Artivism plus Grassroots. Study of the case: The Municipal Campaign of Manuela Carmena
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2019-1378Keywords:
Artivism, Grassroots, political communication, citizen participation, artAbstract
The object of the present study is the case study: "Artivism plus Grassroots”, performed in the election campaign of Manuela Carmena during Municipal Elections of Madrid in 2015, where these two terms merged, art and citizen participation, innovating in political communication as has never been seen before in Spain. Also, in this context, there will be delving into the campaign of the political party Ahora Madrid, to which the aforementioned candidate is affiliated. It is revealing to account for the use of digital platforms as communication tools by the new parties, in this case Ahora Madrid, during the elections, to identify the activity generated therein and its character and, likewise, to observe whether they promoted the horizontal and bidirectional communication characteristic of this environment 2.0. For Manuel Castells (2012) in the past two decades there was a revolutionary transformation in terms of technology and organization of the socialized communication. “Said transformation can be defined as the shift from masses communication to self-communication of masses” (p.23). A relevant issue to be developed in this article. And in all this environment of changes in communication it is noteworthy that in the political behaviour of Spanish there is a before and an after since the 15M movement. The professor Antonio GutiérrezRubí (2011) is worth mentioning, who considers the resurgence of a new public space is observed as a consequence of the use of social networks and Internet for the civic action. This entails “the loss of the exclusive privilege of the political action by politicians” and he adds “they must have seen that it is possible to organize politically without them; to communicate in an efficacious manner without mediatic intermediation or against some myopias; and to create
Downloads
References
Álvarez-Gayou, J. L. (2013) Como hacer investigación cualitativa. Fundamentos y metodología. México: Paidós Ibérica.
Baptista, P., Fernández, C. y Hernández, R. (2010). Metodología de la investigación. México: McGrawHill.
Barbosa de Oliveira, L. M. (2007). Corpos indisciplinados. Ação cultural em tem pos de biopolítica. São Paulo: Beca.
Caldevilla, D. (2010). Democracia 2.0: La política se introduce en las redes sociales. Pensar La Publicidad. Revista Internacional de Investigaciones Publicitarias, 3(2), 31-48. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/PEPU/article/view/PEPU0909220031A
Castells, M. (2012) Networks of Outrage and Hope. Social Movements in the Internet Age. Cambridge: Polity Pres.
Cotarelo, R. y Crespo, I. (2013), La comunicación política y las nuevas tecnologías. Madrid: Editorial Catarata.
Cotarelo, R. (2010). La política en la era de Internet. Valencia: Tirant Lo Blanch.
Dader, J. L., Cheng, L., Campos, E., Quintana, N. & Vizcaíno-Laorga, R. (2014). Las webs de los partidos españoles en campaña electoral. Continuismo entre 2008 y 2011. Trípodos, 1(34), 115-152.
López Trigo, M. (2013), “El uso de internet en las elecciones generales en España de 2011: análisis de las estrategias de marketing electoral en los medios digitales del PP y PSOE” (Tesis Doctoral, Univesidad Ceu Cardenal Herrera)
Lucas Marín, A. (1982). Conceptos básicos de la sociología. Pamplona: Ed. Elinsa Rodríguez, J. M. (2011). Métodos de investigación cualitativa. Revista de Investigación Silogismo, 1(08).
Rey Morato, J. (2008), Comunicación política, Internet y Campañas electorales. De la teledemocracia a la ciberdemocracia. Madrid: Tecnos.
Sampedro, V. F. (2009). Cibercampañas. Cauces y diques para la participación. Las elecciones Generales de 2008 y su proyección tecnopolítica”. Madrid: Complutense editorial.
Ureña, D. (2011). Decálogo para un candidato 2.0. Cuadernos de Comunicación Evoca, 4(29-33).