doi.org/10.4185/rlcs-2020-1453
Article

The subjects of creativity and strategy in degrees in Communication in Spain
Las asignaturas de creatividad y estrategia en los Grados en Comunicación en España

Araceli Castelló-Martínez1
1University of Alicante. Spain

Abstract
Training in competency-based learning model that the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) established is focused on university education to adapt to the needs of the occupational market. This article examines the creative and strategic skills between competencies and profiles proposed by ANECA (2005) for Degrees in Communication in Spain. In a second phase, a review of the subjects related to the creative strategy within curricula of degrees in Communication is made, from a sample of 125 degrees and 202 subjects. The results demonstrate the limited presence of the creative strategy in the curricula in Communication, being the Degrees in Advertising and Public Relations where it more frequently appears, as well as the lack of consensus in the appellation of the subjects.

Keywords: communication, advertising and public relations, creativity, strategy, creative strategy.

Resumen
El modelo de enseñanza basado en la formación en competencias que instauró el Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior (EEES) está enfocado a adecuar la formación universitaria a las necesidades del mercado laboral. El presente artículo analiza las competencias creativa y estratégica entre las competencias y los perfiles propuestos por ANECA (2005) para los Grados en Comunicación en España. En una segunda fase, se realiza una revisión de las asignaturas relacionadas con la estrategia creativa dentro los planes de estudio de las titulaciones en Comunicación, a partir de una muestra de 125 titulaciones y 202 asignaturas. Los resultados demuestran la escasa presencia de la estrategia creativa en los planes de estudio en Comunicación, siendo los Grados en Publicidad y Relaciones Públicas las titulaciones en las que más aparece, así como la falta de consenso existente en las nomenclaturas de las asignaturas.

Palabras clave: comunicación, publicidad y relaciones públicas, creatividad, estrategia, estrategia creativa.

Correspondencia
Araceli Castelló-Martínez. University of Alicante. Spain.
araceli.castello@ua.es

Received: 04/12/2019.
Accepted: 03/05/2020.
Published: 31/07/2020

Financing
The research presented in this article is part of the research group “Communication and Specific Audiences”, financed by the University of Alicante and carried out under the guidance of PhD. Professor Victoria Tur-Viñes.

How to cite this article / Standard reference
Castelló-Martínez, A. (2020). The subjects of creativity and strategy in degrees in Communication in Spain. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, (77), 143-178. https://www.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2020-1453

Contents
1. Introduction. 1.1. Competencies within the framework of the European Higher Education Area. 1.2. Creative and strategic competency in Communication studies. 1.3. Creativity and strategy in professional profiles of Communication studies. 1.4. Creativity and advertising strategy teaching. 1.5. Research on the teaching of advertising creativity. 1.6. The subject Creative Strategy and Conceptualization in the Degree of Advertising and Public Relations from the University of Alicante. 2. Methodology.  2.1. Methodological strategies. 2.2. Population and sample. 2.3. Data collection tools and procedure. 3. Results. 4. Discussion. 5. Conclusions. 6. References 7. Related references.

Translation by Carlos Javier Rivas Quintero (University of the Andes, Mérida, Venezuela).

1. Introduction

1.1. Competencies within the framework of the European Higher Education Area

The European convergence and harmonization process within the higher education systems that started with the implementation of the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) entailed the introduction of great novelties in the approach of university education, with the objective of achieving a common ground which would favor social growth and cohesion based on the academic training of citizens. But, above all, it has led to a continuous “re-thinking” of universities (Marta-Lazo, 2009, p. 3), a reframing of the teaching methods from lecturers and a constant evaluation of the work done by students outside the classroom to adapt the subjects to a more interactive system, focused on the students’ prominence in the learning process and their utterly active participation.
The EHEA philosophy redefines the university institution task, in the context of a globalized, hypermediatized and super technified society. Quality teaching, that leaves aside the bank-like teaching [“education bancaria”] (Freire, 1995), to base on the “experiential learning” (Kolb, 1984) with professional orientation; digital tools integration, active learning pedagogic techniques focused on the student and the promotion of international mobility are its main features.
On the other hand, the approach of the EHEA is aimed to the employability of the student, reclaiming the eminently practical nature of studies, demanding a methodology based on learning how to learn whatever it takes to achieve professional performance, which has favored Higher Education to be nearer the corporate environment and it is inspired by Long Life Learning (LLL)( ), [1] learning to continue learning during our lifetime: “An approach requested due to the new necessities of the Knowledge Society, in which a continuous learning update that allows the adaptation to fast changes and transformations that are occurring is necessary” (Pérez, Vadillo and McMahon, 2011, pp. 68-69).
The new teaching models at the core of the EHEA are characterized by being focused on the autonomous learning of the student expressed in competencies for the corresponding professional profile and tutored by professors with a cooperative approach of the teaching-learning process (Fernández, 2005).
In current society the learning model, on which the academic system is based, bets on the acquisition of competencies for employability. The abilities and skills that foster competencies and the bet on ICTs in the teaching-learning process oblige the student to “learn by doing”, that is why traditional teaching methods must be substituted by the so-called active methodologies, in which the students take the active leading role in the knowledge acquisition.
University training approaches to the occupational market requirements are one of the objectives of the syllabi: to promote a more direct and effective relation between university education and professional activity. Training based on competencies, which aims to qualify the student to successfully practice the professional activity in accordance to the degree qualification, therefore, highlights “the close relation between university and corporate reality”, betting on “a more practical education and problem solving skills simulating a real life situation of the labor market” (Sierra and Cabezuelo, 2010, p. 32).
The Tuning pilot project (González and Wagenaar, 2003) was carried out in 2003 to establish a methodology that would allow the alignment of the European educational structures in specific disciplines -Mathematics, geology, corporate studies, history and education sciences-, in which 70 European universities participated. This project emphasizes the necessity of training in competencies and developing capacities and knowledge in students beyond what is purely technical, which led to the identification of 32 competencies, labeled cross-disciplinary or generic, that every majored must acquire in a higher or lower degree depending on their studies. Marta-Lazo (2012, p. 19) classifies cross-disciplinary or generic competencies, included in this project, in three categories: instrumental, interpersonal and systematic.

[1] The Long Life Learning (LLL) concept was promoted by UNESCO after the 1996 report presentation by Delors “Learning: The treasure within”, in which educational reforms are urged and for the new pedagogical policies to be oriented in “education throughout life”, focused on four pillars: “learning how to know, learning how to do, learning how to live together” and “learning how to be”.

Table 1. Classification of cross-disciplinary or generic competencies in the Tuning Project.


Source: authors’ own creation based on Marta-Lazo (2012, p. 19).

The 32 generic competencies proposed in the Tuning Project were used by ANECA to elaborate the White Papers of the different degrees. We have to add, to these competencies, the specific ones, particular of each one of the majors.

