Acción conectiva y movilización conservadora: análisis del activismo digital contra el currículo escolar con enfoque de género en Perú
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4185/rlcs-2026-2553Palabras clave:
Acción conectiva, Política online, Movilización conservadora, Currículo escolar, Ideología de género, Polarización afectiva, Enfoque de géneroResumen
Introducción: La presente investigación tiene como objetivo examinar críticamente el periodo formativo de la movilización conservadora gestada en el Perú contra el currículo escolar con enfoque de género, en línea con el resurgimiento de movilizaciones similares en todo el mundo. Desde el concepto aplicado de acción conectiva (Bennet y Segerberg, 2012), la investigación evalúa y reflexiona sobre la actividad en la red social Facebook de grupos emergentes de activistas, quienes, por medio de sus publicaciones, estructuran una narrativa conservadora que los posiciona como agentes deliberantes. Metodología: Se desarrolló una base de datos compuesta por 6.221 publicaciones en línea, que activaron dos marchas masivas en la ciudad de Lima el año 2017. Dichas publicaciones fueron analizadas de manera sistemática mediante un modelo de machine learning implementado en un entorno de Jupyter Lab (Python 3.11). Resultados: La investigación muestra que existe una fuerte relación entre la simplificación de los mensajes, el uso intensivo de medios audiovisuales, y la radicalización de los discursos, con un crecimiento significativo de su base de seguidores. Discusión: Se discute cómo colectivos conservadores en Perú se articulan digitalmente sin estructuras jerárquicas. Se sostiene que la comunicación no solo refleja la organización, sino que la constituye, mediante formatos, nodos simbólicos y economía afectiva. Contrario a la “inercia colectiva”, se observa que las conexiones episódicas pueden generar comunidades políticamente efectivas. Conclusiones: La movilización conservadora en el Perú constituye un movimiento social que utiliza acción conectiva para difundir discursos antigénero simplificados y polarizadores. Esta estrategia digital configura una identidad política excluyente, incide en el debate público e institucional, y plantea desafíos para la cohesión social, la gobernabilidad democrática y las políticas educativas nacionales.
Descargas
Citas
Abas, J. M., Baui, L. Z. y Bondoc, A. (2025, May 22). Analyzing social media sentiments and progression of emotions over time on strategic gaps in video-on-demand digital streaming platforms. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5277948 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5277948
Acosta, M. (2019). Campañas electorales y plataformas digitales. La precandidatura de Alberto Fernández en Facebook. Question/Cuestión, 1(64). https://doi.org/10.24215/16696581e208 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24215/16696581e208
Ayers, J. W., Chu, B., Zhu, Z., Leas, E. C., Smith, D. M., Dredze, M. y Broniatowski, D. A. (2021). Spread of Misinformation About Face Masks and COVID-19 by Automated Software on Facebook. JAMA Internal Medicine, 181(9), 1251-1253. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.2498 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.2498
Bakardjieva, M. (2023). The other civil society: Digital media and grassroots illiberalism in Bulgaria. European Societies, 25(2), 304-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2021.1966072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2021.1966072
Bárcenas Barajas, K. (2022). Movimientos antigénero en América Latina: Cartografías del neoconservadurismo. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Barnes, N. (2022). LGBTQ Human Rights and Conservative Backlash: A Case Study of Digital Activism in Mexico. International Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, 3 (2), 1-11. https://ijahss.net/assets/files/1644688503.pdf
Benkler, Y., Farris, R. y Roberts, H. (2018). Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190923624.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190923624.001.0001
Bennett, W. L. y Livingston, S. (2025). Platforms, politics, and the crisis of democracy: Connective action and the rise of illiberalism. Perspectives on Politics, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592724002123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592724002123
Bennett, W. L. y Segerberg, A. (2012). The Logic of Connective Action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739-768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
