@s! 🎉💙🍀

In English: Hello to all of you in ESIC Generation!

Leave a comment here to participate in today's sweepstakes ⬇️ Good luck to all! 🎉💙🍀

The fact that viewers were specifically asked to comment to enter a sweepstakes is the obvious driving force behind the high interaction.

3.3. Analysis of Hashtags on Instagram

Hashtags are a fundamental tool in social networks for organizing and categorizing content; they also help to increase the visibility of posts, facilitate the search for information on specific topics, serve to create communities and increase participation. In particular, in this context, hashtags promote the corporate brand of universities. In that regard, this research captures 72,562 unique hashtags employed[2], in various languages, on Instagram posts. As can be seen, there is a large number of words or terms converted into hashtags, indicating the wide variety of topics addressed with the content posted, as well as their strategic use in communicative terms.

However, for a more specific analysis, the list of the 100 most-used hashtags by Spanish universities is used as a reference. Of that ranking, all hashtags appear more than 900 times in the entire sample. The word cloud in Figure 10 provides an overview of the most frequent topics, illustrating the use of hashtags and their importance in the analyzed digital conversation. Specifically, in the Top-10, the following hashtags emerge: #universidad (26,382), #unileon (8,272), #university (7,484), #leonesp (6,206), #repost (6,029), #estudiantes (4,311), #ulpgc (4,206), #master (3,928), #sevilla (3,530), #madrid (3,433) (see Supplementary_material_appendix 2 for information on the hashtags in Spanish used throughout the text).

In general terms, although the hashtag has been used in other social networks and in other digital conversations eminently for activist purposes (Orbegozo-Terradillos, 2023), in this case, their use is far from that purpose. It is a conversation of a corporate nature, focused on sector-specific topics (education and research), where universities are constantly self-citing or self-referencing and place the conversation in the context of a relatively neutral dialogue between the educational institution and current and potential clients/consumers of the institution itself. There are clear attempts to create a community with hashtags such as #somosupm, #somuji or #somosuned, but most of them are terms related to the institutional name of the University (#unileon, #ulpgc, #universidaddesevilla, #uclm, #ucavila, etc.), the geographical location of the entity (#leonesp, #sevilla, #madrid, #malaga, #barcelona, etc.) or generic terms related to higher education and research (#master, #investigacion, #grado, #ciencia, #tecnologia, etc.).

Figure 10. The 100 most used hashtags

C:\Users\bcpzabie\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.MSO\8E3003B0.tmp

Source: Elaborated by the authors.

On the other hand, although with less presence in the Top-100, there is an attempt to reinforce brand identity through the creation of custom hashtags, as in the case of #deusto360 or #nosoloingenieria (UPM, Polytechnic University of Madrid). These hashtags are of a propagandistic or marketing nature and summarize certain ideas and fundamental concepts to characterize the institution itself or certain campaigns. In addition, it is worth noting that certain hashtags related to the dynamics of the platform itself emerge (#repost, #instaupv, #pickoftheday, etc.), indicating a relative knowledge of the functioning and logics operating on Instagram.

Finally, with regard to languages, it is clear that English (the only language other than Spanish and Catalan present in the top positions) is used for advertising purposes and is aimed at future foreign students who must choose a destination for their university studies. Hashtags such as #university, #uviclife, #studyabroad, #bachelor, #students, etc. correspond to this section.

On the other hand, regarding the hashtags co-occurrence network, 2,330 different communities have been identified from the interaction network of 72,562 hashtags (nodes), with a modularity figure of 0.468, which gives the community structure considerable mathematical significance. Of these communities, only six account for more than 5% of the hashtags in the network, making them the top six communities (see Figure 11).

Figure 11. Hashtag co-occurrence network after filtering the six main communities

C:\Users\bcpzabie\Desktop\UNIVERSIDADES (Instagram)\EMAITZAK\Hashtag\Instagram_1.png

Source: Elaborated by the authors.

Therefore, the algorithm generates six communities representative of the content posted during the years analyzed. For this work, the meaning of the hashtags is analyzed by contextualizing them, and a nomenclature is obtained for each cluster (see Figure 9) as detailed below:

3.4. Sentiment Analysis on Instagram

Sentiment analysis of Spanish universities´ posts aims to describe universities´ attitudes toward the messages posted (in Spanish). Figure 12 shows the ratio of positive, neutral and negative posts for the analyzed time span. It appears that communicates when different universities spread their messages through Instagram, they tend to do so in neutral or positive terms. In this regard, the robertuito-sentiment-analysis model detects that fewer than two posts out of a hundred (1.69%) could be placed in the group of negative messages. This figure is extremely low in comparison with other digital conversations that allude to more controversial topics (Amiri et al., 2023), indicating that the communicative exchange is characterized by the absence of controversy and polarization. In general, therefore, it reflects a sectorial communicative register characteristic of corporate social network accounts, where institutions communicate or disseminate content in neutral or positive terms to their followers.

Regarding the trend of sentiment of the posts over the years, Figure 13 shows how the proportion of positive, neutral and negative posts remains practically constant since 2014. However, it is worth noting that the upward trend in positive messages from 2015 to 2019 was interrupted in 2020, at the time of the Covid-19 pandemic. During 2020, the series records the lowest number of messages in positive terms (22.49%), while the number of negative messages rises (2.15%). These data are relatively logical and consistent with scientific studies that have analyzed the phenomenon of the pandemic and its translation into digital rhetoric (Qi & Shabrina, 2023). Society, especially during the first months of the pandemic (early 2020), experienced a stage characterized by shock and fear (health concerns, lack of knowledge about the virus and its effects, etc.) and all of this is reflected in digital conversations.

