Uso de Twitter en los MOOC: Nuevas formas de interacción juvenil y su influencia en el aprendizaje
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2018-1309Palabras clave:
Twitter, MOOC, Retroalimentación, Interacción, Engagement, Aprendizaje colaborativoResumen
Este artículo analiza las nuevas formas de interacción de los jóvenes dentro de un entorno de aprendizaje no formal, en la enseñanza a través de MOOC. El objetivo es identificar la influencia de la retroalimentación a través de Twitter en el aprendizaje de los estudiantes. Metodología: en primer lugar, se realiza un análisis de regresión múltiple para determinar qué factores tienen mayor efecto sobre el aprendizaje y, posteriormente, determinar en qué medida influye la retroalimentación, tanto dada como recibida, en diferentes variables: compromiso, motivación, participación, disfrute/satisfacción, autoevaluación y resultados de aprendizaje, mediante un contraste de medias por segmentos. Resultados: se constata que dar retroalimentacióna través de Twitter influye positivamente en el aprendizaje, mientras que recibirlo pasivamente no obtiene resultados concluyentes. Discusión y conclusiones:tanto la motivación y la participación de los estudiantes como la satisfacción con el uso del diálogo de Twitter tienen un efecto positivo sobre el aprendizaje.
Descargas
Citas
Abella García, V. & Delgado Benito, V. (2015): “Aprender a usar Twitter y usar Twitter para aprender”. Revista de currículum y formación de profesorado, 19(1), 364-378.
Angeli, C., Valanides, N. & Bonk, C. J. (2003): “Communication in a Web-based conferencing system: The quality of computer‐mediated interactions”. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 31-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00302
Badge, J., Johnson, S., Moseley, A. & Cann, A. (2012): “Observing emerging student networks on a microblogging service”. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 90–98. Accesible en http://jolt.merlot.org/vol7no1/cann_0311.htm
Bannan-Ritland, B. (2002): “Computer-Mediated Communication, eLearning, and Interactivity: A Review of the Research”. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(2), 161-79.
Bazzo de Espíndola, M., Struchiner, M. & Rabetti, T. (2010): “Integração de Tecnologias de Informação e Comunicação noEnsino: Contribuições dos Modelos de Difusão e Adoção de Inovações para o campo da Tecnologia Educacional”. Relatec: Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa, 9(1), 89-106. Accesible en https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3269034
Blasco Arcas, L., Buil, I., Hernández Ortega, B. & Sesé, F. J. (2013): “Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance”. Computers and Education, 62,102-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.019
Cabero, J. (2006): “Bases pedagógicas del e-learning”. RUSC, Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento, 3(1), pp 1-10.
Caldwell, J. M. (2015): Going where students are: Comparing faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking in education. Chattanooga, Tennessee: University of Tennessee at Chattanooga.
Carpenter, J. P. (2014): “Twitter’s capacity to support collaborative learning”. Int. J. of Social Media and Interactive Learning Environments, 2(2), 103–118. https://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJSMILE.2014.063384 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMILE.2014.063384
Castaño Garrido, C., Maiz Olazabalaga, I. & Garay Ruiz, U. (2015): “Redes sociales y aprendizaje cooperativo en un MOOC”. Revista Complutense de Educación, 26, pp 119-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_RCED.2015.v26.46328
Chou, C. (2003): “Interactivity and interactive functions in web-based learning systems: a technical framework for designers”. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3), pp 265-279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00326
Conole, G., Galley, R. & Culver, J. (2011): “Frameworks for Understanding the Nature of Interactions, Networking, and Community in a Social Networking Site for Academic Practice”. IRROLD, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), pp. 119-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.914
Cotner, S. H., Fall, B. A., Wick, S. M., Walker, J. D. & Baepler, P. M. (2008): “Rapid feedback assessment methods: Can we improve engagement and preparation for exams in large- enrollment courses?” Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(5), pp. 437-443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9112-8
Dirckinck Holmfeld, C. L., Hodgson, V. & Mcconnell, D. (Eds.). (2012): Exploring the Theory, Pedagogy and Practice of Networked Learning. New York: Springer. https://bit.ly/3dr9cL1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0496-5
Domizi, D. P. (2013): “Microblogging to foster connections and community in a weekly graduate seminar course”. TechTrends, 57(1), pp. 43-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-012-0630-0
Draper, S. W. & Brown, M. I. (2004): “Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system”. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(2), pp. 81-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00074.x
Duque, A. P. G., Pérez, M. E. D. M. & De Guevara, F. G. L. (2012): “Usos de Twitter en las universidades iberoamericanas”. Relatec: Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa, 11(1), pp. 27-39.