Blee, K. M. (2017). How the study of white supremacism is helped and hindered by social movement research. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 22(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-22-1-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-22-1-1
Bob, C. (2012). The Global Right Wing and the Clash of World Politics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139031042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139031042
Brito, A. S. (2020). Disputando la opinión pública digital: #ConMisHijosNoTeMetas y los colectivos LGBTI en Ecuador. GIGAPP Estudios Working Papers, 7(166-182), Article 166-182. https://www.gigapp.org/ewp/index.php/GIGAPP-EWP/article/view/209
Carrera Walling, S. K. (2021). ¿Persuasión o manipulación? Con mis hijos no te metas: análisis crítico de su discurso en Facebook [Tesis]. UNMSM. https://cybertesis.unmsm.edu.pe/handle/20.500.12672/17300
Castro-Pérez, R. (2022). Performing Conservatism. A Study of Emerging Political Mobilisations in Latin America using “Social Media Drama” Analysis. En E. Costa, P. G. Lange, N. Haynes y J. Sinanan (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Media Anthropology (1.ª ed., pp. 465-478). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003175605-45 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003175605-45
Castro-Pérez, R. (2024). La “batalla mediática” de Padres En Acción y el discurso conservador en la escena política peruana. Letras (Lima), 95(141), 227-244. https://doi.org/10.30920/letras.95.141.14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30920/letras.95.141.14
Chagas, V. (2022). WhatsApp and Digital Astroturfing: A Social Network Analysis of Brazilian Political Discussion Groups of Bolsonaro’s Supporters. International Journal of Communication, 16, 2431-2455. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/17296
Chomel, V., Panahi, M. y Chavalarias, D. (2023). Manipulation During the French Presidential Campaign: Coordinated Inauthentic Behaviors and Astroturfing Analysis on Text and Images. En H. Cherifi, R. N. Mantegna, L. M. Rocha, C. Cherifi, y S. Miccichè (Eds.), Complex Networks and Their Applications XI (pp. 121-134). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21127-0_11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21127-0_11
Collins, J. (2024). The gift of Gab: A netnographic examination of the community building mechanisms in far-right online space. Terrorism and Political Violence, 37(3), 349-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2023.2296514 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2023.2296514
Cuesta-Cambra, U., Martínez-Martínez, L. y Niño-González, J.-I. (2019). An analysis of pro-vaccine and anti-vaccine information on social networks and the internet: Visual and emotional patterns. Profesional de La Información, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.mar.17 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.mar.17
Cuevas-Calderón, E., Dongo, E. Y. y Kanashiro, L. (2022). Conservadores en TikTok: Polarización social en el Perú. Revista Prisma Social, 39. https://revistaprismasocial.es/ps/article/view/4865
Davidson, T. (2021). Audience Engagement and the Dynamics of Online Activism: Far-Right Mobilization on Facebook [Preprint]. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/rwfjc DOI: https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/rwfjc
Doroshenko, L. y Tu, F. (2023). Like, Share, Comment, and Repeat: Far-right Messages, Emotions, and Amplification in Social Media. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 20(3), 286-302. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2022.2097358 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2022.2097358
Duárez Mendoza, J. L. (2024). El conservadurismo radical en Perú. El Caso de Renovación Popular (2020- 2024). Letras (Lima), 95(141), 73-92. https://doi.org/10.30920/letras.95.141.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30920/letras.95.141.5
Featherstone, J. D., Barnett, G. A., Ruiz, J. B., Zhuang, Y. y Millam, B. J. (2020). Exploring childhood anti-vaccine and pro-vaccine communities on twitter – a perspective from influential users. Online Social Networks and Media, 20, 100105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.osnem.2020.100105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.osnem.2020.100105
Fejős, A., Zentai, V., Bladini, M., Igareda, N., Helmstad, A., Pascale, A. A., Schulz, A., Sette, R., Sicurella, S., Svensson, E.-M. y Wilhelm, C. (2021). Anti-Gender Hate Speech in Populist Right-Wing Social Media Communication. https://ddd.uab.cat/record/250923
Ferré Pavia, C. y Sambucetti, M. F. (2022). El neoconservadurismo religioso en Twitter: La campaña #ConMisHijosNoTeMetas y el discurso contra la igualdad de género. Teknokultura: Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales, 19(1), 55-66. https://doi.org/10.5209/tekn.75368 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/tekn.75368