1.2. Creative and strategic competency in Communication studies

Even if the creative and strategic thinking is cross-disciplinary and can be extended to all the future knowledge of the professional in communication, among the listed competencies by ANECA (2005) for each degree in Communication, some allude directly to creativity and strategy. In the case of Audiovisual Communication, among the specific competencies there are (ANECA, 2005, pp. 229-270):

Within the professional, academic and other competencies of Audiovisual Communication, some others linked to the subjects under analysis are also identified:

Among the specific competencies of Journalism studies proposed by ANECA (2005, pp. 192-225) we find two related to these subjects:

Among the professional competencies for this degree, the skill at experiencing and innovating through knowledge and the use of techniques and methods implemented to the processes of quality and self-evaluation enhancement is also identified, as well as the abilities for autonomous learning, the adaptability to changes and daily improvement through creativity. 
Focusing on the degree in Advertising and Public Relations, creativity appears in four competencies, as shown in Table 2.

Table 2. Competencies related to creativity in Advertising and Public Relations degree.


Source: authors’ own creation based on ANECA (2005, pp. 273-296).

There is an aspect worth noticing here: even if in the 4th academic competency no specific ambit is determined, it is in the 9th specific knowledge and in the 8th professional knowledge, which have an impact in the sense that the implementation of the creative thinking must be executed in “the process of advertising communication: schools, methods and techniques” and are linked to the advertising profession -“Their main functions comprise the elaboration of basic advertising pieces and the supervision of their final production”-. That way, it is necessary to disinherit creativity as an exclusive aptitude of the creative phase of the message in the advertising process and highlight it as an indispensable cornerstone in the design of not only the advertising strategies, but also in the public relations ones, particularly, and communication ones in general.
These guidelines have caused creativity to be still closely related to the advertising field within the syllabi, despite the subject Creativity and Innovation in communication, especially in advertising and public relations, proposed by ANECA, mentioning these two fields. As highlighted by Estanyol (2012, p. 16), a majority of the subjects regarding creativity that are offered in the degrees in Advertising and Public Relations indicate in their descriptions to be focused on advertising (46.67%) and only a minority (1.66%) are specifically focused on their implementation in public relations.
Simultaneously, we also find knowledge directly related to strategy between the competencies of the studies in Advertising and Public Relations, as seen in Table 3. In this case, with the exception of the 12th specific competency -in which advertising messages are alluded-, the field of activity is not specified in the rest. We could not find academic competencies directly related to the strategic approach.

Table 3. Competencies related to strategy in the Advertising and Public Relations degree.


Source: authors’ own creation based on ANECA (2005, pp. 273-296).

Along with the competencies for each degree, the White Paper of the degrees in Communication elaborated by ANECA (2005) incorporated the minimum formative contents for the degrees in Audiovisual Communication, Journalism and Advertising, and Public Relations, organized by subjects from which abilities and skills derive. Based on this systematization of the competencies for future professionals of communication, ANECA (2005) also proposes a set of basic professional profiles for each degree.
If we examine the presence of creativity and strategy among the basic subjects in the Degrees in Communication, we find that in the degree in Audiovisual Communication there is a subject related, in the degree in Journalism appears none and in Advertising and Public Relations studies two subjects are indicated. Regarding the professional profiles, we find two profiles related to the degree in Advertising and Public Relations.
As for the case of the degree in Audiovisual Communication, among the basic subjects the following is indicated: Techniques and creative processes of production and postproduction. The minimum formative contents for this subject are:

This subject has an estimated total amount of 750-900 student working hours, being practical (40%) and personal work (40%) the most important activities. The skills, abilities and competencies to acquire based on this knowledge are:

Within the design of the syllabus for Advertising and Public Relations proposed by ANECA (2005), we find a subject related to creativity and another one to strategy: Creativity and Innovation in communication, especially advertising and the ones of public relations, and Foundations and techniques of strategy in communication (especially advertising and public relations), respectively. For the first case, the minimum formative contents in the subject established by ANECA (2005: 337-338) for the Degrees in Advertising and Public Relations, with 650-780 estimated working hours and a total personal work of 40%, are the following:

Based on these objectives, ANECA (2005, pp. 337-338) identifies the following skills, abilities and competencies to acquire (level and profundity):

Table 4. Skills, abilities and competencies to acquire (level and profundity).


Source: authors’ own creation based on ANECA (2005, pp. 337-338).

In the subject Foundations and techniques of strategy in communication (especially advertising and public relations), with 375-450 estimated working hours and 40% of personal work, the following knowledge is described in detail:

The skills, abilities and competencies derived from this knowledge are:

1.3. Creativity and strategy in professional profiles of Communication studies

The professional profiles established by ANECA (2005, pp. 227-228) for the degree of Audiovisual Communication are: 1. Director, scriptwriter and audiovisual filmmaker; 2. Producer and audiovisual operator; 3. Design production and sound and visual postproduction and; 4. Lecturer researcher and expert in visual studies. Therefore, none of these profiles are directly linked to creativity and strategy.
The same thing happens with the professional profiles established by ANECA (2005, pp. 191-192) for Journalism studies, since no professional profile is directly linked to creativity and strategy: 1. Journalistic information editor in any type of medium; 2. Editor or press responsible or institutional communication; 3. Lecturer researcher or communication consultant and; 4. Web portal manager and contents editor.
Due to the existent variety of specializations in the professional and occupational marketing, communication and advertising market world, the degree in Advertising and Public Relations is characterized for having the most differentiated professional profiles with each other (ANECA, 2005, pp. 271-272): 1. Communication director, researcher and advertising and public relations strategic consultant; 2. Researchers, planners and media buyers; 3. Copywriter and designer and; 4. Corporate communication manager.
Therefore, we find two profiles connected to the subjects of creativity and strategy. The researchers and strategic consultants identify the specific role that communication has to play within each organization and in the marketing actions. In both cases, they define the communicative strategies in accordance to the objectives of the advertisers. They plan both the necessary ad hoc researches so that they can define the fundamental pillars of the campaigns and the development and implementation of the very campaigns they supervise, execute and control. For that, they rely on their market knowledge and the communication, monitoring and control tools (ANECA, 2005, pp. 271-272).
In the case of the copywriter and designer, he/she is the specialized professional in advertising creativity in all kinds of platforms, from the conceptualization and visualization of the advertising idea to its adaptation and integration to the different mediums. These specializations can be identified as: copywriter, art director, editor and webmaster -creativity in web structure-. The task of executing even the final art and controlling the physical production of the platforms is responsibility of the production and traffic experts (ANECA, 2005, pp. 272).
The competencies of the professional in advertising and public relations described by ANECA (2005, pp. 229-298) have been examined in order to analyze which are the most closely related ones to each of these two profiles. They are shown in Table 5:

Table 5. Competencies of the strategic consultant and copywriter.


