Repensando los derechos digitales a través de los problemas sistémicos de la comunicación



Palabras clave:

derechos de la comunicación, reforma mediática, justicia social, activismo mediático, derechos digitales, representación de problemas, análisis del discurso


Introducción: Los recientes debates políticos y de expertos en torno a los problemas del entorno digital han promovido diferentes conceptualizaciones de los derechos digitales. Sin embargo, los problemas actuales relacionados con la comunicación digital no tienen en cuenta los debates anteriores relacionados con la democratización de los medios. Este artículo propone que hay una necesidad de volver a fundamentar los debates sobre derechos digitales en torno a los problemas sistémicos de la comunicación. Metodología: Concebido como una contribución teórica, el artículo conecta la investigación crítica reciente sobre los derechos digitales, con la literatura existente sobre el activismo democrático en los medios. Lo anterior, a través del análisis de las representaciones de problemas. Resultados: Los resultados identifican la existencia de representaciones problemáticas a lo largo del tiempo que siguen vigentes hoy, tanto en el mundo digital como en los medios de comunicación, tales como: desigualdades en la distribución de los recursos comunicativos, propiedad y modelo económico del sistema de comunicación, y problemas de participación y exclusión. Discusión: El enfoque en las representaciones problemáticas permite identificar alternativas a los discursos dominantes hoy en día y ofrece un terreno para la colaboración entre activistas y académicos. Conclusiones: La investigación puede beneficiarse de un mayor diálogo entre el marco del activismo democrático de los medios de comunicación y los enfoques basados en los derechos para el entorno de la comunicación digital.


Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Outi Puukko, University of Helsinki

Outi Puukko es una investigadora doctoral en estudios de medios y comunicación en la Universidad de Helsinki. Sus intereses de investigación incluyen los roles de la sociedad civil en los discursos sobre los derechos digitales, el activismo mediático y los movimientos de justicia social.

Orcid ID:



Aouragh, M., & Chakravartty, P. (2016). Infrastructures of empire: Towards a critical geopolitics of media and information studies. Media, Culture & Society, 38(4), 559-575. DOI:

Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be? Pearson.

Bacchi, C., & Goodwin, S. (2016) Post-structural policy analysis: A guide to practice. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI:

Bennett, C. (2008). The privacy advocates. Resisting the spread of surveillance. MIT Press. DOI:

Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: The personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739-768. DOI:

Beraldo, D., & Milan, S. (2019). From data politics to the contentious politics of data. Big Data & Society, 6(2), 1-11. DOI:

Berger, D. (2009). Defining democracy: Coalition politics and the struggle for media reform. International Journal of Communication, 3, 3-22.

Candón-Mena, J., & Montero-Sánchez, D. (2021). From cyber-activism to technopolitics: A critical take on historical periods and orientations in the use of digital technology by social movements. International Journal of Communication, 15, 2921-2941.

Carlsson, U. (2003). The rise and fall of NWICO: From a vision of international regulation to a reality of multilevel governance. Nordicom, 24(2), 31-67. DOI:

Carpentier, N. (2011). Media and participation: A site of ideological-democratic struggle. Intellect Books. DOI:

Carroll, W. K., & Hackett, R. A. (2006). Democratic media activism through the lens of social movement theory. Media, Culture & Society, 28(1), 83-104 DOI:

Celeste, E. (2023). Digital constitutionalism: The role of internet bills of rights. Routledge. DOI:

Chakravartty, P. (2006). Who speaks for the governed? Economic & Political Weekly, 41(3).

Cohen, J. E. (2019). Between truth and power: The legal constructions of informational capitalism. Oxford University Press. DOI:

Constanza-Chock, S. (2020). Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds we need. MIT Press. DOI:

Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press. DOI:

CRIS Campaign. (2005). Assessing communication rights: A handbook.

Dencik, L. Hintz, A., & Cable, J. (2016). Towards data justice? The ambiguity of anti-surveillance resistance in political activism. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1-12. DOI:

Ericksson I., & Aslama, M. (2010). Making, breaking promises? Civic spheres and virtual engagements. New Media & Society, 12(4), 677-682. DOI:

Epstein, D., & Nonnecke, B. (2016). Multistakeholderism in praxis: The case of the regional and national Internet Governance Forum (IGF) initiatives. Policy and Internet, 8(2), 148-173. DOI:

Fenton, N., Freedman, D., Schlosberg, J., & Dencik, L. (2020). The media manifesto. Polity.

Foucault, M. (2002). Archaeology of knowledge. Routledge.

Freedman, D., Obar, J., Martens, C., & McChesney, R. (Eds.). (2016). Strategies for media reform: International perspectives. Fordham University Press. DOI:

Freedman, D., & Obar, J. (2019). Media development and media reform: Time for change. In N. Benequista, S. Abbott, P. Rothman, & W. Mano (Eds.), International media development. Historical perspectives and new frontiers (pp. 220-227). Peter Lang.

