“Si te engancha, compártela en redes sociales”. Efectos conjuntos de la similitud con el protagonista y el contacto imaginado en la intención de compartir una narración corta a favor de la inmigración
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2017-1209Palabras clave:
Persuasión narrativa, identificación con los personajes, transporte narrativo, similitud con el personaje, contacto intergrupal imaginado, inmigraciónResumen
Se analiza el efecto del contacto imaginado y de la similitud con el protagonista de una narración corta escrita en primera persona cuya meta era la mejora de las actitudes hacia inmigrantes estigmatizados. Método: Los participantes del experimento (N = 400) recibieron instrucciones de contacto intergrupal imaginado (versus instrucciones de control) inmediatamente antes de leer una narración en primera persona protagonizada por un inmigrante de origen marroquí con alta o baja similitud con la audiencia. Después de leer la narración cumplimentaron un cuestionario con las variables dependientes. Resultados: Se observó que la condición óptima de recepción, inducía una mayor identificación y transporte narrativo que la condición de control, lo que provocaba a su vez un mayor deseo de compartir el mensaje través de las redes sociales. Conclusiones: Se discuten los resultados en el contexto de la investigación sobre persuasión narrativa y reducción del prejuicio.
Descargas
Citas
Barbour, J. B., Doshi, M. J. & Hernández, L. H. (2015): “Telling global public health stories: narrative message design for issues management”. Communication Research, 43(6), 810–843. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215579224
Ben-David, A. & Matamoros-Fernández, A. (2016): “Hate speech and covert discrimination on social media: monitoring the Facebook pages of extreme-right political parties in Spain”. International Journal of Communication, 10, 1167–1193.
Berger, J. & Milkman, K. L. (2012): “What makes online content viral?” Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 192–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0353
Bilandzic, H. & Busselle, R. W. (2008): “Transportation and transportability in the cultivation of genre-consistent attitudes and estimates”. Journal of Communication, 58(3), 508–529. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00397.x
Braddock, K. & Dillard, J. P. (2016): “Meta-analytic evidence for the persuasive effect of narratives on beliefs, attitudes, intentions, and behaviors”. Communication Monographs, 83(4), 446–467. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2015.1128555
Busselle, R. & Bilandzic, H. (2009): “Measuring narrative engagement”. Media Psychology, 12(4), 321–347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260903287259
Cea D’Ancona, M. A. & Valles, M. S. (2014): Evolución del racismo, la xenofobia y otras formas conexas de intolerancia en España [Informe-Encuesta 2014]. Madrid: Ministerio de Empleo y Seguridad Social.
Chen, C. Y., Joyce, N., Harwood, J. & Xiang, J. (2017): “Stereotype reduction through humor and accommodation during imagined communication with older adults”. Communication Monographs, 84(1), 94–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2016.1149737
Chen, M., Bell, R. A. & Taylor, L. D. (2016): “Narrator point of view and persuasion in health narratives: the role of protagonist–reader similarity, identification, and self-referencing”. Journal of Health Communication, 21(8), 908–918. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.1177147
Cho, H., Shen, L. & Wilson, K. (2014): “Perceived realism: dimensions and roles in narrative persuasion”. Communication Research, 41(6), 828–851. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212450585
Chung, A. H. & Slater, M. D. (2013): “Reducing stigma and out-group distinctions through perspective-taking in narratives”. Journal of Communication, 63(5), 894–911. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12050
Cohen, J. (2001): “Defining identification: a theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters”. Mass Communication & Society, 4(3), 245–264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01
Cohen, J., Tal-Or, N. & Mazor-Tregerman, M. (2015): “The tempering effect of transportation: Exploring the effects of transportation and identification during exposure to controversial two-sided narratives”. Journal of Communication, 65(2), 237–258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12144
Cohen, J., Weimann-Saks, D. & Mazor-Tregerman, M. (2017): “Does character similarity increase identification and persuasion?”. Media Psychology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1302344
Crisp, R. J. & Husnu, S. (2011): “Attributional processes underlying imagined contact effects”. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(2), 275–287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210390721
Crisp, R. J., Husnu, S., Meleady, R., Stathi, S. & Turner, R. N. (2010): “From imagery to intention: A dual route model of imagined contact effects”. European Review of Social Psychology, 21(1), 188–236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2010.543312
Crisp, R. J. & Turner, R. N. (2009): “Can imagined interactions produce positive perceptions? Reducing prejudice through simulated social contact”. The American Psychologist, 64(4), 231–240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014718
Crook, B., Stephens, K. K., Pastorek, A. E., Mackert, M. & Donovan, E. E. (2016): “Sharing health information and influencing behavioral intentions: the role of health literacy, information overload, and the internet in the diffusion of healthy heart information”. Health Communication, 31(1), 60–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.936336
de Graaf, A. (2014): “The effectiveness of adaptation of the protagonist in narrative impact: similarity influences health beliefs through self-referencing”. Human Communication Research, 40(1), 73–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12015
de Graaf, A., Hoeken, H., Sanders, J. & Beentjes, J. W. J. (2012): “Identification as a mechanism of narrative persuasion”. Communication Research, 39(6), 802–823. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211408594
& Hoeken, H. (2016): “Characteristics of narrative interventions and health effects: a review of the content, form, and context of narratives in health-related narrative persuasion research”. Review of Communication Research, 4, 88–131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12840/issn.2255-4165.2016.04.01.011
Green, M. C. & Brock, T. (2002): “In the mind’s eye: Transportation-imagery model of narrative persuasion”. En M. C.