Source: authors’ own creation based on ANECA (2005, pp. 229-298).

Among the specific competencies we considered that the knowledge of the creative thinking methods and the knowledge and analysis of the basic psychological processes are common competencies in both profiles. As for the academic competencies, the consultant and strategic researcher figure would have all the ones proposed by ANECA (2005). In the section “other”, both profiles would share all the competencies.
Within the creative professional profiles, it is important to indicate the existence of more concrete different profiles, for instance: creative director, copy and art director. Tur-Viñes (2008) claims a copywriter in communication definition that leaves aside the restriction of what is inherently from the advertising realm in order to act upon the reality of his/her functions. Based on the fact that ANECA (2005) associates the copywriter profile to the one of the designer, as the author states:

1.4. Creativity and advertising strategy teaching

We reviewed the contributions made by several authors about teaching the creativity and advertising strategies subjects. Muela (2012) highlights the importance of the study of the creative process implemented in advertising strategy in the lecturing of this subject:

Martín (1989) also analyzes the legislation regarding university lecturing to highlight the role creativity has in higher-level education:

Creativity is not an explicit objective of universities, but just a few number of people will discuss that it should be one. Furthermore, it is implicit in all the subjects.
The 1983 University Reform establishes as functions of the university in article 1.2:

Even objectives that haven’t been formulated that clearly and that are intrinsic to university, presuppose it (…) the development and acute transmission of science poses a challenge that needs to be solved with creative audacity (…) all the functions of a university are, somehow, and ought to be even more, paths leading to creativity, but especially to research and learning by discovering. (pp. 35-36)

Another perspective about the current stage of creativity in advertising teaching is presented by De la Torre and Violant (2003, p. 22) who, instead of focusing on students, study the professor. These authors analyze the didactic strategies of university teaching staff with the purpose of describing the impact and level of satisfaction of students in the face of the implementation of creative and varied strategies and capable of “inspiring students to learn”.
For her part, Tur-Viñes (2008,) describes the qualitative leap that the adaptation of the subject creativity in the Degree in Advertising and Public Relations entailed to the EHEA.

Creativity would still remain a core subject but it would be now implemented to the creation process of commercial messages, not only the advertising and public relations ones taking the media into account. There would be greater emphasis on disciplinary knowledge and, on the capacities level, the ability for analysis would be observed -since it is from the first cycle- so there would be an impact on the capacity of generating, presenting and defending, in a coherent and appropriate way, strategies of commercial communication. (pp. 158-159)

We find examples of the implementation of cooperative learning and of new teaching techniques in subjects related to the subject of advertising creativity, as in the case of Creative Strategies in Advertising in the Degree in Advertising and Public Relations of Juan Carlos University (Muela, 2012) or Creative Thinking in the degree in Communication of Open University of Catalonia (Sivera-Bello, 2016). In the first case, the innovation teaching project proved that cooperative work based on the puzzle technique helps facilitate learning and increases knowledge of professional reality, its stakeholders and participants regarding advertising creativity (Muela, 2012).
When examining the teaching of strategy in this Degree, we noticed this strategy is limited to Advertising and Public Relations studies. We did not find in the White Paper by ANECA (2005) of the other two degrees in Communication any allusions to training in this field, which translates into a clear absence of subjects with these contents (Torres, 2010).

Despite the saturation offer of communication studies in our country, the contents or subjects related to the strategic discipline turn out to be scarce. The tendency to replicate the previous models has led the process of adaptation not to solve this situation. What is clear is that the competencies and capacities of the communication student regarding strategic matters are highly valued in all the new syllabi. This translates into an increase in the use of the strategy term and, more specifically, when relating to the advertising area. (p. 307)
This reality can be justified with the objective importance that the strategic training in the studies to which we are concretely referring to have, from two points of view: the one of strategic planning and the one of strategic creation, precisely the two basic pillars for the development of advertising and public relations activity, although it is true that this statement depends on the stance we take when speaking of this strategy (p. 312).

From this point of view, the degrees in the communication ambit in Spain are characterized by the implementation disparity of the studies of strategy (Torres, 2010, p. 311). The strategy term is implemented by different authors, researchers and professionals in advertising in almost all the activities that can be performed in this field. That way, we are talking about “advertising general strategy”, “media strategy”, “creative strategy”, “message strategy”, “copy strategy”, etc. This entails, if we are referring to strategy in the advertising ambit, some confusion about what elements are included in it. Therefore, we find that, in addition to the increased use of the term, it is in advertising where it is used in a more subjective manner (Pérez-González, 1989).
While an important number of authors claim that advertising strategy would be the creation stage of the “what” or content of the message of advertising communication, in accordance to the objectives assigned, for another group of authors in advertising strategy the creation of the “what” should be at the creative strategy (Davara, 1994, p. 189), which is why the phrase “advertising strategy” would be reserved to define the choosing of work methods; that is, a previous step to action (García-Uceda, 2001).
From this knowledge several basic concepts of strategic theory were gathered: decision making, messages creation strategies and design of specific strategies. Additionally, these are the elements in which the strategic theory has exhibited a greater development. First, the relation between making the decisions and foresight; secondly, the strategic models of the advertising ambit that evolved from the strategies based on the product -Unique Selling Proposition by Reeves-, to the current ones of positioning and brand image (Kapferer, 1997); last, we are in the process of strategic advertising planning as a way of creating the communicative plans of institutions (Pérez-González, 1989).
Torres (2010, p. 315) concluded that the wide formative offer in communication does not meet, however, the training necessities in the strategic discipline ambit. Nevertheless, what is clear is the professional-oriented direction of teaching communication strategies.

1.5. Research on the teaching of advertising creativity

Finally, we point out the research on teaching creativity at universities carried out by Alegre and Roca (2012) due to the extensive bibliographic examination they did, dividing the studies into two big groups: analysis and methodology. Within the analysis group they included all the articles that studied the state of creativity teaching, normally using the quantitative methodology through questionnaires administered to professors. The methodology group contains all those articles that describe the development of the advertising creativity subject, normally based on the description of the very own teaching experience of the author. With this examination, the authors came to the following conclusions (Alegre and Roca, 2012, p. 75) about teaching advertising creativity at universities:

The work by Alegre and Roca (2012) is an adaptation for the Spanish territory from the research by Stuhlfaut and Berman (2009) in The United States. In their research, Stuhlfaut and Berman selected a sample of 44 universities out of 145 -that is, 30%- of the existing ones in The United States in which programs of advertising and public relations are taught. These were selected from three lists that appeared in A Century of Advertising Education (Ross and Richards, 2008). They examined the web pages of the universities to spot the creative strategy subjects, also including the ones of advertising art, copywriting, and leaving aside subjects for campaigns elaboration, general creativity and book -portfolio development-. The authors understood that advertising art direction and copywriting are branches of creative strategy.
Alegre and Roca (2012) identified 286 subjects for advertising creativity in the Advertising and Public Relations Degrees in Spain. Based on the contents and objectives observed in the subjects analyzed, they established a set of common descriptors (Alegre and Roca, 2012, p. 90) [2], identifying segments that are faithful to the idiosyncrasy of the creative department in the advertising agency:

One of the conclusions these authors came to was that there was a great diversity in the names of the subjects, with 17 names for the writing subjects, 21 for the ones of art and 37 for those of creative strategy.

