The Social Theory of Communication: its viability to study the relationship between the political and the public communication systems in the USA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2014-1001Keywords:
political system, interdependence, social theory of communication, system of public communicationAbstract
Based on a theoretical discussion this article seeks to validate the viability of the Social theory of communication to understand the interdependence between the political and public communication systems in the United States of America. Method. The study is based on theoretical research methods, bibliographic research and the content analysis of a sample of 215 academic journals, governmental documents and research reports. Results. The models that explain the relationship between the political system and the media were critically analysed and the Social theory of communication was applied to examine the interrelation between the political and public communication systems of the USA. Discussion. Although the Social Theory of Communication is valid to analyse that interdependence, we anticipate the need for a more in-depth scientific evaluation of this category. Conclusions. The most important aspect of this theory is that it gives an active role to the media and treats other components such as parties, power groups, political-legal norms, cultural values and ideological processes that have a regulatory function in society as part of the political system.
Downloads
References
Alonso, M. M. and Saladrigas, H. (2000): Para investigar en Comunicación Social. Guía didáctica, La Habana, Editorial Pablo de la Torriente, Unión de Periodistas de Cuba.
Angwin, J. (1996): “Burying Those Who Bury Us”, Sunday Interview, Jessica Mitford, San Francisco Chronicle, Sunday, 30 June, http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/1996/06/30/SC63606.DTL, (Retrieved on 8/09/2011).
Corner, J. (2003): “The Model in Question: A Response to Klaehn on Herman and Chomsky”, European Journal of Communication, London, Thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi, SAGE Publications, 18(3), pp. 367–375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231030183004
Duharte Díaz, E. (2006): “Los sistemas políticos: algunas reflexiones conceptuales” in Duharte Díaz, I. (Comp.): Teoría y Procesos Políticos Contemporáneos, Tomo I, La Habana, Editorial Félix Varela.
Feldstein, M. (2006): “A Muckraking Model Investigative Reporting Cycles in American History”, The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 11(2), pp. 105-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X06286780
Fuentes Navarro, R. (2011): “La producción social de la comunicación en perspectiva socio-histórica”, Chasqui, Revista Latinoamericana de Comunicación, 114-115, pp. 107-108.
García Luis, J. (2004): “La regulación de la prensa en Cuba: referentes morales y deontológicos”, Tesis presentada en Opción al Grado de Doctor en Ciencias de la Comunicación, Universidad de La Habana, Cuba.
González Martín, O. R. (2013): “La relación entre la gran prensa y el sistema político estadounidense en la primera década del siglo XXI según fuentes científicas y gubernamentales”, thesis presented to obtain a Doctoral degree in Communication Sciences, Universidad de La Habana, Cuba.
Hachten, W. A. and Hachten, H. (1999): The World News Prism: changing media of international communication, Iowa State University Press.
Herman, E. S. and Chomsky, N. (1988): Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media, Pantheon Books.
Herring, E. and Robinson, P. (2003): “Too polemical or too critical? Chomsky on the study of the news media and US foreign policy”, Review of International Studies, British International Studies Association, 29, pp. 553–568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210503005539
Klaehn, J. (2002): “A Critical Review and Assessment of Herman and Chomsky’s ‘Propaganda Model’”, European Journal of Communication, London, Thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi, SAGE Publications, 17(2), pp. 147-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323102017002691
Martín Serrano, M. (2005): “Concepto Sistema” in Teoría de la Comunicación. Epistemología y análisis de la referencia (several authors), La Habana, Editorial Pablo de la Torriente, pp. 75-88.
Martín Serrano, M. (1993): La producción social de comunicación, Madrid, Alianza Editorial.
Muñoz Razo, C. (1998): Cómo elaborar y asesorar una investigación de tesis, México, Prentice Hall Hispanoamericana, S. A.
Parenti, M. (1993): Inventing Reality: The Politics of News Media, Second Edition, Boston, Bedford/St. Martín’s.
Piñuel Raigada, J. L. (2002): “Epistemología, metodología y técnicas del análisis de contenido”, Estudios de Sociolingüística, 3(1), España, Universidad Complutense de Madrid. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.v3i1.1
Reese, S. D. and Pamela J. S. (1996): Mediating the Message. Theories of Influences on Mass Media Content, Second Edition, USA, Longman Publishers.
Roberts, G. and Klibanoff, H. (2006): The Race Beat. The Press, the Civil Rights Struggle, and the Awakening of a Nation, New York, Knopf, Borzoi Books, Random House, Inc.
Robinson, W. (1995): “El rol de la democracia en la política exterior norteamericana y el caso de Cuba”, in Dilla, H. (Comp.): La democracia en Cuba y el diferendo con los Estados Unidos, La Habana, Ediciones CEA, pp. 9-38.
Robinson, P. (1999): “The CNN effect: can the news media drive foreign policy?” Review of International Studies, 25, British International Studies Association, pp. 301-309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210599003010
Robinson, P. (2000): “The Policy Media Interaction Model: measuring media power during humanitarian crisis”, Journal of Peace Research 37/5, pp. 625-645. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343300037005006
Robinson, P. (2001): “Theorizing the Influence of Media on World Politics. Models of Media Influence on Foreign Policy”, European Journal of Communication, 16(4), SAGE Publications, pp. 523-544. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323101016004005