Figeac, J., Smyrnaios, N., Salord, T., Cabanac, G., Fraisier, O., Ratinaud, P. y Seffusatti, F. (2020). Information-sharing practices on Facebook during the 2017 French presidential campaign: An “unreliable information bubble” within the extreme right. Communications, 45(s1), 648-670. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2019-0193 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2019-0193
Fraxanet, E., Kaltenbrunner, A., Germano, F. y Gómez, V. (2025). Analyzing news engagement on Facebook: Tracking ideological segregation and news quality in the Facebook URL dataset [Preprint]. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.13461 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-025-00585-3
Freelon, D., Marwick, A. y Kreiss, D. (2020). False equivalencies: Online activism from left to right. Science, 369(6508), 1197-1201. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb2428 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb2428
Gallagher, R. J., Reagan, A. J., Danforth, C. M. y Dodds, P. S. (2018). Divergent discourse between protests and counter-protests: #BlackLivesMatter and #AllLivesMatter. PLOS ONE, 13(4), e0195644. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195644 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195644
Gerbaudo, P., De Falco, C. C., Giorgi, G., Keeling, S., Murolo, A. y Nunziata, F. (2023). Angry Posts Mobilize: Emotional Communication and Online Mobilization in the Facebook Pages of Western European Right-Wing Populist Leaders. Social Media + Society, 9(1), 205630512311633. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231163327 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231163327
Ghani, A. y Rahmat, H. (2023). Confirmation Bias in Our Opinions on Social Media: A Qualitative Approach. Journal of Communication, Language and Culture, 3(1), 47-53. https://doi.org/10.33093/jclc.2023.3.1.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33093/jclc.2023.3.1.4
Giglietto, F., Marino, G., Mincigrucci, R. y Stanziano, A. (2023). A Workflow to Detect, Monitor, and Update Lists of Coordinated Social Media Accounts Across Time: The Case of the 2022 Italian Election. Social Media + Society, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231196866 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231196866
Giglietto, F., Righetti, N., Rossi, L. y Marino, G. (2020a). Coordinated Link Sharing Behavior as a Signal to Surface Sources of Problematic Information on Facebook. International Conference on Social Media and Society, 85-91. https://doi.org/10.1145/3400806.3400817 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3400806.3400817
Giglietto, F., Righetti, N., Rossi, L. y Marino, G. (2020b). It takes a village to manipulate the media: Coordinated link sharing behavior during 2018 and 2019 Italian elections. Information, Communication & Society, 23(6), 867-891. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1739732 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1739732
Graham, T., Bruns, A., Zhu, G. y Campbell, R. (2020). Like a virus: The coordinated spread of coronavirus disinformation [Report]. Centre for Responsible Technology. https://apo.org.au/node/305864
Grover, T. y Mark, G. (2019). Detecting Potential Warning Behaviors of Ideological Radicalization in an Alt-Right Subreddit. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 13, 193-204. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v13i01.3221 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v13i01.3221
Gruzd, A., Mai, P. y Soares, F. B. (2022). How coordinated link sharing behavior and partisans’ narrative framing fan the spread of COVID-19 misinformation and conspiracy theories. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 12(1), 118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-022-00948-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-022-00948-y
Ham, C.-D., Lee, J., Hayes, J. L. y Bae, Y. H. (2019). Exploring sharing behaviors across social media platforms. International Journal of Market Research, 61(2), 157-177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470785318782790 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470785318782790
Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N. y Westwood, S. (2019). The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22, 129-146.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034
Jamieson, K. y Capella, J. (2010). Echo Chamber. Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment. Oxford University Press.