In this regard, it is important to note that during the pandemic years, universities did not publish content exclusively about the global health crisis. However, part of their posts revolved around the global epidemic and its consequences in the sector to which their activity is circumscribed. Another fact corroborating the effect of the pandemic is that the number of negative messages begins to decline after 2020, while the number of positive messages rises progressively during the second pandemic phase (years 2021, 2022 and even 2023). The collective mood or social climate during those years was characterized by other emotions such as hope, resilience, optimism, etc.

Figure 12. Positive, neutral and negative posts in the period analyzed

Source: Elaborated by the authors.

Figure 13. Positive, neutral and negative posts by year

Source: Elaborated by the authors.

4. CONCLUSIONS, LIMITATIONS AND FUTURE LINES OF WORK

This study offers valuable insights into the use of Instagram as a strategic communication tool by Spanish universities during 12 years of digital activity. It is a work with an eminently quantitative approach and stands out for its longitudinal and comprehensive approach. It uses tools related to the paradigm of Big Data (Social Network Analysis, Machine Learning, and Artificial Neural Networks) to analyze more than 165,000 posts from 89 active accounts of higher education institutions. There is scarce literature with which to compare the results obtained in this study, mainly because the difficult access to data corresponding to interactions in social networks, such as Instagram, results in limited scientific production focused on this platform. In this sense, university institutions have never before been the subject of study with the approach, methodology, and tools used in this study.

This research provides a model for assessing the digital presence of universities by analyzing audience interactivity, thematic trends, and the overall tone of the content shared over time. These findings offer a clear map of digital performance that can help institutions benchmark their communication efforts and identify areas for strategic improvement. In particular, the segmentation of universities based on engagement levels serves as a valuable tool for communication managers, enabling them to understand their positioning and develop more effective strategies.

Beyond content quality, the results also suggest that strategic communication should be more consistent over time, not limited to periods of academic activity. A more sustained presence throughout the year could help build a stronger and more engaged digital community. Moreover, the relatively low posting frequency observed in many institutions, often below one post per day on average, indicates that there is room for increasing content output to maintain audience attention and relevance. These practical insights are intended to support university communication teams in making informed decisions to enhance their visibility, engagement, and overall brand positioning in an increasingly competitive digital landscape.

The main and daily language is Spanish, while English is used mainly to attract foreign students. The activity as a whole is progressively consolidating, without yet reaching one post published per day. Spanish universities use Instagram unevenly, and not all of them get the same reception from the digital audience. Thus, those university accounts that have an audience characterized by their passivity towards the published content should improve the interaction with their audiences, making them digitally active by offering attractive content in terms of interactivity. However, these interactions may be influenced by the phenomenon of clicktivism, where superficial actions, such as likes or comments, can inflate engagement metrics without reflecting genuine commitment to the universities' messages. While clicktivism can increase the visibility and reach of posts, it may lead to misleading interpretations of engagement; as such, interactions do not necessarily translate into deeper relationships or authentic interest in the university’s values or initiatives. This phenomenon highlights the need to go beyond quantitative metrics and focuses on evaluating the quality of engagement and the real impact of social media strategies.

In the specific case of those university accounts with a low Engagement Rate, it is possible, among other things, that they have a significant number of followers who are not their target customers or that their content is not attractive enough to interact with them. Therefore, marketing strategies should be adjusted accordingly.

The hashtags used in the posts alluded to a sector-specific and collegial register, mainly educational and/or scientific. However, the study detects a main theme that generates social consensus in the university community: equality between men and women. Likewise, the digital conversation develops in neutral or positive terms, with an absence of polemics and polarization.

Despite the robustness of the dataset and methodology applied, this study is not without limitations. Chief among them is the exclusion of Instagram Stories and Reels from the analysis. These formats have become increasingly important on the platform in recent years, but their ephemeral nature (particularly in the case of Stories, which disappear after 24 hours along with their interactions) poses significant challenges for data collection and long-term analysis. Consequently, the engagement metrics presented here may not fully reflect the actual performance or communicative success of some university accounts. Nevertheless, this study provides a solid and innovative foundation for understanding institutional communication on Instagram over an extended period.

Finally, this study opens the way for further research that could focus on the individual analysis of specific university accounts, as well as the study of content that generates the highest levels of interactivity or engagement. Moreover, the methodological model proposed, based on longitudinal data analysis and the use of Big Data and machine learning techniques, is highly adaptable and can be replicated not only in other universities, but also in a wide range of institutions, public organizations, or private entities interested in evaluating and improving their digital communication strategies. By integrating a critical perspective on issues such as engagement inequality and superficial interaction, this study encourages new lines of research that explore the ethical, qualitative, and strategic dimensions of digital presence across different sectors.