Gangadharan, S. P. (2014). Media justice and communication rights. In C. Padovani, & A. Calabrese (Eds.), Communication rights and social justice: Historical accounts of transnational mobilizations (pp. 203-218). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI:

Gangadharan, S. P. (2021). Digital exclusion: A politics of refusal. In L. Bernholz, H. Landemore, & R. Reich (Eds.), Digital technology and democratic theory (pp.113-140). University of Chicago Press. DOI:

Goggin, G., Ford, M., Martin, F., Webb, A., Vromen, A., & Weatherall, K. (2019). Digital rights in Asia: Rethinking regional and international agenda. Author version of chapter. In A. Athique, & E. Baulch (Eds.), Digital transactions in Asia: Economic, informational, and social exchanges. Routledge. DOI:

González-Rodríguez, G. (2012). New scenarios for the right to communicate in Latin America. In D. Frau-Meigs, et al. (Eds.), From NWICO to WSIS: 30 years of communication geopolitics (pp. 69-79). Intellect Books.

Gurumurthy, A., Singh, P. J., Chami, N., Bharthur, D., Sarkar S., Korjan, A., Kanchan, T., Bhagwat, S., & Yogesh, K.S. (Eds.). (2020). A digital new deal. Visions of justice in a post-COVID world. JustNet Coalition.

Hackett, R. A., & Carroll, W. K. (2006). Remaking media: The struggle to democratize public communication. Routledge. DOI:

Hamelink, C. (2014). Communication rights and the history of ideas. In C. Padovani, & A. Calabrese (Eds.), Communication rights and social justice: Historical accounts of transnational mobilizations (pp. 17-28). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI:

Hamelink, C., & Hoffmann, J. (2009). Communication as a human right: Picking up the challenge? In A. Dakroury, M. Eid, & Y. Kamalipour (Eds.), The right to communicate: Historical hopes, global debates, and future premises (pp. 71-106). Kendall Hunt.

Hoskins, G. (2021). Negating neutrality: The Marco Civil Da Internet, informational capitalism and contesting digital rights at the periphery [Doctoral dissertation, York University].

Isin, E., & Ruppert, E. (2015). Being digital citizens. Rowman & Littlefield.

Jørgensen, R. F. (2013). Framing the net: The internet and human rights. Edward Elgar. DOI:

Jørgensen, R. F. (Eds.). (2019). Human rights in the age of platforms. MIT Press. DOI:

Karaganis, J. (2011). Cultures of collaboration in media research. In P. Napoli, & M. Aslama (Eds.), Communications research in action: Scholar activist collaborations for a democratic public sphere, (pp. 287-312). Fordham University Press. DOI:

Karppinen, K. (2023). Problem definitions in European policy debates on media pluralism and online platforms. In T. Dwyer, & D. Wilding (Eds.), Media pluralism and online news: The consequences of automated curation for society. Intellect.

Karppinen, K., & Puukko, O. (2020). Four discourses of digital rights: Promises and problems of rights-based politics. Journal of Information Policy, 10, 304-328. DOI:

Kidd, D. (2014). Practicing communication rights: Cases from South Korea and Honduras. In C. Padovani, & A. Calabrese (Eds.), Communication rights and social justice: Historical accounts of transnational mobilizations (pp. 249-268). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI:

Mansell, R., & Nordenstreng, K. (2006). Great media and communication debates: WSIS and the MacBride report. Information Technologies and International Development, 3(4), 15-36. DOI:

McChesney, R. (1998). Media convergence and globalization. In D. K., Thussu (Ed.), Electronic empires – Global media and local resistance (pp. 27–46). Arnold and Oxford University Press.

McChesney, R. (2006). A cornerstone of the media reform movement. FAIR.

McChesney, R., & Nichols, J. (2002). Our media, not theirs: The democratic struggle against corporate media. Seven Stories Press.

McIver, W. J., Jr., Birdsall, W. F., & Rasmussen, M. (2003). The internet and right to communicate. First Monday, 8(12). DOI:

McKenna, A. (2012). The right to communicate. A continuing victim of historic links to NWICO and UNESCO? In D. Frau-Meigs, et al. (Eds.), From NWICO to WSIS: 30 years of communication geopolitics (pp. 93-106). Intellect Books.

McLaughlin, L., & Pickard, V. (2005). What is bottom-up about global internet governance? Global Media and Communication, 1(3), 357-373. DOI:

Mejias, U. (2020). To fight data colonialism, we need a non-aligned tech movement. Opinion. Al Jazeera.