Kakavand, A. E. (2023). Far-right social media communication in the light of technology affordances: A systematic literature review. Annals of the International Communication Association, 48(1), 37-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2023.2280824 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2023.2280824
Kasimov, A. (2023). Decentralized hate: Sustained connective action in online far-right community. Social Movement Studies, 0(0), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2023.2204427 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2023.2204427
Keller, F. B., Schoch, D., Stier, S. y Yang, J. (2020). Political Astroturfing on Twitter: How to Coordinate a Disinformation Campaign. Political Communication, 37(2), 256-280. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1661888 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1661888
Kessler, G., Vommaro, G. y Paladino, M. (2021). Antipopulistas reaccionarios en el espacio público digital. Estudios Sociológicos de El Colegio de México, 40(120). https://doi.org/10.24201/es.2022v40n120.2213 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24201/es.2022v40n120.2213
Kim, C. y Yang, S.-U. (2017). Like, comment, and share on Facebook: How each behavior differs from the other. Public Relations Review, 43(2), 441-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.02.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.02.006
Kim, J. W. (2018). They liked and shared: Effects of social media virality metrics on perceptions of message influence and behavioral intentions. Computers in Human Behavior, 84, 153-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.030
Kim, S. y Kim, J. (2023). The Information Ecosystem of Conspiracy Theory: Examining the QAnon Narrative on Facebook. Actas de la ACM sobre interacción persona-computadora, 7(CSCW1). https://doi.org/10.1145/3579626 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3579626
Knüpfer, C. B., Yang, Y. y Cowburn, M. (2025, Septiembre 24). The logic of connective faction: How digitally-networked elites and hyper-partisan media radicalize politics. OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/2exfz_v3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/2exfz_v2
Knüpfer, C. y Klinger, U. (2025). In-groups and outrage: How narratives and affect shape digital surrogate networks and radicalize right-wing parties. En S. Livingston, y M. Miller (Eds.), Connective action and the rise of the far-right: Platforms, politics, and the crisis of democracy (Cap. 5). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197794937.003.0005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197794937.003.0005
Knüpfer, C., Hoffmann, M. y Voskresenskii, V. (2022). Hijacking MeToo: Transnational dynamics and networked frame contestation on the far right in the case of the ‘120 decibels’ campaign. Information, Communication & Society, 25(7), 1010-1028. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1822904 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1822904
Koltai, K. S. (2020). Human values and scientific controversies: Studying vaccine information behavior on social networking sites [Tesis]. The University of Texas at Austin. https://doi.org/10.26153/tsw/12582
Legua Aranibar, Y. E. (2021). Ministerio de Educación y con mis hijos no te metas: Disputa comunicativa y opinión pública sobre el currículo escolar 2017. USIL Repositorio Institucional. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14005/11620
Lerman, K., Feldman, D., He, Z. y Rao, A. (2024). Affective polarization and dynamics of information spread in online networks. npj Complexity 1, 8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44260-024-00008-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44260-024-00008-w
López, J. A. (2020). Aborto, contramovilización y estrategias de comunicación contra la expansión de derechos en México. Revista interdisciplinaria de estudios de género de El Colegio de México, 6. https://doi.org/10.24201/reg.v6i0.621 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24201/reg.v6i0.621
Lukito, J., Yang, Y. y Kim, S. J. (2025). How QAnon developed from a fringe group to a digital surrogate for the GOP. En S. Livingston, y M. Miller (Eds.), Connective action and the rise of the far-right: Platforms, politics, and the crisis of democracy (Cap. 3). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197794937.003.0003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197794937.003.0003