5. REFERENCES

Ahmed, W. (2019). Using Twitter as a data source: an overview of social media research tools (2019). LSE Blogshttps://tinyurl.com/57cmz2rr

Alcolea Parra, M., Rodríguez Barba, D., & Núñez Fernández, V. (2020). El uso corporativo de Instagram en las universidades privadas españolas. Estudio comparativo de 35 universidades. Ámbitos. Revista Internacional de Comunicación, 47, 109-134. https://doi.org/10.12795/ambitos.2020.i47.06

Alonso-García, S., & Alonso-García, M. del M. (2014). Las redes sociales en las universidades españolas. Revista de Comunicación de la SEECI, 33, 132-140. https://doi.org/10.15198/SEECI.2014.33.132-140

Amiri, M., Yaghtin, M., & Sotudeh, H. (2023). How do tweeters feel about scientific misinformation: an infoveillance sentiment analysis of tweets on retraction notices and retracted papers. Scientometrics129(1), 261-287. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-023-04871-7

Ávila, J. (2021). #MultimediaResponse: Instagram as a Reading Activity in a University English Class. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy64(5), 531-541. https://doi.org/10.1002/JAAL.1128

Bastian, M., Heimann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 3(1), 361-362. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937 

Biraghi, S., Gambetti, R. C., & Beccanulli, A. A. (2019). Corporate branding at the crossroad between socio-political engagement and consumer clicktivism. In Marketing 4.0: Le Sfide Della Multicanalità XVI SIM Conference (pp. 1-1). SIM. 

Blanco-Sánchez, T., & Moreno-Albarracín, B. (2023). Instagram como canal de comunicación en el ámbito académico. Comparativa de las estrategias de las mejores universidades del mundo. Revista de Comunicación22(1), 35-51. https://doi.org/10.26441/rc22.1-2023-3001

Cancelo Sanmartín, M., & Almansa Martínez, A. (2013). Estrategias comunicativas en redes sociales. Estudio comparativo entre las universidades de España y México. Historia y Comunicación Social18(3), 423-435. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_HICS.2013.v18.44339 

Capriotti, P., Martínez-Gras, R., & Zeler, I. (2023). Does universities’ posting strategy influence their social media engagement? An analysis of the top-ranked higher education institutions in different countries. Higher Education Quarterly77(4), 911-931. https://doi.org/10.1111/HEQU.12439

Capriotti, P., Oliveira, A., & Carretón, C. (2023). A model for assessing the active presence of institutions on social media: application to universities worldwide. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education34(2), 1035-1055. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2023.2166188

Capriotti, P., & Zeler, I. (2023). Analysing effective social media communication in higher education institutions. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications10(656), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02187-8

Capriotti, P., Zeler, I., & Camilleri, M. A. (2020). Corporate Communication Through Social Networks: The Identification of the Key Dimensions for Dialogic Communication. In M. A. Camilleri (Ed.), Strategic Corporate Communication in the Digital Age. Emerald. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3676983

Conneau, A., Khandelwal, K., Goyal, N., Chaudhary, V., Wenzek, G., Guzmán, F., Grave, E., Ott, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2020). Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scale. arXiv: 1911.02116. https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.02116

Desai, S., & Han, M. (2019). Social media content analytics beyond the text: A case study of university branding in Instagram. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Southeast Conference (ACMSE '19) (pp. 94-101). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3299815.3314441 

Digital Methods Initiative. (2024). 4CAT: Capture and Analysis Toolkit. Digital Methods - Tools. https://www.digitalmethods.net/Dmi/Tool4CAT

Escobar, C. (2018). Una Guía Para Hacer Publicidad en Redes Sociales. SproutSocialhttps://sproutsocial.com/es/insights/publicidad-en-redes-sociales/

Fauzi, M. A., Mohamad, F., & Abdul Wahab, N. (2023). Knowledge sharing via social media in higher education: a bibliometric analysis. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education16(5), 1420-1437. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-02-2023-0077

Foroughi, B., Griffiths, M. D., Iranmanesh, M., & Salamzadeh, Y. (2022). Associations Between Instagram Addiction, Academic Performance, Social Anxiety, Depression, and Life Satisfaction Among University Students. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction20(4), 2221-2242. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11469-021-00510-5

García-Vega, M., Díaz-Galiano, M. C., García-Cumbreras, M. Á., Plaza Del Arco, F. M., Montejo-Ráez, A., Jiménez-Zafra, S. M., Cámara, E. M., Aguilar, C. A., Antonio, M., Sobrevilla Cabezudo, M. A., Chiruzzo, L., & Moctezuma, D. (2020). Overview of TASS 2020: Introducing Emotion Detection. En Proceedings of the Iberian Languages Evaluation Forum (IberLEF 2020) (Vol. 2664, pp. 163-170). CEUR Workshop Proceedings. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2664/tass_overview.pdf

Gómez-Ortiz, M. J., Domínguez Romero, E., & Bobkina, J. (2023). Instagram as a learning tool to improve technical vocabulary for sports science students. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 32, 100416. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHLSTE.2022.100416

Harrison, A., Burress, R., Velasquez, S., & Schreiner, L. (2017). Social Media Use in Academic Libraries: A Phenomenological Study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship43(3), 248-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACALIB.2017.02.014

IABSpain. (2024). Estudio de Redes Sociales 2024https://iabspain.es/estudio/estudio-de-redes-sociales-2024/

Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons53(1), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BUSHOR.2009.09.003

Karpf, D. (2010). Online Political Mobilization from the Advocacy Group’s Perspective: Looking Beyond Clicktivism. Policy & Internet2(4), 7-41. https://doi.org/10.2202/1944-2866.1098

Keyhole. (s.f.). Profile Analytics Dashboardhttps://help.keyhole.co/en/articles/11650685-profile-analytics-dashboard 

Kurniawan, Y., Setiawan, S., Bhutkar, G., Johan, & Cabezas, D. (2021). Instagram Engagement for University. In 2020 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech) (pp. 887-892). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=9211134

