The negative election advertising
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-66-2011-939-399-425Keywords:
political party, electoral spot, negative advertising strategy, campaign, political opponentAbstract
Political advertisement has an unequivocal aim during the election campaign: the favorable vote achievement. This message is communicated to the electorate by television and Internet, and it usually presents a negative approach, which includes a direct critical message against the opponent, rather than an exposition of its own proposals. This article is focused on the analysis of the negative election advertisement in audiovisual productions, which is built without further cause than the opponent’s disapproval. It consists of some videos, based on the dissemination of the potential of the organization and the virtues of their candidate– and their election manifesto as well– wasting their time discrediting through the transmission of their messages, many times, ad hominem. We are going through the development of the negative election advertisement since its first appearance, which in Spain dates back to 1996, which coincides with the broadcasting of the famous Doberman’s video, apart from other examples that complete the study referred.
Downloads
References
Aristóteles (1971): Retórica. Trad. de Antonio Tovar. Madrid: Instituto de Estudios Políticos.
Canel Crespo, M. J. (2006): Comunicación política: una guía para su estudio. Madrid: Tecnos.
D´Adamo, O. J. y García Beaudoux, V. (2005): Comunicación política y campañas electorales: estrategias en elecciones presidenciales. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Dader, J. L. (1999): Retórica mediática frente a cultura política autóctona: La encrucijada de la comunicación política electoral española entre la americanización y el pluralismo democrático tradicional. Madrid: CIC, 4, 63-87, Servicio de Publicaciones de la UCM.
Düring, I. (2005): Aristóteles. Exposición e interpretación de su pensamiento. Trad. de Bernabé Navarro. México D.F. UNAM: Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas.
Finkel, S. E. & Geer, J. G. (1998): Spot check. Casting doubt on the demobilization Hypothesis: American Journal of Political Science, 42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2991771
Hovland, C. I. & Weiss, W. (1951): "The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness". En Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/266350
Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L. & Kelley, H. H. (1953): Communication and Persuasion: Psychological Studies of Opinion Change. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Kaid, L. L. (2004): Handbook of Political Comunication Research. New Jersey: Ed. Lynda Lee Kaid. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410610584
Maquiavelo, N. (1854): El Príncipe. Madrid: Imprenta de Trujillo, J.
Maquiavelo, N. (2005): El Príncipe, trad. Alarcón, M. Longseller: Colección Pensamiento político.
Martín Salgado, L. (2004): Marketing político: arte y ciencia de la persuasión en democracia. Madrid, 37, Papeles de comunicación: Paidós.
Mazzoleni, G. (2010): La comunicación política. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Rudelli, R. (2010): Vídeopol. Milano: Edizioni L´Ornitorinco.
Sartori, G. (2008): Homo videns. La sociedad teledirigida. Madrid: Taurus.
Soengas, X. (2009): "Los límites de la información en los debates pactados". En Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 64, (pp 988-999). La Laguna (Tenerife): Universidad de La Laguna, recuperado el 5 de julio de 2010, de http://www.revistalatinacs.org/09/art/875_Santiago/76_132_Soengas.html DOI: https://doi.org/10.4185/10.4185/RLCS-64-2009-875-988-999
Van Dijk, T. (1978): La ciencia del texto. Barcelona: Paidós Comunicación.