[2] It is important to note that in the research project by Alegre and Roca (2012) graphic design subjects are not included. Despite these being gathered during the sample collection, with aims of delimiting the study, the authors opted for analyzing only the subjects of art direction. Even if it is undeniable that creativity is a crucial factor in the development of a design, there is an open debate about the exact role it plays (Dineen and Collins, 2004: 1). Avoiding taking part in the debate, the authors decided to stick to the four subjects described. However, it is necessary to point out that art direction, graphic design and similar subjects have a great relevance in the syllabi.

1.6. The subject Creative Strategy and Conceptualization in the Degree of Advertising and Public Relations from the University of Alicante

In this section, we are going to use the subject Creative Strategy and Conceptualization in the Degree of Advertising and Public Relations of the University of Alicante, as an example subject for the field of study under analysis and from which we are presenting the research thereupon described. This subject, mandatory in the third course, belongs to the module titled Creativity in advertising communication and public relations. The descriptor of the module indicates that( ) [3]:

[3] Drawn from the Degree syllabus: http://bit.ly/grado-publicidad-ua

First, it covers the knowledge of the concept of creativity, the existing explanatory theories as well as the type of thinking that favors creative productions; secondly, the analysis of advertising as a form of informative-persuasive communication and its implications in the language field; third, according to its position in the syllabus, the knowledge of the strategic process that determines creative decisions is addressed, as well as the main genres and resources that lead to a conceptualization, understood as the expression of the message, and the adaptation of the concepts to different media. As for the optional subjects, they delve into the knowledge and development of necessary abilities to make communication more effective through its proper writing, visualization and composition, as well as the synergistic use of the emergent forms of non-conventional communication.

In addition to Creative Strategy and Conceptualization, the subjects incorporated in this module, with each having 6 ECTS-credits, are:

These subjects within the syllabus are organized in a way that allows the student to immerse in the creative process from a macro level -studying the creativity concept and the creation mechanisms- to a micro level -in subjects like Advertising Language, Advertising Texts Creation and Advertising Art. Creativity is implemented to the verbal and visual expression of the persuasive message-, ranging over the Creative Strategy and Conceptualization subject, which is the nexus between both levels when delving into the creativity conceptualization in the process of strategy in persuasive communication. This strategic process that determines creative decisions is previous to the creation of the iconic and verbal part of the message.
The optional subjects New Advertising Forms and Advertising Poster introduce the implementation of creativity to the use of the emerging forms of non-conventional communication and delve into the visual component of the message, respectively. The subject that has a closer linkage with Creative Strategy and Conceptualization is Foundations of Creativity.
The inherent and specific nature of the subject Creative Strategy and Conceptualization in relation to the scientific field, to which it belongs, is the combination of creativity with strategy, which makes it unique within the syllabus in the Degree in Advertising and Public Relations of the University of Alicante. The study of creativity from a strategic approach -persuasive communication works on the basis of a set of objectives intended to be met providing the most convenient solution to a communication problem- and the study of strategy from a creative approach -if one of the premises of any strategy is the fact of having a set of resources available, sometimes limited, then it is precisely for this reason why sharpening the cunning and the innovation capacity is necessary- is what makes Creative Strategy and Conceptualization an essential subject in the training of future professionals in Advertising and Public Relations.

2. Methodology

2.1. Methodological strategies

The main objective of this study is to analyze the presence of subjects for creativity and strategy in the degrees of Communication in Spain. This research is based on the inputs analyzed in the bibliographic examination aforementioned, especially the one of Alegre and Roca (2012), and the following specific objectives are proposed:

The main hypothesis highlights the scarce variety of existing subjects in the Degrees in Communication that combine the study of creativity and strategy. For their part, the subjects for creativity are more popular than the strategy ones and it is in the degrees in Advertising and Public Relation in which both have a greater prominence and presence. Additionally, the subjects for creativity and/or strategy in the Degrees in Communication are characterized by nomenclature diversity.

2.2. Population and sample

To achieve our objectives and test the validity of the hypothesis, the study was based on the course offering for Communication in Spain, with an analysis based on the syllabi of 125 degrees from 61 study centers. These 125 degrees represent 13.5% if we compare them with the total number of degrees offered in Spain in Social and Legal Sciences, 927 (Education, Culture and Sports Ministry, 2016: 7). Out of the 125 degrees analyzed, 62 are from public universities and 63 from private institutions. In total, the degrees sample comes from 32 public universities and 29 private centers.
The 61 universities for the sample can be seen in Table 6, the autonomous community to which they pertain, the type of education center, the faculty in which the degrees in Communication are taught and the number of degrees offered.

Table 6. Communication Degrees in Spanish University Centers.


Source: authors’ own creation based on the data of the web pages of the universities.

According to the number of degrees in Communication, there is only one center that offers 5 degrees in this field: the private Ramon Llull University. There are 7 centers that offer 4 degrees –six of them are private-, 13 universities have 3 and 2 degrees and there are 27 (44.3%) centers that offer only one degree in communication. Therefore, the median of degrees by center is 2, although the mode is just one degree. The detail is in Table 7 and in Graphic 1.

Table 7. Number of degrees by University.


Source: authors’ own creation based on the data on the web pages of the universities.

Source: authors’ own creation based on the data on the web pages of the universities.


Graphic 1. Number of centers in relation to the number of degrees in communication.

The degrees identified are organized by categories, based on the three degrees in Communication described by ANECA (2005): Audiovisual Communication, Journalism and Advertising, and Public Relations. Furthermore, two additional categories are added, to cover the Degrees in Communication as well as other related degrees.
By category, as seen in Table 8, out of the 125 degrees in Communication identified in the 61 centers, 14 correspond to Communication (11.2%), 37 to Audiovisual Communication (29.6%), 33 to Journalism (26.4%), 32 are for Advertising and Public Relations (25.6%) and 9 for other related degrees (7.2%) -related to protocol, design, events organization, digital communication and/or cinema-That way, the three branches within the Communication Sciences identified in Spain since 1991 are the ones that represent the biggest offer for study opportunities in Communication.
Based on this breakdown, an analysis of the subjects included in the syllabi related to the Creative Strategy and Conceptualization subject was carried out. The analysis was based on the nomenclature of the subjects, establishing three levels of correspondence:

In total, 202 subjects were identified: 9 subjects in level 1, 123 subjects in level 2 and 70 subjects in level 3.