Alonso López, N., & Terol Bolinches, R. (2020). Transmedia literacy and social networks: Instagram as a teaching tool in the university classroom. Journal ICONO 1418(2), 138-161. https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v18i2.1518

Luong, D. H., Nguyen, X. A., Ngo, T. T., Tran, M. N., & Nguyen, H. L. (2023). Social Media in General Education: A Bibliometric Analysis of Web of Science from 2005-2021. Journal of Scientometric Research12(3), 680-690. https://doi.org/10.5530/JSCIRES.12.3.066

Mai To, A., Mindzak, M., Thongpapanl, N., & Mindzak, J. (2022). Social media branding strategies of universities and colleges in Canada: a mixed-method approach investigating post characteristics and contents. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education34(2), 946-966. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2022.2139790

Matamoros-Fernández, A., & Farkas, J. (2021). Racism, Hate Speech, and Social Media: A Systematic Review and Critique. Television & New Media22(2), 205-224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476420982230

Matosas-López, L., & Cuevas-Molano, E. (2021). Propuestas para unas estrategias de marketing en redes sociales, más eficientes. El análisis de las cuentas corporativas universitarias. Vivat Academia154(mayo), 409-428. https://doi.org/10.15178/VA.2021.154.E1358

Morales-i-Gras, J., & Sánchez-i-Vallès, O. (2022). El 14F en Instagram. Una propuesta de articulación de técnicas de raspado web i análisis de redes. Papers. Revista de Sociologia107(1), 147-174. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers.2967

Moreno-Albarracín, B., & Blanco-Sánchez, T. (2022). Brand Communities on Instagram: Study of the Strategies of the World’s Best Universities. Palabra Clave25(4), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.5294/PACLA.2022.25.4.5

Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (2025). Programs for Analysis and Visualization of Very Large Networks Reference Manualhttp://mrvar.fdv.uni-lj.si/pajek/pajekman.pdf

Nasution, A. K. P. (2024). Analyzing the use of social media in education: A bibliometric review of research publications. Education and Information Technologies29(8), 9495-9516. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-023-12179-5

Oliveira, A., Capriotti, P., & Zeler, I. (2022). El estado de la cuestión de la investigación sobre la comunicación digital de las universidades. Redmarka. Revista de Marketing Aplicado26(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.17979/REDMA.2022.26.2.9240

Orbegozo-Terradillos, J. (2023). Tuits personales, clics colectivos: hashitivismo feminista en el debate público digital contemporáneo. University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU).

Orbegozo-Terradillos, J., Larrondo-Ureta, A., & Morales-I-Gras, J. (2025). TikTok y comunicación política: pautas de interacción e índice de engagement de candidatos y partidos en una campaña electoral. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 83, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2025-2323

Paniagua Rojano, F. J., & Gómez Calderón, B. J. (2012). Hacia la comunicación 2.0. El uso de las redes sociales por parte de las universidades españolas. Revista ICONO 14. Revista científica de Comunicación y Tecnologías emergentes10(3), 346-364. https://doi.org/10.7195/RI14.V10I3.473

Papariello, L. (2022). Xlm-roberta-base-language-detection. Hugging Face. https://huggingface.co/papluca/xlm-roberta-base-language-detection

Peeters, S. (2024). Zeeschuimerhttps://github.com/digitalmethodsinitiative/zeeschuimer

Pekpazar, A., Kaya Aydın, G., Aydın, U., Beyhan, H., & Arı, E. (2021). Role of Instagram Addiction on Academic Performance among Turkish University Students: Mediating Effect of Procrastination. Computers and Education Open, 2, 100049. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CAEO.2021.100049

Perera, C. H., Nayak, R., & Nguyen, L. T. V. (2022). The impact of social media marketing and brand credibility on higher education institutes’ brand equity in emerging countries. Journal of Marketing Communications29(8), 770-795. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2022.2086284

Pérez-Bonaventura, M. (2022). Análisis de las redes sociales y sus variables de las universidades públicas y privadas de España [Doctoral tesis, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya]. UPCommons. UPC's open knowledge portal. https://doi.org/10.5821/DISSERTATION-2117-413352

Pérez-Bonaventura, M., Fortó-Areny, J., & Mariño-Mesías, R. M. (2023). Las redes sociales de universidades públicas de Andorra, España y Francia: Estudio y análisis de las redes sociales de universidades públicas de Andorra, España y Francia. VISUAL REVIEW. International Visual Culture Review Revista Internacional De Cultura Visual14(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.37467/revvisual.v10.4609

Pérez-Bonaventura, M., & Rodríguez-Llorente, C. (2023). Activity of universities in social networks. Correlations of rankings, students, followers and interactions. Profesional de La Información32(1). https://doi.org/10.3145/EPI.2023.ENE.09

Pérez-Bonaventura, M., & Vilajosana, J. (2023). Estudio con modelos de regresión de la comunicación de las universidades españolas en redes sociales: Análisis de regresión de la interacción y de los/las seguidores/as de las universidades en redes sociales. Prisma Social: Revista de Investigación Social, 41, 146-174. https://revistaprismasocial.es/article/view/5059/5595 

Pérez, J. M., Furman, D. A., Alonso Alemany, L., & Luque, F. M. (2022). RoBERTuito: A pre-trained language model for social media text in Spanish. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (pp. 7235–7243). European Language Resources Association. https://aclanthology.org/2022.lrec-1.785 

