TV and Capitalization of Free Time. TV Programming as Means of Production

Authors

  • Richard Danta Catholic University of Uruguay

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4185/10.4185/RLCS-64-2009-846-572-584

Keywords:

TV Programming, Discursive Strategy, Cultural Proximity, Capitalization, Added Time

Abstract

This paper tries to build a conceptual bridge between the communication theories and the contemporary economic ones, concentrating on the added value concept on television industry. More specifically, it pays especial attention to the idea of considering television programming as a means of production that is able to capitalize the emission by using location strategies (day and time in which a television show is offered to the target audience), as well as contents strategies (the narrative nature of TV shows as a cultural message). TV programming, discursive strategy, message, format, narrative genre and cultural proximity are some of the communication and technical categories that will be confronted and judged against economic notions of capitalized value, such as: added time, economic yield and cultural commodity; in order to formulate a theoretical model that allows to understand TV programming as a means of production in all of its industrial implications.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Richard Danta, Catholic University of Uruguay

Richard Danta is Uruguayan and has a degree in Communication Sciences from the University of the Republic of Uruguay (UdelaR) and a PhD candidate from the University of Salamanca, Spain.

He has developed a varied university teaching activity, in the areas of Organizational Communication, Semiotics and Communication Theory. He currently teaches courses in General Semiotics and Linguistics (UCUDAL), and Theory of Communication in Design (CDI).

He has also published in various specialized media, both in Uruguay and in international media.

References

Albornoz, L. (2000): Al fin solos… la nueva televisión del Mercosur. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Ciccus.

Chong, D. y Druckman, J. N. (2007): “Framing Theory”, en Annual Review of Political Science, 10, pp. 103-126.

Cortés, J. Á. (2001): La estrategia de la seducción. La programación en la neotelevisión. Pamplona: Eunsa.

González Requena, J. (1988): El discurso televisivo: espectáculo de la postmodernidad. Madrid: Cátedra.

Grandi, R. (1995): Texto y contexto en los medios de comunicación. Barcelona: Bosch.

Igartua, J. J. y Badillo, Á. (comps.) (2003): Audiencias y medios de comunicación. Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca.

Jhally, S. (1982): “Probing The Blindspot: The Audience Commodity”. En Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory / Revue Canadienne de Théorie Politique et Sociale, 6(1-2), pp. 204-210.

Livant, B. (1979): “The Audience Commodity: On The 'Blindspot' Debate”. En Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory / Revue Canadienne de Théorie Politique et Sociale, 3(1), pp. 91-106.

Livant, B. (1982): “Working At Watching: A Reply To Sut Jhally”. Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory / Revue Canadienne de Théorie Politique et Sociale, 6(1-2), 211-215.

Lozano Rendón, J. C. (2000): “Oferta y consumo de contenidos televisivos transnacionales en México”. En Revista de Estudios sobre las Culturas Contemporáneas, época 2, 6(12), 111-126.

McChesney, R. W. (1993): “Critical Communication Research at the Crossroads”. En Journal of Communication, 43(4), 98-104.

Meehan, E. R., Mosco, V. y Wasko, J. (1995): “Rethinking Political Economy: Change and Continuity”. En Journal of Communication, 43(4), 105-116.

Murdock, G. (1978): “Blindspots About Western Marxism: A Reply To Dallas Smyth”, en Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory / Revue Canadienne de Théorie Politique et Sociale, 2(2), 109-119.

Prado, E. (1992): “Nuevas tendencias de la programación televisiva. Tendencias internacionales de programación televisiva”. En Telos, 31, 66-71

Prieto Barrero, M., et al. (1993): Audiencia y programación. Valencia: Ente Público Radiotelevisión Valenciana.

Saló, G. (2003): ¿Qué es eso del formato? Barcelona: Gedisa.

Scheufele, D. A. (1999): “Framing as a Theory of media Effects”. En Journal of Communication, 49(1), pp. 103-122.

Schiller, D. (1988): "How to think about information". En Mosco y Wasko (eds.) Political economy of information. Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press, 27-43.

Smythe, D. (1977): “Communications: Blindspot Of Western Marxism”. En Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory / Revue Canadienne de Théorie Politique et Sociale, 1(3), pp. 1-27.

Straubhaar, J., et al. (2002): “Refocusing From Global to Regional Homogenization of Television: Production and Programming in the Latino U.S. Market, Mexico and Venezuela”. Paper submitted to ALAIC Theory & Research Division. Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia.

Vaca Berdayes, R. (1997): Quién manda en el mando. Comportamiento de los españoles ante la televisión. Madrid: Visor.

VV. AA. (2001): Modos de hacer. Arte crítico, esfera pública y acción directa (Eds. Blanco, P., Carrillo, J., Claramonte, J. y Expósito, M.). Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.

Wilkinson, K. T. (2004): “La diferencia de lenguas en la exportación de telenovelas”. En Global Media Journal en español, 1(1) https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/687/68710108.pdf [Consultado el 20 de abril de 2006]

Yarto, C. y Lozano Rendón, J. C. (2004): “Televisión, rutinas y vida cotidiana en mujeres de México, Guadalajara y Monterrey”, en Global Media Journal en español, 1(1) en https://bit.ly/3bfNDyi [Consultado el 20 de junio de 2006]

Published

2009-02-02

How to Cite

Danta, R. . (2009). TV and Capitalization of Free Time. TV Programming as Means of Production. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, (64), 572–584. https://doi.org/10.4185/10.4185/RLCS-64-2009-846-572-584

Issue

Section

Miscellaneous