Luriaga, R. L., Samson, B. D., Mama, B. R. Z. I., Ebardo, R. A. (2025). LDA-Based Topic Modelling on COVID-19 FLiRT Variant in Social Media. En H. A. Le Thi, H. M. Le, y Q.T. Nguyen (Eds.), Advances in Data Science and Optimization of Complex Systems. ICAMCS 2024. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (1569). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-00267-9_11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-00267-9_11
Marwick, A., Clancy, B. y Furl, K. (2022). Far-Right Online Radicalization: A Review of the Literature. The Bulletin of Technology & Public Life. https://doi.org/10.21428/bfcb0bff.e9492a11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21428/bfcb0bff.e9492a11
McIvor, M. (2019). Human Rights and Broken Cisterns: Counterpublic Christianity and Rights-based Discourse in Contemporary England. Ethnos, 84(2), 323-343. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2017.1420671 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2017.1420671
McNerney, H. W., Spann, B., Mead, E. L., Kready, J., Marcoux, T. y Agarwal, N. (2022). Assessing the influence and reach of digital activity amongst far-right actors: A comparative evaluation of mainstream and ‘free speech’ social media platforms. For(e)Dialogue, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.21428/e3990ae6.60c47409 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21428/e3990ae6.60c47409
Meneses, D. (2019). Con Mis Hijos No Te Metas: Un estudio de discurso y poder en un grupo de Facebook peruano opuesto a la «ideología de género». Anthropologica, 37(42), 129-154. https://doi.org/10.18800/anthropologica.201901.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18800/anthropologica.201901.006
Minici, M., Luceri, L., Cinus, F. y Ferrara, E. (2024). Uncovering Coordinated Cross-Platform Information Operations Threatening the Integrity of the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election Online Discussion. SSRN http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4965049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4965049
Muro Ampuero, E. (2022). Neo-Pentecostalism and religious conservatism on Facebook: A digital ethnography in Peruvian Pro-Family and Pro-Life groups. Desde El Sur, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.21142/DES-1401-2022-0017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21142/DES-1401-2022-0017
Páez González, C. L. y Peña García, A. de la. (2018). El discurso sobre género en la página de Facebook del Movimiento Pro Vida y Pro Familia en Paraguay. Chasqui: Revista Latinoamericana de Comunicación, 139, 229-243. https://revistachasqui.org/index.php/chasqui/article/view/3728
Pariser, E. (2017). El Filtro burbuja: cómo la red decide lo que leemos y lo que pensamos. Taurus.
Páucar Villacorta, D. (2025). Data_Accion_Conectiva [Data Set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15368544
Peredo Rodríguez, V. (2022). Organización, discurso y actividad digital. Una aproximación al movimiento antivacunas en grupos de Whatsapp. Punto Cero, 27(44), 71-88. https://doi.org/10.35319/puntocero.202244192 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35319/puntocero.202244192
Pérez-Vela, R. (2022). Activismos religiosos neo-progresistas: La narrativa contestataria evangélica en el espacio público peruano. Iztapalapa. Revista de ciencias sociales y humanidades, 43(92), 73-110. https://doi.org/10.28928/ri/922022/atc3/perezvelar DOI: https://doi.org/10.28928/ri/922022/atc3/perezvelar
Pond, P. y Lewis, J. (2019). Riots and Twitter: Connective politics, social media and framing discourses in the digital public sphere. Information, Communication & Society, 22(2), 213-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1366539 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1366539
Recuero, R., Soares, F. B., Vinhas, O., Volcan, T., Hüttner, L. R. G. y Silva, V. (2022). Bolsonaro and the Far Right: How Disinformation About COVID-19 Circulates on Facebook in Brazil. International Journal of Communication, 16, 148-171. https://ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk/id/eprint/19805/1/17724-61165-2-PB.pdf
Reguer-Petit, M. y Morabito, L. (2017). Les traces de La Manif pour tous. En F. Gougou, y V. Tiberj(Dir.). La déconnexion électorale. Un état des lieux de la démocratie française. Fondation Jean-Jaurès.