Pérez, J. M., Rajngewerc, M., Giudici, J. C., Furman, D. A., Luque, F., Alonso Alemany, L. y Martínez, M. V. (2021). pysentimiento: A Python toolkit for opinion mining and social NLP tasks. arXiv:2106.09462. https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.09462 

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon9(5), 1-6. https://desarrollodocente.uc.cl/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Digital_Natives_Digital_Inmigrants.pdf

Qi, Y., & Shabrina, Z. (2023). Sentiment analysis using Twitter data: a comparative application of lexicon- and machine-learning-based approach. Social Network Analysis and Mining13(31), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13278-023-01030-X

Ramadanty, S., & Syafganti, I. (2021). Discovering Indonesian Higher Education Promotional Content through Instagram. In 2021 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech) (pp. 320-3025). IEEE.

Lauron, S. (October 07, 2024). What is a Good Engagement Rate on Instagram?, RivalIQ. https://www.rivaliq.com/blog/good-engagement-rate-instagram/

Rodríguez Ruibal, A., & Santamaría Cristino, P. (2012). Análisis del uso de las redes sociales en Internet: Facebook y Twitter en las Universidades españolas. Revista ICONO 14. Revista científica de Comunicación y Tecnologías emergentes10(2), 228-246. https://doi.org/10.7195/RI14.V10I2.198

Romero-Rodríguez, J. M., Aznar-Díaz, I., Marín-Marín, J. A., Soler-Costa, R., & Rodríguez-Jiménez, C. (2020). Impact of Problematic Smartphone Use and Instagram Use Intensity on Self-Esteem with University Students from Physical Education. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health17(12), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH17124336

Sataøen, H. L. (2019). Sub-sector branding and nation branding: the case of higher education. Corporate Communications: An International Journal24(3), 425-438. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-05-2018-0056

Sataøen, H. L., & Wæraas, A. (2016). Building a Sector Reputation: The Strategic Communication of National Higher Education. International Journal of Strategic Communication10(3), 165-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2016.1176567

Simancas-González, E., & García-López, M. (2017). Gestión de la comunicación en las universidades públicas españolas. Profesional de La Informacion26(4), 735-744. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.jul.17

Simancas-González, E., & García-López, M. (2019). Institutional communication at Spanish public universities from the approach of participatory communication. Education Policy Analysis Archives27(144), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.27.4359

Simón-Onieva, J. E. (2014). El uso de las Redes Sociales en el ámbito de la comunicación universitaria andaluza. Revista Intenacional de Relaciones Públicas4(8), 139-160.

Sörensen, I., Fürst, S., Vogler, D., & Schäfer, M. S. (2023). Higher Education Institutions on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter: Comparing Swiss Universities’ Social Media Communication. Media and Communication11(1), 264-277. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i1.6069

Statista. (2024a). Número de usuarios de Instagram en España entre 2015 y 2022https://es.statista.com/estadisticas/878407/numero-de-usuarios-de-instagram-en-espana/

Statista. (2024b). Número de usuarios de X (Twitter) en España de 2019 a 2025https://es.statista.com/estadisticas/520056/usuarios-de-twitter-en-espana/

Stuart, E., Stuart, D., & Thelwall, M. (2017). An investigation of the online presence of UK universities on Instagram. Online Information Review41(5), 582-597. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-02-2016-0057

Thejas, G. S., Kumar, K., Iyengar, S. S., Badrinath, P., & Sunitha, N. R. (2019). AI-NLP Analytics: A thorough Comparative Investigation on India-USA Universities Branding on the Trending Social Media Platform “Instagram”. In 2019 4th International Conference on Computational Systems and Information Technology for Sustainable Solution (CSITSS) (pp. 1-8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSITSS47250.2019.9031050 

Thelwall, M. (2018). Social media analytics for YouTube comments: potential and limitations. International Journal of Social Research Methodology21(3), 303-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2017.1381821

Valerio-Ureña, G., Herrera-Murillo, D., & Madero-Gómez, S. (2020). Analysis of the Presence of Most Best-Ranked Universities on Social Networking Sites. Informatics7(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics7010009 

We Are Social. (2023). Digital 2023. La guía definitiva para un mundo digital en evoluciónhttps://wearesocial.com/es/blog/2023/01/digital-2023/

Whisman, R. (2011). An Academic Enterprise Approach to Higher Education Brandinghttps://www.academia.edu/10841273/An_Academic_Enterprise_Approach_to_Higher_Education_Branding 

 

Appendix 1 (Information about downloaded data)

University (acronym)

Instagram account

# post downloaded

Account creation date

Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (UPV/EHU)

https://www.instagram.com/upvehu_gara/

904

01/12/2017

Universidad de Deusto (UDE)

https://www.instagram.com/udeusto/

1602

01/01/2014

Mondragón Unibertsitatea (UMON)

https://www.instagram.com/munibertsitatea/

1276

01/12/2014

Universidad Euneiz (EUNEIZ)

https://www.instagram.com/euneiz_universidad/

353

01/03/2022

Universidad de Cádiz (UCA)

https://www.instagram.com/univcadiz/

4649

01/02/2015

Universidad de Córdoba (UCO)

https://www.instagram.com/universidaddecordoba/

2029

01/07/2015

Universidad de Granada (UGR)

https://www.instagram.com/canalugr/

1072

01/10/2015

Universidad de Málaga (UMA)