2.3. Data collection tools and procedure

The data was collected between May and July of 2017 through the web pages of the universities, getting access to the syllabi of the degrees of the sample to identify the subjects related based on the levels previously mentioned. Therefore, the collection of data was carried out through Internet access and from the analysis of the nomenclature of the subjects included in the 125 degrees. 

3. Results

The 202 subjects identified come from the 79 degrees -that is, 63.2% of the degrees analyzed, with a median of 2.6 subjects per degree-, while there are 46 Degrees which do not have subjects with names related to Creative Strategy and Conceptualization, offered by 34 different centers. None of these 46 degrees without a linkage to creative strategy and conceptualization correspond to the category for advertising and public relations: 16 are from audiovisual communication, 21 form journalism, 4 from communication and 5 from others, as shown in Table 8.

Table 8. Degrees without related subjects.


Source: authors’ own creation based on the data of the web pages of the universities.

On the contrary, the breakdown for the 79 degrees with subjects related to creative strategy and conceptualization is shown in Table 9.

Table 9. Degrees with subjects related to creative strategy and conceptualization.


Source: authors’ own creation based on the data from the web pages of the universities.

In total, 62.9% of the identified subjects are found in the degrees in Advertising and Public Relations. The 32 degrees sample in Advertising and Relations have subjects related in some of the three levels identified, which implies a median of 4 subjects per degree. Additionally, the 9 level 1 subjects come from the Degrees in Advertising and Public Relations. 60.2% of the level 2 subjects and 62.9% of the level 3 subjects are in this category of degrees. From Table 10 to Table 14, the breakdown of subjects related to creative strategy and conceptualization is shown for each degree category. 

Table 10. Degrees in Audiovisual Communication whose syllabi include related subjects.


Source: authors’ own creation based on the data from the web pages of the universities.

Table 11. Degrees in Journalism whose syllabi include related subjects.


Source: authors’ own creation based on the data from the web pages of the universities.

Table 12. Degrees in Advertising and Public Relations whose syllabi include related subjects.


Source: authors’ own creation based on the data from the web pages of the universities.

Table 13. Degrees in Communication whose syllabi include related subjects.


Source: authors’ own creation based on the data from the web pages of the universities.

Table 14. Degrees in the category “other” whose syllabi include related subjects.


Source: authors’ own creation based on the data of the web pages of the universities.

As seen in Table 15, there are 32 Degrees in Communication that have three or more subjects related to Creative Strategy and Conceptualization. These 32 degrees make up 145 subjects related -72% of the sample-. Only 8 out of the 32 degrees are not part of the advertising and public relations category -four from the communication category and a few others from audiovisual communication, highlighted in blue in the next table-.

Table 15. Degrees whose syllabi include a higher number of subjects related to strategy and/or creativity.


Source: authors’ own creation based on the data from the web pages of the universities.

In Graphic 2, the six universities whose offered Degrees in Advertising and Public Relations include a greater number of subjects related to Creative Strategy and Conceptualization.

Source: authors’ own creation based on the data of the web pages of the universities.


Graphic 2. Main universities with subjects related to strategy and/or creativity in their syllabi for the Degrees in Advertising and Public Relations.

The Degrees in Advertising and Advertising and Public relations from the Francisco de Vitoria University and Pompeu Fabra University, respectively, are the ones having more coinciding subjects, with 10 each. Next, there are the Degree in Advertising and Public Relations from University of Girona and the Degree in Advertising Communication from European University of the Canary Islands, with 9 and 8 subjects respectively.
Analyzing the “level 1” subjects, we can affirm that there is no consensus regarding the nomenclatures of the subjects; out of the 9 identified only two have the same name -Creative Strategies in Advertising-. What does coincide is the Degree coming from both of them, from the advertising and public relations category. The names of the subjects are as follows( ) [4]:

[4] The teaching guides of the first level subjects for the 2016-2017 academic course can be looked up on this link: http://bit.ly/guias-docentes-nivel1.

In Table 16 the data of the “level 1” subjects identified is presented:

Table 16. Information about the “level 1” subjects related to strategy and/or creativity.


Source: authors’ own creation based on the data of the web pages of the universities.

As we can see, 7 of the 9 subjects are mandatory and 2 are optional. In addition, there are 7 of the 9 subjects that are in third and fourth level course and a few others correspond to 6 ECTS-Credits -As for the Francisco de Vitoria University case, the subject Ideation and Campaign Strategy has 12 credits for being yearly and the optional subject from Pompeu Fabra University equates to 4 ECTS-credits-.
Moving to “level 2” of subjects related( ), [5] there is no consensus regarding the nomenclature of the subjects, which is why the 131 subjects in this level present 90 different names. The most popular nomenclatures can be seen in Graphic 3.

[5] The lists of level 2 and 3 subjects can be checked on this link: http://bit.ly/asignaturas-niveles2y3

Source: authors’ own creation based on the data from the web pages of the universities.


Graphic 3. “Level 2” subjects with higher prominence in syllabi.

Creativity and strategy have a similar presence in the syllabi in the Degrees in Communication, at least when considering the inclusion of these words in the subject nomenclature, although there is more consensus when determining the subjects related to creativity, as shown in the previous graphic -the five subjects whose name has more consensus are the ones for creativity-.
The word creativity appears in 52 nomenclatures and the word strategy in 51. The word creation appears in 21 cases; although it is necessary to clarify it does from an approach more focused on techniques and tools: multimedia creation, radio creation, creation models, creation and design, etc. The word ideation appears in five occasions, while advertising innovation has a subject in the Degree in Advertising and Public Relations from the University of Girona.
Finally, the word conceptualization only appears once, in the subject Conceptualization in Advertising and Public Relations in the Degree in Advertising, Public Relations and Marketing from Ramon Llull University.
As for “level 3”, as seen in Graphic 4, Creative Writing and Creative Thinking are the most repeated subjects -in 7 and 5 occasions, respectively-. However, despite these two first places, it seems that in this level there is a greater agreement when naming the subjects related to strategic matters: among the 11 subjects that repeated twice or three times, 9 correspond to the strategy ambit.

Source: authors’ own creation based on the data from the web pages of the universities.


Graphic 4. “Level 3” subjects with greater presence in the syllabi.

