Análisis de citación, co-citación y co-palabras de los medios de comunicación pública y ecosistema digital

Luis Antonio López-Fraile; Eva Jiménez-García; Miguel Ángel Alonso Guisande

doi:10.4185/rlcs-2024-1979

Authors

Luis Antonio López-Fraile Universidad Europea de Madrid https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4997-1815
Eva Jiménez-García Universidad Europea de Madrid https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6541-3517
Miguel Ángel Alonso Guisande Universidad Europea de Madrid https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2758-6024

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4185/rlcs-2024-1979

Keywords:

public media, public service media, digital ecosystem, bibliometric analysis, citation analysis, co-citation analysis, co-word analysis

Abstract

Introduction: This paper examines the scientific production related to the public media in digital world, due to the increase in the last decade. Methodology: 292 indexed references in Web of Science between 2012-2022 are selected, carrying out a bibliometric analysis of citation, co-citation and co-words of scientific research on the subject. Results: The aforementioned analysis determines that the countries with the highest number of citations on the subject are Belgium, the United States, England and Austria; the source with the highest number of citations is Journalism Studies; the most cited documents are those of Van Dijck and Poell, (2015) and Aalberg et al. (2013); concerning authors, the most cited are Shanto Iyengar and Hilde Van den Bulck. Concerning the analysis of co-citations, the most mentioned papers are Bardoel, (2003), Hallin y Mancini (2004) and Brevini, B. (2013), and the most cited authors are Hallin, D. C., Van den Bulck, H. and Benson, R. In both cases, the thematic groupings are: public television services, media and politics and influence of the media on public opinion. Regarding the co-citation of sources, Media, Culture & Society; Journal of Communication and Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, among others. The analysis of co-words shows the main research subjects: news communication, mass communication, European journalism and global journalism. Discussion and conclusions: This paper makes it possible the identification of the main trends and theoretical fundamentals in the studied field, as well as to detect emerging trends.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Luis Antonio López-Fraile, Universidad Europea de Madrid

PhD in Communication cum laude from the European University of Madrid, Bachelor's degree in Political Science and Sociology from UCM (specializations in Labor Sociology and Consumer Behavior), and Master's degree in Human Resources Management and Organization from ESIC. Responsible for Academic Internships and Employability and a professor since 2001 at the Faculty of Social Sciences and Communication of the European University of Madrid. Has undertaken several international stays at the Università degli Studi di Bergamo (Italy). Has held positions of responsibility at the European University of Madrid, including Director of the Career Guidance Office and Vice Dean of Business Communication at the Faculty of Communication. Areas of research include employability, communication, and the use of ICT in education.

Eva Jiménez-García, Universidad Europea de Madrid

Doctorate in Education Sciences from the Complutense University of Madrid (2017) with an outstanding cum laude distinction and the Extraordinary Doctorate Award. Accredited as a Contracted Doctoral Professor. Academic Director at the European University and Director of the Chair of Talent Measurement and Evaluation. Member of the Research Group on Measurement and Evaluation of Educational Systems at the Complutense University of Madrid and the Research Group on Educational Innovation at the European University of Madrid. Member of the Evaluation Council of the Complutense Journal of Education and the Journal of Education. Member of the Advisory Council of the Pedagogical Trends Journal. Research activity focused on evaluation, analysis, and educational measurement.

Miguel Ángel Alonso Guisande, Universidad Europea de Madrid

PhD in Communication cum laude from the European University of Madrid. Telecommunications Engineer specialized in image and sound. Graduated in Audiovisual Communication and Master's degree in Acoustic, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering. Author of communications and presentations at international conferences, as well as articles in specialized journals. Has developed a professional career in various national and international broadcast companies as well as in the production sector. Has undertaken an international stay at Santa Fe University of Arts and Design in New Mexico, USA. Research work focuses on the field of audiovisual technology, film production, and sound, with special emphasis on the study of acoustics applied to audiovisual systems and broadcast environments.

References

Aalberg, T. (2010). Mektige meningsmålinger? Journalisters og politikeres oppfatning av meningsmålingers troverdighet og innflytelse. Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning, 51(3), 445-459. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1504-291X-2010-03-05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1504-291X-2010-03-05

Aalberg, T., y Curran, J. (2013). The changing role of public service media in the digital age. In Political communication in the 21st century (pp. 91-106). Palgrave Macmillan.

Aalberg, T., Papathanassopoulos, S., Soroka, S., Curran, J., Hayashi, K., Iyengar, S., ... y Tiffen, R. (2013). International TV news, foreign affairs interest and public knowledge: A comparative study of foreign news coverage and public opinion in 11 countries. Journalism Studies, 14(3), 387-406. https://doi.org/doi:10.1080/1461670X.2013.765636 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2013.765636

Arencibia-Jorge, R., Vega-Almeida, R. L. y Carrillo-Calvet, H. (2020). Evolución y alcance multidisciplinar de tres técnicas de análisis bibliométrico, Palabra Clave 10(1). https://doi.org/10.24215/18539912e102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24215/18539912e102

Bardoel, J. (2003). Back to the public? Assessing public broadcasting in the Netherlands. Javnost-The Public, 10(3), 81-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2003.11008836 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2003.11008836

Bardoel, J., y d'Haenens, L. (2008). Reinventing public service broadcasting in Europe: prospects, promises and problems. Media, culture & society, 30(3), 337-355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443708088791 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443708088791

Brevini, B. (2013). From public service to public media: the changing role of public service broadcasting in Europe. In The future of public service communication (pp. 15-34). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137295101

Castillo, A., Rubio, A., y Almansa, A. (2012). La investigación en Comunicación. Análisis bibliométrico de las revistas de mayor impacto del ISI. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 67, 248–270. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-067-955-248-270 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-067-955-248-270