https://www.instagram.com/infouma

2716

01/03/2014

Universidad de Sevilla (USE)

https://www.instagram.com/unisevilla/

4629

01/07/2013

Universidad de Almería (UAL)

https://www.instagram.com/unialmeria

1141

01/01/2020

Universidad de Huelva (UHU)

https://www.instagram.com/unihuelva/

279

01/05/2017

Universidad de Jaén (UJA)

https://www.instagram.com/universidadjaen/

2444

01/10/2015

Universidad Pablo de Olavide (UPO)

https://www.instagram.com/pablodeolavide/

2461

01/01/2015

Universidad Internacional de Andalucía (UNIA)

https://www.instagram.com/uniauniversidad/?hl=es

721

01/07/2019

Universidad Loyola Andalucía (ULA)

https://www.instagram.com/loyolaand/

1998

01/06/2015

Universidad de Zaragoza (UZA)

https://www.instagram.com/universidaddezaragoza

847

01/11/2018

Universidad San Jorge (USJ)

https://www.instagram.com/universidadsanjorge/

857

01/12/2015

Universidad de La Laguna (ULL)

https://www.instagram.com/universidaddelalaguna/?hl=es

814

01/03/2017

Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (UPGC)

https://www.instagram.com/ulpgc_para_ti

4525

01/06/2016

Universidad Europea de Canarias (UEC)

https://www.instagram.com/ueuropea/

2011

01/07/2013

Universidad Fernando Pessoa-Canarias (UFP-C)

https://www.instagram.com/ufpcanarias/

1139

01/04/2017

Universidad del Atlántico Medio (UAtM)

https://www.instagram.com/atlanticomedio/

1219

01/04/2016

Universidad de las Hespérides (UH)

https://www.instagram.com/univ.hesperides/

236

01/03/2021

Universidad de Cantabria (UCN)

https://www.instagram.com/universidaddecantabria

1081

01/08/2016

Universidad Europea del Atlántico (UtA)

https://www.instagram.com/uneatlantico

2287

01/01/2016

Universidad de León (ULE)

https://www.instagram.com/unileon_es/

8736

01/12/2013

Universidad de Salamanca (USAL)

https://www.instagram.com/usal/?hl=es

1548

01/04/2015

Universidad de Valladolid (UVA)

https://www.instagram.com/universidaddevalladolid/

1052

01/03/2016

Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca (UPSA)

https://www.instagram.com/upsa_salamanca/

1264

01/05/2018

Universidad de Burgos (UBU)

https://www.instagram.com/universidadburgos/

504

01/05/2015

IE Universidad (IE)

https://www.instagram.com/ieuniversity/

1363

01/07/2013

Universidad Católica Santa Teresa de Jesús de Ávila (UCAV)

https://www.instagram.com/ucavila/

3546

01/10/2014

Universidad Europea Miguel de Cervantes (UEMC)

https://www.instagram.com/uemc

1020

01/05/2015

Universidad Internacional Isabel I de Castilla (UI1)

https://www.instagram.com/ui1universidad/

1674

01/10/2016

Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM)

https://www.instagram.com/uclm_es/

3648

01/02/2015

Universidad de Barcelona (UBA)

https://www.instagram.com/UniBarcelona/

3090

01/03/2014

Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona (UAB)

https://www.instagram.com/uabbarcelona/

2527

01/03/2014

Universidad Politécnica de Catalunya (UPC)

https://www.instagram.com/la_upc/

1311

01/05/2016

Universidad Pompeu Fabra (UPF)

https://www.instagram.com/upfbarcelona

1912

01/01/2013

Universidad Ramón Llull (URLL)

Does not have Instagram (does have other social networks)

 

 

Universidad Rovira i Virgili (URV)

https://www.instagram.com/universitatURV/

659

01/12/2014

Universidad de Girona (UDG)

https://www.instagram.com/univgirona

923

01/03/2012

Universidad de Lleida (UDL)

Does not have Instagram (does have other social networks)

 

 

Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC)

https://www.instagram.com/uocuniversitat

1123

01/11/2012

Universidad de Vic-Universidad Central de Catalunya (UVIC)

https://www.instagram.com/uvic_ucc/

2348

01/03/2013

Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (UIC)

https://www.instagram.com/uicbarcelona/

908

01/04/2012

Universitat Abat Oliba CEU (UAO)

https://www.instagram.com/uaoceu_universitat/

958

01/03/2016

Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)

https://www.instagram.com/uni.complutense/

2472

01/09/2016

Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM)

https://www.instagram.com/uammadrid/?hl=es

2121

01/02/2015

Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)

https://www.instagram.com/somosupm/

2698

01/05/2016

Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED)

https://www.instagram.com/uneduniv/?hl=es

1242

01/01/2018

Universidad de Alcalá (UAH)

https://www.instagram.com/uahes/

2984

01/12/2014

Universidad Pontificia Comillas (COMILLAS)

https://www.instagram.com/ucomillas

796

01/12/2014

Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (UCAR)

https://www.instagram.com/universidadcarlosiiidemadrid

859

01/07/2014

Universidad San Pablo-CEU (UCEU)

https://www.instagram.com/universidad_ceu_sanpablo/

950

01/12/2016

Universidad Alfonso X El Sabio (UAX)

https://www.instagram.com/uaxuniversidad/

1657

01/05/2015

Universidad Antonio de Nebrija (UANE)

https://www.instagram.com/universidad_nebrija/

3188

01/10/2012

Universidad Europea de Madrid (UEM)