The adjective “creative” appears in 21 occasions, while the adjective “strategic” is included in 42 subject names. In total, we find the two adjectives in 63 cases, being 62 the total amount of subjects related in this level, since in one of the courses the name of one of the subjects includes both adjectives: Strategic and Creative Planning, in the Degree in Communication from the Open University of Catalonia. This is why we have also incorporated this subject in the analysis of the syllabus of the most related subjects -in level 1- that we present hereunder.
Focusing on the subjects directly related to creative strategy and conceptualization, there are 9 subjects identified, as shown in Table 16. In addition to these identified subjects in level 1 of relation, we are also going to incorporate two level 3 subjects in this analysis, due to the close relation they have to creative strategy and conceptualization: Advertising and Public Relations Strategic Planning: the planner and Creative and Strategic Planning. 
These 11 subjects come, in large part, from Degrees in Advertising and Public Relations –only the subject Strategic and Creative planning comes from the Degree in Communication-. If the total sample of Degrees in Advertising and Public Relations was 32, only in 9 cases did we find subjects directly related to creative strategy and conceptualization, which is in 31.3% of the sample. In six cases the subjects are taught in private institutions and in five cases in public universities.
Regarding the teaching guides for the 2016-2017 academic course of these subjects, only the ones available on the web pages of the universities were analyzed. We have included the links to the online teaching guides of the subjects from the 9 degrees in Table 17 –as for the cases of the optional subject in Pompeu Fabre university and the mandatory subject in ESIC Madrid, detailed information of the subjects was not included on the webpage of the degree-.

Table 17. Links to the teaching guides of the “level 1” related subjects.


Source: author’s own creation based on the data of the webpages of the universities.

4. Discussion

Strategy and creativity are fundamental subjects in the Degree in Advertising and Public Relations, as it has been proven in the analysis of competencies, skills, abilities and professional profiles proposed by ANECA (2005) as well as in the results of the study carried out on the subjects in the Degrees in Communication: all the Degrees in the “advertising and public relations” category have subjects related in different levels.
However, even if all the identified similar subjects to Creative Strategy and Conceptualization belong to Advertising and Public Relations studies, these are scarce, since only 28% of the Degrees in “Advertising and Public Relations” category have subjects related to creative strategy and conceptualization.
For their part, neither strategy nor creativity nor the combinations of both have prominent presence in the syllabi in Degrees in Audiovisual Communication and Journalism: 63% of the identified subjects are in the “advertising and public relations” category degrees. Therefore, we can claim that the main hypothesis is verified since the existing subjects in the Degrees in Communication that combine the study of creativity and strategy are scarce.
Another aspect we have considered convenient to highlight is the necessity of an examination of the creativity subjects nomenclature, following the proposals of Stuhlfaut and Berman (2009) and Alegre and Roca (2012), corroborated with the study we have carried out on the subjects of creativity and advertising strategy, classified in different levels. This work of coordination will facilitate the performance of students in a national ambit and will contribute to the delimitation of the contents for each subject, since they occasionally overlap, especially when the subjects are part of the very own field of study.
Apart from the Brand and Campaign Creation Strategies subject, in the Degree in Advertising and Public Relations from University of Girona, that partially analyzes brand creation and management, the rest of subjects whose syllabi have been examined are focused on the creative process from the setting of advertising objectives to the evaluation of the results of the designed advertising actions, focusing mainly on two professional figures: the copywriter and planner.
Additionally, the contents of these subjects prove that advertising creativity today cannot be limited to the activity of copywriters and art directors at the creative departments of agencies, but it is understood as a general quality of any advertising communication professional, which is why universities seek to teach this holistic vision integrating the creative approach in the advertising systems and processes and highlighting the applicability of creativity in all and each one of the stages.
Regarding the competencies, we highlight the following generic and specific ones, since they are the most prominent in the teaching guides of the subjects of creativity and conceptualization:

In the 2016-2017 course all the examined subjects were based on participative methodologies that involved students, with a significant importance on practical activities in a continuous evaluation process. However, the master class based on an interactive presentation is still the most common practice when addressing the theoretical contents, which is why we can assert in these cases, that the conversion towards a cooperative learning integral model is at an intermediate phase.

5. Conclusions

If the creation of the EHEA was driven by the necessity of the Academy for a greater connection with professional reality, this searching of synergies with the industry has to be the foundation guiding any teaching methodology, and from our perspective, more bridges that allow and motivate professionals to get closer to students –and vice versa- must be built from universities, since students are keen to interact with professional reality. In this sense, as pointed out by Muela (2012), the advertising creativity subject:

Even though it has to develop a theoretical part about the basic concepts of this activity as a fundamental part of a process aimed to solve problems to obtain original products, it must also eliminate the myths associated to the figure of the copywriter as a genius or enlightened. Therefore, it is a subject focused on the profession, but also an essential requirement in any stage of the strategic process of a campaign that is, especially, associated to a department and a group of professionals who work in creative teams. (p. 34)

As the White Paper of the degrees in communication (ANECA, 2005, p. 337) states, the professor of advertising creativity has to provoke a “proximity to the professional reality and the communicative endeavor, from reflection and study understood as the set of different actions, especially advertising ones” from students.
The communication strategic planner has been holding a key spot within the structure of agencies and it is even more and more common for him/her to be part of the marketing and communication departments of the advertiser (Castelló-Martínez, 2019; Sebastián-Morillas, Martín-Soladana and Clemente-Mediavilla, 2020). As stated by Gem Romero -Head of Strategy in LOLA MullenLowe Barcelona-, “strategic thinking is equally necessary in advertising as it is creativity […] we should all be strategists or copywriters in the different stages of the advertising process” (Álvarez-Ruíz, 2012, p. 13). Strategic planning has been consolidating as a high level of professionalization in Spain; therefore, the syllabi of Communication must provide immediate answers to these new market needs, focusing on the planner figure.
Since the economic recession period that began in 2008, advertisers have reduced their advertising investment -the 5.951,8 million euros invested in advertising in controlled media in 2009 are closer to the 5.110 million euros of 1999 than to the 7.986 million euros of 2007 (InfoAdex, 2020)-, but they invest more intelligently, demanding integrated communicative solutions that assure the measurement of effectiveness and profitability, allow the personalization of the message, incorporate the participation of the audience and its interaction with the message and for the consumer to be the main figure.
The importance that the communication context acquires for those brands that crave reaching the level of useful brands, providing a frank and lasting answer in persuasive communication to the social concerns and tensions of the milieu, highlights the figure of the planner, whose main task is knowing and understanding the customer of the target audience to the point of empathizing with him/her. The strategic planner is responsible that creative executions have a solid foundation thanks to choosing a differentiating crux of communication and to the identification of a creative concept, transforming it into an empathic, stimulating, surprising and memorable message for the target audience.
The crux of communication is the pillar on which any strategy of integrated persuasive communication is based (Zomeño, 2014: 211-212; Castelló-Martínez and Del Pino-Romero, 2019). To conceptualize it creatively, based on the in-depth knowledge of the audience, you can draw on the insights of the customer, putting them at the service of the message of the brand. Based on the documentary research about the brand and the product, the competitors, the market and the target audience, the strategic planner is responsible of these two first phases of the creative process in any advertising strategy. As stated by Hernández and Pinar (2012):

Creativity requires strategic planning to assure the effectiveness of its messages, since it is in the strategic phase where you decide what to say about brands and products, to whom you are going to say it and through what mediums. (p. 379)

This new paradigm of integrated persuasive communication justifies the need for the strategy to be creative and for creativity to be strategic, the importance of the planner figure and the urgency when training professionals in communication with this profile, adapting the syllabi to the always changing reality.