Milan, S., & Padovani, C. (2014). Communication rights and media justice between political and discursive opportunities: An historical perspective. In C. Padovani, & A. Calabrese (Eds.), Communication rights and social justice: Historical accounts of transnational mobilizations (pp. 29-54). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI:

Mueller, M., Kuerbis, B., & Pagé, C. (2007). Democratizing global communication? Global civil society and the campaign for communication rights in the information society. International Journal of Communication, 1, 267-296.

Napoli, P. (2007). Public interest media activism and advocacy as a social movement: A review of the literature. McGannon Center Working Paper Series.

Napoli, P., & Aslama, M. (2011). Communications research in action: Scholar activist collaborations for a democratic public sphere. Fordham University Press. DOI:

Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. NYU Press. DOI:

Nordenstreng, K. (1984). Defining the new international information order. In G. Gerbner, & M. Siefert (Eds.), World communications: A handbook (pp. 28-36).

Nordenstreng, K. (2012). The history of NWICO and its lessons. In D. Frau-Meigs, et al. (Eds.), From NWICO to WSIS: 30 years of communication geopolitics (pp. 29-40). Intellect Books.

Our Data Bodies. (n.d.). Data Justice and Human Rights.

Padovani, C. (2005). Debating communication imbalances from the MacBride Report to the World Summit on the Information Society: An analysis of a changing discourse. Global Media and Communication, 1(3), 316-338. DOI:

Padovani, C., & Nordenstreng, K. (2005). From NWICO to WSIS: Another world information and communication order? Global Media and Communication, 1(3), 264-272. DOI:

Padovani, C., & Santaniello, M. (2018). Digital constitutionalism: Fundamental rights and power limitation in the Internet ecosystem. International Communication Gazette, 80(4), 295-301. DOI:

Park, J. (2021). Media reform and the climate emergency: Rethinking communication in the struggle for a sustainable future. University of Michigan Press. DOI:

Pickard, V. (2007) Neoliberal visions and revisions in global communications policy from NWICO to WSIS. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 31(2), 118-139. DOI:

Pickard, V., & Yang, G. (Eds.) (2017). Media activism in the digital age. Routledge. DOI:

Postigo, H. (2012). The digital rights movement: The role of technology in subverting digital copyright. MIT Press. DOI:

Postill, J. (2018). The rise of nerd politics: Digital activism and political change. Pluto. DOI:

Powell, A. (2012). Assessing the influence of online activism on internet policy-making: The case of SOPA/PIPA and ACTA. DOI:

Powell, C. (2018). Race and rights in the digital age. AJIL Unbound, 112, 339-343. DOI:

Pozner, J. L. (2011). Welcome to the media justice movement. The Representation Project.

Redeker, D., Gill, L., & Gasser, U. (2018). Towards digital constitutionalism? Mapping attempts to craft Internet Bill of Rights. The International Communication Gazette, 80(4), 302-319. DOI:

Rodríguez, C., & Iliadis, A. (2019). The MacBride Report legacy and media democracy today. Media Development, 3, 17-24.

Siapera, E., & Kirk, N. (2022). Social media, electoral campaigns and regulation of hybrid political communication; rethinking communication rights. In E. Celeste, A. Heldt, & C. Iglesias Keller (Eds.), Constitutionalising social media (pp. 119-138). Hart Publishing. DOI:

Snorton, C. (2009). New beginnings: Racing histories, democracy and media reform. International Journal of Communication, 3, 23-41.

Sorce, G. (2021). Theorizing feminist-democratic media activism via NGO media activism in South Africa. In G. Sorce (Ed.), Global perspectives on NGO communication for social change (pp.160-178). Routledge. DOI:

Svedin, I. (2014). Continuities and change in the nexus of communication and development. In C. Padovani, & A. Calabrese (Eds.), Communication rights and social justice: Historical accounts of transnational mobilizations (pp. 74-93). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI:

Taylor, L. (2017). What is data justice? The case for connecting digital rights and freedoms globally. Big Data & Society, 4(2), 1-14. DOI:

Themba-Nixon, M. (2009). Mainstreams and margins: A critical look at the media reform “story.” International Journal of Communication, 3, 54-56.

Thussu, D. K. (Ed.). (1998). Electronic empires – Global media and local resistance. Arnold and Oxford University Press.

WSIS Civil Society Plenary. (2003). Shaping information societies for human needs. Civil Society Declaration to the World Summit on the Information Society.

Wodajo, K. (2022). Mapping (in)visibility and structural injustice in the digital space. Journal of Responsible Technology, 9, 100024. DOI:

Wolfson, T. (2014). Digital rebellion: The birth of the cyber left. University of Illinois. DOI:

Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Public Affairs.

Zuboff, S. (2020). You are now remotely controlled. The New York Times.



Cómo citar

Puukko, Outi. 2023. «Repensando Los Derechos Digitales a través De Los Problemas sistémicos De La comunicación». Revista Latina De Comunicación Social, n.º 82 (julio):1-19.



Comunicación, justicia social y reforma mediática

Datos de los fondos