https://www.instagram.com/ueuropea/

2011

01/07/2013

Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (URJC)

https://www.instagram.com/urjc_uni/?hl=es

375

01/10/2015

Universidad Camilo José Cela (UCJC)

https://www.instagram.com/ucjc_universidad/?hl=es

1319

01/02/2016

Universidad Francisco de Vitoria (UFV)

https://www.instagram.com/ufvmadrid/

2418

01/03/2013

Universidad Internacional Menéndez Pelayo (UIMP)

https://www.instagram.com/uimp1/

2533

01/06/2016

Universidad a Distancia de Madrid (UDIMA)

https://www.instagram.com/universidad_udima

622

01/10/2014

ESIC Universidad (ESIC)

https://www.instagram.com/esicuniversity?igsh=MW00YXlnbDY2M2lrag%3D%3D

350

01/03/2021

Universidad Internacional Villanueva (UV)

https://www.instagram.com/UniversidadVillanueva/

1009

01/05/2016

CUNEF Universidad (CUNEF)

https://www.instagram.com/cunef/

1542

01/03/2014

Universidad Internacional de la Empresa (UNIE)

https://www.instagram.com/UNIEUniversidad/

383

01/02/2022

Universidad de Diseño, Innovación y Tecnología (UDIT)

https://www.instagram.com/udit.es/

2117

01/03/2012

Universidad de Navarra (UN)

https://www.instagram.com/universidaddenavarra

1834

01/09/2012

Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA)

https://www.instagram.com/upna.nup/

850

01/05/2016

Universidad de Alicante (UA)

https://www.instagram.com/ua_universidad

859

01/06/2014

Universitat de València (Estudi General) (UV)

https://www.instagram.com/universitatvalencia/

1022

01/11/2017

Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV)

https://www.instagram.com/instaUPV

1896

01/04/2013

Universidad Jaume I de Castellón (UJI)

https://www.instagram.com/ujiuniversitat/

4121

01/02/2017

Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche (UMH)

https://www.instagram.com/universidadmh

2893

01/09/2013

Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU (UCH)

https://www.instagram.com/uchceu_universidad

1688

01/06/2014

Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir (UCV)

https://www.instagram.com/UniversidadCatolicaValencia/

1289

01/04/2013

Universitat Internacional Valenciana (VIU)

https://www.instagram.com/universidadviu/

1363

01/01/2017

Universidad Europea de Valencia (UEV)

https://www.instagram.com/ueuropea/ 

2011

01/07/2013

Universidad de Extremadura (UEX)

https://www.instagram.com/uni.extremadura/

978

01/09/2020

Universidad de Santiago de Compostela (USC)

https://www.instagram.com/universidade_usc

1488

01/04/2018

Universidad de A Coruña (UDC)

https://www.instagram.com/udc_oficial/

2819

01/03/2019

Universidad de Vigo (UVI)

https://www.instagram.com/universidadedevigo/

264

01/06/2016

Universidad Intercontinental de la Empresa (UIE)

https://www.instagram.com/uieuniversidad/

302

01/03/2022

Universitat de les Illes Balears (UIB)

https://www.instagram.com/uibuniversitat/

1622

01/08/2013

Universidad de La Rioja (UR)

https://www.instagram.com/unirioja/

5082

01/04/2015

Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR)

https://www.instagram.com/uniruniversidad/

2569

01/01/2016

Universidad de Oviedo (UOV)

https://www.instagram.com/universidad_de_oviedo/

5058

01/02/2020

Universidad de Murcia (UMU)

https://www.instagram.com/umu/

3385

01/06/2016

Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena (UPCT)

https://www.instagram.com/upctoficial/

2306

01/08/2015

Universidad Católica San Antonio (UCAM)

https://www.instagram.com/ucam_universidad

2748

01/02/2014

 

Appendix 2 (Information on the hashtags in Spanish used throughout the text)

Hashtag

Meaning

#universidad

University

#unileon

University of Leon

#leonesp

Leon Spain

#estudiantes

Students

#ulpgc

University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria

#master

Master's degree

#sevilla

Seville (capital of Andalusia)

#madrid

Madrid (capital of Spain)

#somosupm

We are UPM (Polytechnic University of Madrid)

#somuji

We are (UJI) (Jaume I University)

#somosuned

We are UNED (National University of Distance Education)

#universidaddesevilla

University of Seville

#uclm

University of Castilla-La Mancha

#ucavila

Catholic University of Ávila

#malaga

Malaga (province of Andalusia or capital of the province)

#barcelona

Barcelona (capital of Catalonia)

#investigacion

Research

#grado

Undergraduate studies

#ciencia

Science

#tecnologia

Technology

#deusto360

University of Deusto (360º)

#nosoloingenieria

Not only engineering

#instaupv

Insta UPV (Polytechnic University of Valencia)

#educacion

Education

#formacion

Training

#cultura

Culture

#venalacomplutense

Come to the Complutense (Complutense University of Madrid)

#yosoycomplutense

I am Complutense (Complutense University of Madrid)

#ingenieria

Engineering

#arquitectura

Architecture

#diseño

Design

#igualdad

Equality

#8m

March 8

#diainternacionaldelamujer

International women's day

#unir

International University of La Rioja

#universitat

University (in Catalan)

#uab

Autonomous University of Barcelona

#uvic

University of Vic (Central University of Catalonia)