References

  1. Alegre Rodríguez, I. y Roca Correa, D. (2012). La Enseñanza de la Creatividad en los Estudios de Publicidad de las Universidades Españolas. http://bit.ly/alegre-roca-2012
  2. Álvarez-Ruiz, A. (2012). La magia del planner. Cómo la planificación estratégica puede potenciar la creatividad persuasiva. Esic.
  3. ANECA (2005). Libro Blanco. Títulos de Grado en Comunicación. http://bit.ly/libro-blanco-aneca
  4. Castelló-Martínez, A. (2019). Estado de la planificación estratégica y la figura del planner en España. Los insights como concepto creativo. Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación, 10(2), 29-43. http://bit.ly/rmc-castello-planificación
  5. Castelló-Martínez, A. y Del Pino-Romero, C. (2019). De la publicidad a la comunicación persuasiva integrada. Estrategia y empatía. Esic.
  6. Davara, F. J. (1994). Estrategias de comunicación en marketing. Dossat.
  7. De la Torre, S. y Violant, V. (2003). Estrategias creativas en la enseñanza universitaria. Una investigación con metodología de desarrollo. Creatividad y Sociedad, (3), 1-23. http://bit.ly/delatorre-violant-2003
  8. Dineen, Ru, & Collins, E. (2004). Out of the Box: the Promotion of Creativity in Learners. DATA International Research Conference 2004 Creativity and Innovation.
  9. Estanyol i Casals, E. (2012). La enseñanza de la creatividad aplicada en relaciones públicas, en el mercado de los grados adaptados al EEES. Comunicación y riesgo: Congreso Internacional Asociación Española de Investigación de la Comunicación. http://bit.ly/estanyol-2012
  10. Fernández March, A. (2005). Nuevas metodologías docentes. VV. AA. Materiales para talleres de formación del profesorado de la UPM para el EEES. ANECA-UPM.
  11. Freire, P. (1995). Pedagogía del oprimido. Siglo XXI.
  12. García-Uceda, M. (2001). Las claves de la publicidad. Esic.
  13. González, J., & Wagenaar, R. (Eds.) (2003). Tuning Educational Structures in Europe. Informe Final. Proyecto Piloto – Fase 1. Universidad de Deusto. http://bit.ly/gonzalez-wagenaar-2003.
  14. Hernández Martínez, C. y Pinar Selva, M. L. (2012). Las bases estratégicas de la creatividad publicitaria. En Cuesta, U. (Coord.). Planificación estratégica y creatividad (pp. 375-391). Esic.
  15. InfoAdex (2020). Estudio InfoAdex de la Inversión Publicitaria en España 2020. http://bit.ly/infoadex-2020
  16. Kapferer, J.-N. (1997). Strategic Brand Management. Kogan Page.
  17. Kolg, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning. Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
  18. Marín Ibáñez, R. (1989). La formación para la creatividad. Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia.
  19. Marta-Lazo, C. (2012). El aprendizaje basado en competencias en la educación universitaria del siglo XXI. En Marta Lazo, C., Agustín Lacruz, M. C. y Ubieto Artur, M. I. Competencias interdisciplinares para la comunicación y la información en la sociedad digital. Icono14, 13-30.
  20. Marta-Lazo, C. (2009). El proceso de reconversión de la comunicación en el EEES. Icono14. Revista de comunicación y tecnologías emergentes, 7(3), 1-7. http://bit.ly/marta-2009 http://dx.doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v7i3.492 
  21. Muela Molina, C. (2012). Aprendizaje cooperativo de la creatividad publicitaria a través de anuncios audio y/o visuales. @tic. Revista d´innovació educativa, (8), 33-39. http://bit.ly/muela-2012
  22. Pérez Martínez, V. M., Vadillo Bengoa, N. y McMahon, J. (2011). Experiencias colaborativas en la formación de estudiantes de periodismo: Press Writing and Communication I y Documentación Informativa. En Marta Lazo (Coord.). Retos del profesional de la Comunicación en la Sociedad del Conocimiento. Cuadernos Artesanos de Latina, nº 7, (pp. 66-88). Sociedad Latina de Comunicación Social.
  23. Pérez-González, R. A. (1989). Estrategia publicitaria y de las relaciones públicas. Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
  24. Ross, B. & Richards, J. (2008). A Century of Advertising Education. American Academy of Advertising.
  25. Sebastián-Morillas, A., Martín-Soladana, I., y Clemente-Mediavilla, J. (2020). Importancia de los ‘insights’ en el proceso estratégico y creativo de las campañas publicitarias. Estudios Sobre El Mensaje Periodístico,  26(1),  339-348. http://bit.ly/sebastian-esmp-2020 https://doi.org/10.5209/esmp.66570
  26. Sierra-Sánchez, J. y Cabezuelo Lorenzo, F. (2010). Recursos de las facultades de comunicación para la formación en competencias en el marco del Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior. Doxa Comunicación, (11), 31-54. http://bit.ly/sierra-cabezuelo-2010
  27. Sivera-Bello, S. (2016). Genios y botellas: cómo se imparte Pensamiento Creativo en la UOC. Opción: Revista de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales, (12), 701-723. http://bit.ly/sivera-bello-2016
  28. Stuhlfaut, Mark W. y Berman, M. (2009). Pedagogic Challenges: The Teaching of Creative Strategy in Advertising. Journal of Advertising Education, 13(2).
  29. Torres Romay, E. (2010). Enseñanza universitaria de la comunicación estratégica en España. Análisis de la repercusión del proceso de adaptación al Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior en la enseñanza de estrategias. Signo y Pensamiento, 29(56), 304-327. http://bit.ly/torres-2010
  30. Tur-Viñes, V. (2008). La creatividad publicitaria en el Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior. III Simposium de profesores universitarios de creatividad publicitaria, (pp.153-160). http://bit.ly/tur-vines-2008
  31. Zomeño, D. (2014). Se busca director creativo. adComunica. Revista Científica de Estrategias,Tendencias e Innovación en Comunicación, (8), 225-226. http://bit.ly/zomeno-2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.6035/2174-0992.2014.8.17
  32. Aguaded, J. I. (2011). Media education: An international unstoppable phenomenon. The Work of the UN, Europe and Spain in the Field of Educommunication. Comunicar, 19(37), 7-8. http://bit.ly/aguaded-2011 http://dx.doi.org/10.3916/C37-2011-01-01
  33. Ajjan, H. y Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: theory and empirical tests. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 71-80. http://bit.ly/ajjan-hartshorne-2008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.05.002  