Dunlap, J. C. & Lowenthal, P. R. (2009). “Tweeting the night away: Using Twitter to enhance social presence”. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), pp. 129.
Ebner, M., Lienhardt, C., Rohs, M. & Meyer, I. (2010): “Microblogs in Higher Education–A chance to facilitate informal and process-oriented learning?”. Computers & Education, 55(1), pp. 92-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.006
Erickson, J. & Siau, K. (2003): “E-ducation”. Communications of the ACM, 46(9), pp. 134-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/903893.903928
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T. & Archer, W. (2001): “Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education”. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), pp. 7-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071
Gabelas Barroso, J. A. (2010). “Escenarios virtuales, cultura juvenil y educomunicación 2.0”, en Aparici, R. (coord.). Educomunicación 2.0. Gedisa. Barcelona.
Gao, F., Luo, T. & Zhang, K. (2012): “Tweeting for learning: A critical analysis of research on microblogging in education published in 2008–2011”. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(5), pp. 783–801. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01357.x
Greenhow, C. & Robelia, B. (2009): “Old communication, new literacies: Social network sites as social learning resources”. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 14(4), pp. 1130-1161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01484.x
Grosseck, G. (2009): “To use or not to use web 2.0 in higher education? World Conference on Educational Sciences”. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 478–482. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.087
Grosseck, G. & Holotescu, C. (2008). “Can we use Twitter for educational activities?” Proceedings of the Fourth International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education, Bucharest, Romania.
Grosseck, G. & Holotescu, C. (2010): “Microblogging multimediabased teaching methods best practices with Cirip.eu.” ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), pp. 2151–2155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.297
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. & Black, W. C. (1999): Análisis multivariante. Madrid: Prentice Hall.
Higgins, R., Hartley, P. & Skelton, A. (2020): “The Conscientious Consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning”. Studies in Higher Education. 27(1), 53-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070120099368
Holotescu, C. & Grosseck, G. (2010): “Learning to microblog and microblogging to learn. A case study on learning scenarios in a microblogging context”. Proceedings of The 6th International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education Bucharest (15-16). Bucharest, Romania.
Johnson, K. A. (2011): “The effect of Twitter posts on students’ perceptions of instructor credibility”. Learning, Media and Technology, 36(1), 21-38, https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2010.534798 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2010.534798
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. & Holubec, E. (2013): Cooperation in the classroom (9th ed.). Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company
Junco, R., Elavsky, C. M. & Heibergert, G. (2013): “Putting twitter to the test: Assessing outcomes for student collaboration, engagement and success”. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), 273-287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01284.x
Junco, R., Heibergert, G. & Loken, E. (2011): “The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades”. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 119-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00387.x
Kassens Noor, E. (2012): “Twitter as a teaching practice to enhance active and informal learning in higher education: The case of sustainable tweets”. Active Learning in Higher Education, 13(1), pp. 9-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787411429190
Kirschner, P. A. & Karpinski, A. C. (2010): “Facebook® and academic performance”. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), pp. 1237-1245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.024
Knox, J. (2014): “Digital culture clash: “Massive” education in the E-learning and Digital Cultures MOOC”. Distance Education, 35(2), 164-177. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2014.917704 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2014.917704
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A. & Jochems, W. (2003): “Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research”. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), pp. 335-353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00057-2
Kryder, L. G. (1999): Integrating Computer Literacy: Why and What Can Be Done. Business Communication Quarterly, 62(2), 81-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/108056999906200209
Liu, T. C., Liang, J. K., Wang, H. Y., Chan, T. W. & Wei, L. H. (2003): “Embedding educlick in classroom to enhance interaction”. Proceedings of International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE), pp. 117-125.
Lomicka, L. & Lord, G. (2012): “A tale of tweets: Analyzing microblogging among language learners”. System, 40 (1), pp. 48-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.11.001
López Zapico, M. A. & Tascón Fernández, J. (2013): “El uso de Twitter como herramienta para la enseñanza universitaria en el ámbito de las ciencias sociales. Un estudio de caso desde la historia económica”. Education in the knowledge society (EKS), 14 (2), pp. 316-345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.10233
Marta-Lazo, C., Gabelas Barroso, J. A. & Grandío, M. (2015): “La dimensión de recepción e interacción en la enseñanza universitaria española de educación mediática. En VVAA, La educación mediática en la universidad española (Eds., Ferrés Prats, J. & Masanet, M. J.). Madrid: Gedisa.