Casado, M. Á., Guimerà, J. À., Bonet, M., y Llavador, J. P. (2022). Adapt or die? How traditional Spanish TV broadcasters deal with the youth target in the new audio-visual ecosystem. Critical Studies in Television, https://doi.org/10.1177/17496020221076983 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17496020221076983

Curran, J., Iyengar, S., Brink Lund, A., y Salovaara-Moring, I. (2009). Media system, public knowledge and democracy: A comparative study. European journal of communication, 24(1), 5-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323108098 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323108098943

de Dios, S. C., Romero-Rodríguez, L. M., y Aguaded, I. (2020). El lenguaje como creador de realidades y opinión pública: análisis crítico a la luz del actual ecosistema mediático. Íconos. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, (67), 139-157.https://doi.org/10.17141/iconos.67.2020.3942 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17141/iconos.67.2020.3942

del Rosario González, L. (2019). Democracia, esfera pública y medios de comunicación. Vivat Academia. Revista de Comunicación, 140, 25-44. https://doi.org/10.15178/va.2019.149.25-44 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15178/va.2019.149.25-44

Demir, Z. G., Sümer, F. E., y Karakaya, Ç. (2020). A Bibliometric Analysis of Public Relations Models. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, (58), 105-132. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2020-0015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2020-0015

Donders, K. (2019). Public service media beyond the digital hype: distribution strategies in a platform era. Media, Culture & Society, 41(7), 1011-1028. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344371985761 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719857616

Enli, G. S. (2008). Redefining public service broadcasting: Multi-platform participation. Convergence, 14(1), 105-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856507084422 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856507084422

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. McQuail's reader in mass communication theory, 390, 397. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of ‘platforms’. New media & society, 12(3), 347-364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342738 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342738

Gutiérrez-González C. y González Pardo R. (2021). Análisis de las publicaciones en “televisión pública”. Historia y Comunicación Social, 26(1), 291-305. https://doi.org/10.5209/hics.66254 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/hics.66254

Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere, trans. Thomas Burger. Cambridge: MIT Press, 85(85-92), 180.

Hallin, D. C., y Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge university press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790867 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790867

Jenkins, H., y Deuze, M. (2008). Convergence culture. Convergence, 14(1), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856507084415 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856507084415

Krippendorff, K. (2004). Measuring the reliability of qualitative text analysis data. Quality and quantity, 38, 787-800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-004-8107-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-004-8107-7

McChesney, R. W., y Nichols, J. (2011). The death and life of American journalism: The media revolution that will begin the world again. Bold Type Books.

McCombs, M. E., y Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public opinion quarterly, 36(2), 176-187. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/267990

McCombs, M. (2004). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Cambridge: Polity.

Morales-Vargas, A., Pedraza-Jiménez, R., & Codina, L. (2022). Calidad web en medios digitales: revisión bibliográfica sobre métodos e indicadores de evaluación general y atributos de confianza. Revista Latina De Comunicación Social, (80), 39–63. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2022-1515 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2022-1515

Morehouse, J. y Saffer, A. J. (2018). A bibliometric analysis of dialogue and digital dialogic research: mapping the knowledge construction and invisible colleges in public relations research. Journal of Public Relations Research, 30 (3), 65-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2018.1498343 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2018.1498343

Orduña-Malea, Enrique, and Rodrigo Costas. "Link-based approach to study scientific software usage: The case of VOSviewer." Scientometrics 126.9 (2021): 8153-8186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04082-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04082-y

Pari Tito, F., García-Peñalvo, F. J., y Pérez Postigo, G. (2022). Análisis bibliométrico de la desinformación mediática y fake news en las redes sociales. Revista Universidad y Sociedad, 14(S2), 37-45.

Prasetya, H. A., y Murata, T. (2020). A model of opinion and propagation structure polarization in social media. Computational Social Networks, 7(1), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40649-019-0076-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40649-019-0076-z

Quevedo-Redondo, R., Antona-Jimeno, T., y Vicent-Ibáñez, M. (2022). Research on News Sharing. A Proposal of bibliometric analysis. Communication & Society, 285-298. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.35.2.285-298 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15581/003.35.2.285-298

Rejeb, A., Rejeb, K., Abdollahi, A., y Treiblmaier, H. (2022). The big picture on Instagram research: Insights from a bibliometric analysis. Telematics and Informatics, 73, 101876. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101876 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101876

Rogel-Salazar, R., Santiago-Bautista, I., y Martínez-Domínguez, N. (2017). Latin American scientific journals of Communication indexed in WoS, Scopus and Open Access databases. Comunicación y sociedad, (30), 167-196 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32870/cys.v0i30.6514

Shu, S., y Liu, Y. (2021). Looking Back to Move Forward: A Bibliometric Analysis of Consumer Privacy Research. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(4), 727-747. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16040042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16040042

Van Eck, N., y Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

Van Dijck, J., y Poell, T. (2015). Making public television social? Public service broadcasting and the challenges of social media. Television & new media, 16(2), 148-164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476414527136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476414527136

Velt, H., Torkkeli, L., y Laine, I. (2020). Entrepreneurial ecosystem research: Bibliometric mapping of the domain. Journal of Business Ecosystems (JBE), 1(2), 43-83.. https://doi.org/10.4018/JBE.20200701.oa1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/JBE.20200701.oa1

Yarchi, M., Baden, C., y Kligler-Vilenchik, N. (2021). Political polarization on the digital sphere: A cross-platform, over-time analysis of interactional, positional, and affective polarization on social media. Political Communication, 38(1-2), 98-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1785067 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1785067

Zupic, I., y Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational research methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442811456262 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629