  34. Alonso, C. M. (2004). La creatividad publicitaria en la universidad: Reflexiones para la profundización en el ámbito de la docencia. Creatividad y Sociedad, (6), 47-60.
  35. Armendáriz, E. (2015). El nuevo perfil del profesional de la Comunicación y las Relaciones Públicas. Una visión desde la perspectiva del mercado. Revista Internacional de Relaciones Públicas, 5(9), 153-178. http://bit.ly/armendariz-2015  http://dx.doi.org/10.5783/RIRP-9-2015-09-153-178
  36. Arroyo Almaraz, I. (2005). Los valores sociales de la creatividad publicitaria. Icono14. Revista de comunicación y tecnologías emergentes, 3(2), 1-22. http://bit.ly/arroyo-2005 http://dx.doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v3i2.416
  37. Baños González, M. (2005). `Vayamos por partes…´ dijo Jack El Destripador. Icono14. Revista de comunicación y tecnologías emergentes, 3(1), 1-19. http://bit.ly/baños-2005
  38. Benavides Delgado, J. (2012). La investigación en comunicación y publicidad. Questiones Publicitarias, 1(17), 71-93. http://bit.ly/bibliografia-benavides
  39. Camusso, M. Á. (2007). Los mitos de la creatividad en la enseñanza de la creatividad publicitaria: dificultades, paradojas y desafíos. Creatividad y Sociedad, (11), 146-162. http://bit.ly/camusso-2007
  40. Corredor, P. y Farfán, J. (2010). Demandas y formación: Nuevos perfiles profesionales para la Publicidad en España. Pensar la Publicidad, 4(1). 97-116. http://bit.ly/corredor-farfan-2010
  41. Correyero Ruiz, B. y Balandrón Pazos, A. J. (2011). Demandas formativas de los perfiles profesionales emergentes en comunicación en el EEES. En Marta Lazo, C. (Coord.). Retos del profesional de la Comunicación en la Sociedad del Conocimiento. Cuadernos Artesanos de Latina, nº 7, (pp. 47-65). Sociedad Latina de Comunicación Social.
  42. Cortés Montalvo, J. A. (2012). La competencia comunicativa en la formación universitaria. En Marta Lazo, C., Agustín Lacruz, M. C. y Ubieto Artur, M. I. Competencias interdisciplinares para la comunicación y la información en la sociedad digital. Icono14, 47-72.
  43. Earle, L. (2005). Creative Message Strategy as a Framework for Course Planning, Preparation, and Pedagogy Or: Everything I Know About Teaching I Learned from Advertising. Journal of Advertising Education, 9(2).
  44. Fernández Cavia, J. y Sánchez Blanco, C. (2012). Retos de la profesión publicitaria: aportaciones desde la planificación estratégica. Zer. Revista De Estudios De Comunicación, 17(32), 51-71. http://bit.ly/fernandez-sanchez-2012
  45. García García, F. (2006). De la convergencia tecnológica a la convergencia comunicativa en la educación y el progreso. Icono14. Revista de comunicación y tecnologías emergentes, 4(1), 1-19. http://bit.ly/garcia-2006 http://dx.doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v4i1.394
  46. Hellín Ortuño, P. A. (2007). Adaptación al EEES en la Licenciatura de Publicidad y Relaciones Públicas. Una experiencia de innovación docente. Estudos em Comunicaçao, (1), 362-376. http://bit.ly/hellin-2007
  47. Lau, K. & Ng, Frankie & Lee, P. (2009). Rethinking the creativity training in design education: a study of creative thinking tools for facilitating creativity development of design students.
  48. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 8(1), 71-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1386/adch.8.1.71_1
  49. Martín, E. (2014). Tecnocreatividad. adComunica. Revista Científica de Estrategias, Tendencias e Innovación en Comunicación, (8), 213-214. http://bit.ly/martin-eugenio-2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.6035/2174-0992.2014.8.13
  50. Ortiz Sobrino, M. Á. (2009). La reconversación de la formación en comunicación desde el Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior. Icono14. Revista de comunicación y tecnologías emergentes, 7(3), 35-49. http://bit.ly/ortiz-2009 https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v7i3.301
  51. Rodrigo Martín, L., García García, F. y Rodrigo Martín, I. (2014). Creatividad y nuevas tecnologías: Las claves de la cultura emprendedora. El papel de la universidad en la formación de
  52. Intelectuales con espíritu emprendedor. adComunica. Revista Científica de Estrategias, Tendencias e Innovación en Comunicación, (8), 23-37. http://bit.ly/rodrigo-garcia-rodrigo-2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.6035/2174-0992.2014.8.3
  53. Ubieto Artur, M. I., Agustín Lacruz, M. C. y Marta Lazo, C. (2011). El valor de los perfiles de ingreso en la formación de los futuros profesionales de la Información y la Comunicación. En Marta Lazo (Coord.). Retos del profesional de la Comunicación en la Sociedad del Conocimiento. Cuadernos Artesanos de Latina, nº 7, (pp. 89-113). Sociedad Latina de Comunicación Social.

Authors

Araceli Castelló-Martínez
Doctor in Communication from CEU Cardenal Herrera University, Master in Integral Communication from Complutense University of Madrid, Executive Master in Community Management from University of Alicante and has a degree in Advertising and Public Relations from University of Alicante, with Extraordinary Prize of Degree and Second national award for excellence in academic performance. University Titular Professor at University of Alicante for six years (2009-2014), she teaches Advertising and Public Relations. She has also been a professor in the Degree in Advertising and Public Relations at CEU Cardenal Herrera University and has collaborated as a professor in several postgraduate courses. She has worked in media agencies (Netthink, Carat, Initiative) and digital platforms (Ya.com, Vocento) in Spain and Belgium and has made numerous publications about online advertising planning, social media marketing and digital communication, with books like: Estrategias empresariales en la Web 2.0. Las redes sociales online and La comunicación en cambio constante or the report Tendencias en planificación publicitaria online published by AIMC. By February 2018 she has 535 quotes and cites, with a 12 H-index and a 17 i10-index.
araceli.castello@ua.es
ORCID: http://bit.ly/orcid-araceli-castello
Google Scholar: http://bit.ly/scholar-araceli-castello
Personal webpage: http://www.aracelicastello.com