Rim, H., Lee, Y. y Yoo, S. (2020). Polarized public opinion responding to corporate social advocacy: Social network analysis of boycotters and advocators. Public Relations Review, 46(2), 101869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101869 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101869
Rohlinger, D. A. y Bunnage, L. (2017). Did the Tea Party Movement Fuel the Trump-Train? The Role of Social Media in Activist Persistence and Political Change in the 21st Century. Social Media + Society, 3(2), 2056305117706786. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117706786 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117706786
Romero-Rodríguez. L., Castillo-Abdul, B. y Cuesta-Valiño, P. (2023). The Process of the Transfer of Hate Speech to Demonization and Social Polarization. Politics and Governance, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.i349 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i2.6663
Ross-Arguedas, A., Robertson, C., Fletcher, R. y Nielsen, R. (2022). Echo chambers, filter bubbles, and polarisation: a literature review. Reuters Institute. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/echo-chambers-filter-bubbles-and-polarisation-literature-reviewZ
Schradie, J. (2019). The Revolution That Wasn’t: How Digital Activism Favors Conservatives. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674240438 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674240438
Sgró-Ruata, C. (2021). Política sexual, activismo conservador y redes sociodigitales. Virtualis, 12(23), 67-94. https://doi.org/10.46530/virtualis.v12i23.384 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46530/virtualis.v12i23.384
Shahin, S. y Ng, Y. M. M. (2022). Connective action or collective inertia? Emotion, cognition, and the limits of digitally networked resistance. Social Movement Studies, 21(4), 530-548. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2021.1928485 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2021.1928485
Sundar, S. S., Snyder, E. C., Liao, M., Yin, J., Wang, J. y Chi, G. (2024). Sharing without clicking on news in social media. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02067-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02067-4
Tello, K. (2019). Causas de la politización reactiva del conservadurismo evangélico en el Perú contemporáneo. Politai: Revista de Ciencia Política, 19, 13-33. https://doi.org/10.18800/politai.201902.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18800/politai.201902.001
Tenenboim, O. (2022). Comments, Shares, or Likes: What Makes News Posts Engaging in Different Ways. Social Media + Society, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221130282 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221130282
Theocharis, Y., Boulianne, S., Koc-Michalska, K. y Bimber, B. (2023). Platform affordances and political participation: How social media reshape political engagement. West European Politics, 46(4), 788-811. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2022.2087410 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2022.2087410
Thompson, N., Wang, X. y Daya, P. (2020). Determinants of News Sharing Behavior on Social Media. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 60(6), 593-601. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2019.1566803 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2019.1566803
Törnberg, A. y Törnberg, P. (2023). White supremacists anonymous: How digital media emotionally energize far-right movements. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 22(1), 131-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2023.2262459 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2023.2262459
Vico, E. A. y Rey, P. R. (2020). Discurso, estrategias e interacciones de Vox en su cuenta oficial de Instagram en las elecciones del 28-A. Derecha radical y redes sociales. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 77. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2020-1455 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2020-1455
Xu, W. W. (2020). Mapping Connective Actions in the Global Alt-Right and Antifa Counterpublics. International Journal of Communication, 14(0). https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/11978
Yoshida, M., Sakaki, T., Kobayashi, T. y Toriumi, F. (2021). Japanese conservative messages propagate to moderate users better than their liberal counterparts on Twitter. Scientific Reports, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98349-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98349-2
Yu, W. E. S. (2022). A Framework for Studying Coordinated Behaviour Applied to the 2019 Philippine Midterm Elections. En X.-S. Yang, S. Sherratt, N. Dey, y A. Joshi (Eds.), Proceedings of Sixth International Congress on Information and Communication Technology (pp. 721-731). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2380-6_63 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2380-6_63
Yuan, X., Schuchard, R. J. y Crooks, A. T. (2019). Examining Emergent Communities and Social Bots Within the Polarized Online Vaccination Debate in Twitter. Social Media + Society, 5(3), 2056305119865465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119865465 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119865465
Żuk, P. y Żuk, P. (2020). Right-wing populism in Poland and anti-vaccine myths on YouTube: Political and cultural threats to public health. Global Public Health, 15(6), 790-804. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2020.1718733 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2020.1718733
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Raúl Castro-Pérez, Santiago Tejedor, Luis M. Romero-Rodríguez, Diego Páucar-Villacorta
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Datos de los fondos
-
Universidad Científica del Sur
Números de la subvención 029-2023-PRO99
