Cultural and communication industries: Myth and logic of the terms creativity and entrepreneurial innovation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2015-1073

Keywords:

Myth and logic of innovation, entrepreneurs, areas of innovation, economic, political and social environments, cultural and media industries

Abstract

Politicians, economists, diverse institutions, including the university, advertisers, and the media repeat in their discourses, over and over again, the mantra of entrepreneurship and innovation as sacred formulas that can put an end to the economic, political and social crises in which the globalised world is immersed. This article aims to clarify the myth and logic of these concepts, based on the case study of the cultural and media industries. Methods: The study is based on the Socratic method. Bibliographic and hemerographic analyses were carried out to answer the following questions: What are the different meanings associated to the terms creativity and innovation? Which of the different meanings that are associated to the terms creativity and innovation do public and private authorities refer to in these times of crisis? Why? Which are the valid meanings? How can the case study method be applied to the cultural and media industries in this regard? Results: The case studies show that the true meaning of the terms creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurs have little to do with the meanings mostly invoked by the public and private powers. Conclusions: the critical analysis puts into question the different theoretical contributions that identify extraordinary mental processes as the basis for acts of creation and innovation. Anyone who knows the workings of the cultural and media industries and their political, economic and social environments can come up with a creative solution to a problem if this solution involves a previously unknown method. In other words, this is the logic of the entrepreneur who creates and innovates in any of the seven areas of opportunity identified by Drucker: the unexpected; the incongruity; the innovation based on process need; changes in industry and market structure; demographics; changes in perception, mood and meaning; and new knowledge, both scientific and non-scientific. The article explains these areas of opportunity based on the case studies of the cultural and media industries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Rosario de Mateo Pérez, Autonomous University of Barcelona

Lecturer since 1994 and Professor since 1978 at the Autonomous University of Barcelona. Economist and Doctor in Communication Sciences. Working mostly the areas of economy of communication.

Professor of media management, economy of communication and business communication. Member of the international EuroMedia Research Group, which is dedicated to the comparative study of media systems and communication policies in Europe.

References

Berners-Lee, T. (2009): 15 de noviembre, World Wide Web Foundation. Recuperada 19 de febrero de 2011 from wwwFoundation. https://webfoundation.org/about/vision/history-of-the-web/

Canavilhas (2010): O novo ecosistema mediático, Comunicación presentada en le II Congreso Internacional sobre Periodismo y Web 2.0, Bilbao.

Cobo Romaní, C. y Pardo Kukklinski, H. (2007): Planeta web 2.0. Inteligencia colectiva o medios Fast Food. Web oficial planetaweb2,net.

DeBono, E. (1968): New think, New York, Basic Books.

De Mateo, R. (2006): “Dinámicas empresariales y mercados de la comunicación social”. En: López, X. y Aneiros, R. Comunicación e Cultura en Galicia e Portugal, Santiago de Compostela, Concello da Cultura Galega. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17075/ccgp.2007.001

De Mateo, R., Bergés, L. y Sabater, M. (2009): Gestión de empresas de comunicación, Sevilla-Zamora, Comunicación Social, ediciones y publicaciones.

De Mateo, R., Becerra, M. y Bergés, L. (2009): “La información en el mercado global de la comunicación”. En: Carvajal Rivera, J. y Rodríguez, G. (editores), Comunicación informativa y nuevas tecnologías, Buenos Aires, Gran Aldea editores.

Drucker, P. F. (1994): La innovación y el empresario innovador, Barcelona, Edhasa.

Gardner, M. (1985): ¡Ajá!, 3ª edición, Barcelona, Labor.

Gergen, K. J. (2006): El yo saturado. Barcelona, Paidós, Col. Surcos.

Guilford, J. P. (1959): “Traits of Creativity” en H.H. Anderson (ed.), Creativity and its cultivation, New York, Harper.

Koestler, A. (1964): The act of creation. New York, Mcmillan.

Mitchell, A. y Rosenstiel, T. (2012): Overwiew, Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism.

Morcillo, P. (2008), “Estilos de dirección frente a la decisión de innovar”, Economistas, 118(26), Madrid, Colegio de Economistas de Madrid.

Osborne, A. (1953): Applied imagination. Revised edition. New York, Charles Scribner’s Sons.

Poincaré, H. (1913): “Mathematical creation”. En: The foundation of Science, New York, The Science Press.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1944): Teoría del desenvolvimiento económico. Una investigación sobre ganancias, capital, crédito, interés y ciclo económico, México, Fondo de Cultura Económica. Traducción de la obra original Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung (1912).

Torres, A. (2015): “Windows 10. “Los entretelones de una actualización crítica para Microsoft”, La Nación, 29 de julio de 2015, Sociedad, pp. 17. Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Wallas, G. (1926): The art of thought, New York, Harcourt Brace.

Weisberg, R. W. (1989): Creatividad. El genio y otros mitos, Barcelona, Labor

Published

2015-12-09

How to Cite

de Mateo Pérez, R. (2015). Cultural and communication industries: Myth and logic of the terms creativity and entrepreneurial innovation. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, (70), 813–832. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2015-1073

Issue

Section

Miscellaneous

Most read articles by the same author(s)