Marta-Lazo, C. & Gabelas Barroso, J. A. (2016): Comunicación Digital. Un modelo basado en el Factor R-elacional. Barcelona: UOC Press.
Marta-Lazo, C., Frau-Meigs, D. & Osuna-Acedo, S. (2018): “Collaborative lifelong learning and professional transfer. Case study: ECO European Project”. Interactive Learning Environments, pp. 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1451346
Mayer, R. E. & Wittrock, M. C. (2006): “Problem solving”. Handbook of Educational Psychology, 2, pp. 287-303.
Muñoz, L. R., Pellegrini-Lafont, C. & Cramer, E. (2014): “Using Social Media in Teacher Preparation Programs: Twitter as a Means to Create Social Presence”. Penn GSE Perspectives on Urban Education, 11(2), pp. 57-69.
Panitz, T. (1999): Collaborative versus Cooperative Learning: A Comparison of the Two Concepts Which Will Help Us Understand the Underlying Nature of Interactive Learning. Accesible en http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED448443.pdf
Pratton, J. & Hales, L. W. (1986): “The effects of active participation on student learning”. The Journal of Educational Research, 79(4), pp. 210-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1986.10885679
Prince, M. (2004). “Does active learning work? A review of the research”. Journal of Engineering Education (Washington), 93, pp. 223-232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
Resta, P. & Laferrière, T. (2007): “Technology in support of collaborative learning”. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), pp. 65-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9042-7
Rinaldo, S. B., Tapp, S. & Laverie, D. A. (2011): “Learning by Tweeting”. Journal of Marketing Education, 33(2), pp. 193–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475311410852
Rodríguez, A., García, E., Ibáñez, R., González, J. & Heine, J. (2009): “Las TIC en la educación superior: estudio de los factores intervinientes en la adopción de un LMS por docentes innovadores”. RELATEC: Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa, 8(1), pp. 35–51
Shafique, F., Anwar, M. & Bushra, M. (2010): “Exploitation of social media among university students: A case study“. Webology, 7(2).
Siau, K., Sheng, H. & Nah, F. F. H. (2006): “Use of a classroom response system to enhance classroom interactivity”. Education, IEEE Transactions on, 49(3), pp. 398-403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2006.879802
Siemens, G. (2005): “Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age”. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), pp. 3-10.
Stowell, J. R. & Nelson, J. M. (2007): “Benefits of electronic audience response systems on student participation, learning, and emotion”. Teaching of Psychology, 34(4), pp. 253-258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280701700391
Stepanyan, K., Borau, K. & Ullrich, C. (2010): “A social network analysis perspective on student interaction within the Twittermicroblogging environment”. Proceedings of Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2010 IEEE 10th International Conference, pp. 70–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2010.27
Stieger, S. & Burger, C. (2010): “Let’s go formative: Continuous student ratings with Web 2.0 application Twitter”. Cyberpsychology , Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(2), pp. 163–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0128
Tur, G. & Marin, V. I. (2015): “Enriqueciendo el aprendizaje con social media: las percepciones del alumnado sobre Twitter usado en una actividad de debate”. NAER New Approaches in Educational Research, 4(1), pp. 51-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2015.1.102
Ophus, J. D. & Abbitt, J. T. (2009): “Exploring the potential perceptions of social networking systems in university courses”. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(4), pp. 639-648.
Osuna-Acedo, S., Marta-Lazo, C. & Frau-Meigs, D. (2018). “De sMOOC a tMOOC, el aprendizaje hacia la transferencia profesional: El proyecto europeo ECO”. Comunicar, 26(55), pp. 105-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3916/C55-2018-10
Özsoy, S. (2011): “Use of New Media by Turkish Fans in Sport Communication: Facebook and Twitter”. Journal of Human Kinetics, 28, pp. 165-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10078-011-0033-x
Statista. (2018): Penetración de las redes sociales en España de 2010 a 2017. Accesible en https://es.statista.com/estadisticas/474955/redes-sociales-tasa-penetracion-usuarios-prevision-espana/
Wright, N. (2010): “Twittering in teacher education: Reflecting on practicum experiences”. Open Learning, 25(3), pp. 259-265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2010.512102
Zerega-Garaycoa, M. M. (2015): “Un “tuiterazo” por la independencia: una experiencia del uso de Twitter para la enseñanza de Historia”. AtoZ, novas práticas em informação e conhecimento, 4(2), 74-83. https://dx.doi.org/10.5380/atoz.v4i2.43596 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5380/atoz.v4i2.43596
enrollment courses?” Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(5), pp. 437-443.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