#unibarcelona

University Barcelona

#cerdanyola

Cerdanyola (a city in Catalonia)

#campusuab

Campus UAB (Autonomous University of Barcelona)

#estudiar

Study

#nebrija

Nebrija University

#lacomplutense

The Complutense (Complutense University of Madrid)

#universidadnebrija

University Nebrija

#ucjc

Camilo Jose Cela University

#ucm

Complutense University of Madrid

#uni

Uni (short for university)

#upct

Polytechnic University of Cartagena

#alumnos

Students

#cartagena

Cartagena (a city in the Region of Murcia)

#estudiante

Student

#diadellibro

Book day

#uniovi

University of Oviedo

#campusuji

Campus UJI (Jaume I University)

#huelva

Huelva (province of Andalusia or capital of the province)

 

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS, FUNDING AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Contributions of the authors:

Conceptualization: Zarrabeitia Bilbao, Enara. Software: Zarrabeitia Bilbao, Enara. Validation: Alvarez Meaza, Izaskun and Rio Belver, Rosa María. Formal analysis: Zarrabeitia Bilbao, Enara and Alvarez Meaza, Izaskun. Healing of data: Zarrabeitia Bilbao, Enara. Writing-Preparation of the draft original: Zarrabeitia Bilbao, Enara. Editorial-Re- vision and Edition: Zarrabeitia Bilbao, Enara. Supervision: Alvarez Meaza, Izaskun and Rio Belver, Rosa María. Project Management: Zarrabeitia Bilbao, Enara and Alvarez Meaza, Izaskun. All authors have read and accepted the published version of the manuscript: Zarrabeitia Bilbao, Enara; Alvarez Meaza, Izaskun, Rio Belver, Rosa María.

Funding: This research received funding from the T4BSS (Technology for Business, Society and Sustainability) Basque Government consolidated research group (IT1691-22).


AUTHORS:

Enara Zarrabeitia-Bilbao

University of the Basque Country.

Engineer in Industrial Management and PhD by the University of the Basque Country. She is an Associate Professor in the Bilbao School of Engineering (University of the Basque Country).

enara.zarrabeitia@ehu.eus

Index H: 10

Orcid ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2347-3885 

Scopus ID: https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57191443752&origin=resultslist 

Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.es/citations?user=uO6hnUAAAAAJ&hl=es&oi=ao 

ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Enara-Zarrabeitia 

Dialnet: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/metricas/investigadores/2542912 

 

Izaskun Alvarez-Meaza

University of the Basque Country.

Izaskun Alvarez-Meaza has a PhD in Engineering, specializing in Industrial Engineering. After four years in a Technological Center, he is currently working as Associate Professor in the Bilbao School of Engineering (University of the Basque Country).

izaskun.alvarez@ehu.eus

Index H: 13

Orcid ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2110-0719 

Scopus ID: https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57208712548&origin=resultslist 

Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.es/citations?user=LsarBngAAAAJ&hl=es&oi=ao 

ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Izaskun-Meaza 

 

Rosa María Río-Belver

University of the Basque Country.

Rosa María Río-Belver has a PhD in Industrial Engineering, specializing in Organization. MSc in Environmental Sciences and Technology (UPV/EHU) and Msc in Innovation Management (AENOR). She is a Full Professor at the University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU.

rosamaria.rio@ehu.eus

Index H: 17

Orcid ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4244-9098 

Scopus ID: https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57204554174&origin=resultslist 

Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.es/citations?user=jBbm9GoAAAAJ&hl=es&oi=ao 

ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Rosa-Rio-Belver 

Dialnet: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/autor?codigo=2287724 

OpenAlex: https://explore.openalex.org/authors/A5018977967 

RELATED ARTICLES:

Brandariz Portela, T., Ortega Fernández, E., & Padilla Castillo, G. (2023). Los millenials y la honestidad como valor de marca. El caso Goiko en Instagram. Revista de Comunicación de la SEECI, 56, 214-238. https://doi.org/10.15198/seeci.2023.56.e820

Carpio Jiménez, L., Ayala-Armas, E., & Puertas-Hidalgo, R. (2024). Impacto y alcance en Marketing de Influencers: Análisis de la campaña Goal of the Century de la Marca Hyundai en Instagram. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 9, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-882

García, M. G., & Cortés, L. C. (2024). Influencers virtuales de apariencia humana como forma de comunicación online: el caso de Lil Miquela y Lu do Magalu en Instagram. Revista de Comunicación23(1), 119-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.26441/rc23.1-2024-3453

Moreno Cabanillas, A., & Castillero Ostio, E. (2023). Comunicación política y redes sociales: análisis de la comunicación en Instagram de la campaña electoral del 13F. Vivat Academia, 156, 199-222. https://doi.org/10.15178/va.2023.156.e1461

Virós-Martín, C., Jiménez-Morales, M., & Montaña-Blasco, M. (2025). Adolescentes, TikTok e Instagram: percepciones sobre el impacto de las tecnologías digitales en su vida social. Revista de Comunicación24(1), 519-538. http://dx.doi.org/10.26441/rc24.1-2025-3774

 


[1] Although the conventional IQR factor for identifying outliers is 1.5, a more conservative threshold (IQR = 3) was applied in this study to exclude only the most extreme values. This approach was intended to preserve the integrity of the dataset and to reduce the risk of introducing bias into the analysis.

[2] In the case of hashtags, diacritical marks (accents) were removed, all characters were converted to lowercase, and empty or null hashtags were excluded from the dataset.