The concept of Media Reform and its contributions to the processes of ecosocial and communicative justice

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4185/rlcs-2024-2299

Keywords:

Media reform, Third Sector of Communication, Community media, Educommunication, Social movements, NGO, Social responsibility.

Abstract

In the current context of planetary crisis and inequality, communication and its media are strategic spaces from which to work for more just, representative and socially and ecologically responsible societies. This state of the question explores the theoretical debates and main contributions to eco-social and communicative justice of the media reform movements in different parts of the planet since the publication of historical milestones such as the Hutchins Report (1947) and the McBride Report (1980).  NOTE: This monograph is part of the R&D "Sustainability of the Third Communication Sector. Design and Application of Indicators" (SOSCom) [PID2020-113011RB-I00 funded by MCIN/ AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033] and the lines of action of the Research Network on Community, Alternative and Participatory Communication (RICCAP).    

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Alejandro Barranquero, Carlos III University of Madrid

Associate Professor at the Communication and Media Studies Department at Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (UC3M). Doctor in Journalism and Bachelor of Journalism and Audiovisual Communication at the University of Malaga, he completed his studies at the Complutense University of Madrid, where he specializes in Historical Materialism and Critical Theory, Communication and Political Management, and Communication and Arts. He is the author and co-author of different writings about: communication for development and social change, community and citizen media, educommunication, environmental communication and human-rights journalism. He is director of the Thematic Group “Communication and Citizenship” of the Spanish Association for Communication Research (AE-IC); founder and director of RICCAP and of the Communication, Politics and Citizenship (CPyP) research group at UC3M; and member of the MDCS research group at UCM.

José Candón-Mena, University of Seville

Associate Professor at the Department of Audiovisual Communication and Advertising at the University of Sevilla. Doctor in Communication Sciences and Sociology and Extraordinary Doctorate Award from Universidad Complutense de Madrid; Bachelor of Advertising and Public Relations from the University of Malaga, Master in Communication of Public and Political Institutions from the UCM, and Master in Teaching and Research for Higher Education by the UNED. Researcher of the Interdisciplinary Group of Studies in Communication, Politics and Social Change (COMPOLÍTICAS). Founding member of RICCAP and the Ibero-American Research Network on Urban Policies, Conflicts and Movements. His research lines comprise: community and citizen media; social advertising; communication, NGOs and social movements; technopolitics, digital and deliberative democracy; and social appropriation of ICTs.

Dorothy Kidd , University of San Francisco

PhD in communication from the School of Communications at Simon Fraser University in Vancouver, specializing in international development. Her research agenda is broadly related to the role of grassroots communication and social movements in the promotion of social and environmental justice. She has worked as a popular communicator, trainer, consultant and advocate in community radio, documentary film and video, and solidarity communication projects. Her research has been circulated in academic and non-academic publications, including Popular Communication, Information, Communication & Society, Mediaciones, the Journal of Alternative and Community Media, Project Censored and Peace Review. She teaches media studies at the University of San Francisco in California.

References

Álvarez-Peralta, M. (2017). Demandas de reforma mediática y momento populista. La circulación de las propuestas de democratización de los medios en el espacio político post-bipartidista. IC. Revista Científica de Información y Comunicación, 14, 121-157. https://doi.org/10.12795/IC.2017.i01.05

Arévalo-Salinas, A. I. (2014). Periodismo y comunicación para la paz. Indicadores y marco regulatorio. Commons. Revista de Comunicación y Ciudadanía Digital, 3(1), 56-92. https://doi.org/10.25267/commons.2014.v3.i1.03

Barranquero, A. (2019). Comunicación, ciudadanía y cambio social. Diseño de un modelo de investigación y acción para democratizar la comunicación desde la noción de reforma mediática. Signo y Pensamiento, 38(75). https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.syp38-75.cccs

Cabrera Altieri, Daniel H. (2022). El imaginario textil: una interpretación alternativa en los estudios de la comunicación. History of Media Studies, 2. https://doi.org/10.32376/d895a0ea.a490cc14

Candón-Mena, J., & Calvo, D. (2021). El legado de la cultura hacker en los movimientos y medios ciudadanos españoles. En A. Barranquero y C. Sáez (Eds.), La comunicación desde abajo. Historia, sentidos y prácticas de la comunicación alternativa en España. Barcelona: Gedisa.

Carey, J.W. (1989). “A Cultural Approach to Communication”, en Communication as Culture: Essays on Media and Society (pp. 13-36). Boston: Unwin Hyman.

Hutchins, R. (1947). Informe sobre la libertad de prensa. Universidad de Chicago.

Freedman, D., Obar, J. A., Martens, C., y McChesney, R. W. (Eds.). (2016). Strategies for Media Reform: International Perspectives. Fordham University Press.

Freedman, D. (2022). Reverse Media Policy. Challenging empires, resisting power. En J. Pedro-Carañana, E. Herrera-Huérfano, E., y J. Ochoa (Eds.). (2022). Communicative Justice in the Pluriverse: An International Dialogue. Taylor & Francis.

Hackett, R.A. y Carroll, W.K. (2006). Remaking Media: The Public Struggle to Democratize Public Communication. Routledge.

Horwitz, R.B. (1997) Broadcast reform revisited: Reverend Everett C. Parker and the “standing” case (office of communication of the United church of Christ v. Federal Communications Commission). The Communication Review, 2(3), 311-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714429709368562

Kaplun, G. (2007). Comunicación Comunitaria en América Latina. Buenos Aires: Anuario de Medios.

Mast, J., Coesemans, R., & Temmerman, M. (2019). Constructive journalism: Concepts, practices, and discourses. Journalism, 20(4), 492-503. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918770885

McBride, S. (1980). Un sólo mundo, voces múltiples. UNESCO.

Miralles, A.M. (2002). Periodismo, opinión pública y agenda ciudadana. Bogotá: Norma.

Milan, S. (2013). Social Movements and Their Technologies: Wiring social change. Hampshire, NY: Palgrave.

Nordenstreng, K., y Traber, M. (1992). Few Voices, Many Worlds: Towards a Media Reform Movement. London: WACC.

Ong, W. (2011). Oralidad y escritura. Tecnologías de la palabra. Trad. de Angélica Scherp. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Pedro-Carañana, J., y Garcés, L. A. (2023). Mind management 2.0: The internet and the myth of individualism and personal choice in neoliberal times. Teknokultura: Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales, 20(1), 109-116.

Pedro-Carañana, J., Herrera-Huérfano, E., y Ochoa, J. (Eds.). (2022). Communicative Justice in the Pluriverse: An International Dialogue. Taylor & Francis.

Stein, L, Kidd, D. y Rodriguez, C. (eds.) (2009) Making Our Media: Global Initiatives Toward a Democratic Public Sphere. Volume Two: National and Global Movements for Democratic Communication. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Tucho, F. (2011). La sociedad civil ante el sistema mediático. El movimiento de reforma de los medios en Estados Unidos. ZER: Revista De Estudios De Comunicación, 11(20). https://doi.org/10.1387/zer.3768

Published

2024-01-02

How to Cite

Barranquero, Alejandro, José Candón-Mena, and Dorothy Kidd. 2024. “The concept of Media Reform and its contributions to the processes of ecosocial and communicative justice”. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, no. 82 (January). https://doi.org/10.4185/rlcs-2024-2299.

Issue

Section

Communication, social justice and media reform