Green, J. J. Strange, T. y Brock, C. (Eds.), Narrative impact. Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 315–341). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Green, M. C. & Brock, T. C. (2000): “The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701
Green, M. C., Brock, T. C. & Kaufman, G. F. (2004): “Understanding media enjoyment: the role of transportation into narrative worlds”. Communication Theory, 14(4), 311–327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00317.x
Harwood, J. (2010): “The contact space: a novel framework for intergroup contact research”. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(2), 147–177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09359520
Harwood, J., Joyce, N., Chen, C. Y., Paolini, S., Xiang, J. & Rubin, M. (2017): “Effects of past and present intergroup communication on perceived fit of an outgroup member and desire for future intergroup contact”. Communication Research, 44(4), 530–555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214565926
Hayes, A. F. (2013): Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. Nueva York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Hayes, A. F. & Preacher, K. J. (2014): “Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable”. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67, 451–470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12028
Hoeken, H. & Fikkers, K. M. (2014): “Issue-relevant thinking and identification as mechanisms of narrative persuasion”. Poetics, 44, 84–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2014.05.001
Hoeken, H., Kolthoff, M. & Sanders, J. (2016): “Story perspective and character similarity as drivers of identification and narrative persuasion”. Human Communication Research, 42(2), 292–311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12076
Igartua, J. J. (2010): “Identification with characters and narrative persuasion through fictional feature films”. Communications, 35(4), 347–373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/comm.2010.019
Igartua, J. J. (2015): “Psicología social de los medios de comunicación”. En Sabucedo, J. M. & Morales, J. F. (Eds.), Psicología social (pp. 371–391). Madrid: Panamericana.
Igartua, J. J. & Barrios, I. (2012): “Changing real-world beliefs with controversial movies: processes and mechanisms of narrative persuasion”. Journal of Communication, 62(3), 514–531. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01640.x
Igartua, J. J. & Fiuza, D. (2017): “Persuading with narratives against gender violence. Effect of similarity with the protagonist on identification and risk-perception”. Palabra Clave (en prensa). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2018.21.2.10
Igartua, J. J. & Frutos, F. J. (2017): “Enhancing attitudes toward stigmatized groups with movies: Mediating and moderating processes of narrative persuasion”. International Journal of Communication, 11(1), 158–177.
Igartua, J. J. & Vega, J. (2016): “Identification with characters, elaboration, and counterarguing in entertainment-education interventions through audiovisual fiction”. Journal of Health Communication, 21(3), 293–300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2015.1064494
Kaufman, G. F. & Libby, L. K. (2012): “Changing beliefs and behavior through experience-taking”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027525
Kim, M., Shi, R. & Cappella, J. N. (2016): “Effect of character–audience similarity on the perceived effectiveness of antismoking PSAs via engagement”. Health Communication, 31(10), 1193–1204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2015.1048421
Knobloch-Westerwick, S. & Johnson, B. K. (2014): “Selective exposure for better or worse: its mediating role for online news’ impact on political participation”. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(2), 184–196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12036
Kreuter, M. W., Green, M. C., Cappella, J. N., Slater, M. D., Wise, M. E., Storey, D. y Woolley, S. (2007): “Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: a framework to guide research and application”. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 33(3), 221–235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02879904
Miles, E. & Crisp, R. J. (2013): “A meta-analytic test of the imagined contact hypothesis”. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17(1), 3–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430213510573
Moyer-Gusé, E. (2008): “Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages”. Communication Theory, 18(3), 407–425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00328.x
Moyer-Gusé, E., Chung, A. H. & Jain, P. (2011): “Identification with characters and discussion of taboo topics after exposure to an entertainment narrative about sexual health”. Journal of Communication, 61(3), 387–406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01551.x
Murphy, S. T., Frank, L. B., Chatterjee, J. S. & Baezconde-Garbanati, L. (2013): “Narrative versus Nonnarrative: The Role of Identification, Transportation, and Emotion in Reducing Health Disparities”. Journal of Communication, 63(1), 116–137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12007
Oatley, K. (2017): “Fiction: simulation of social worlds”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(8), 618–628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.06.002
Park, S. Y. (2012): “Mediated intergroup contact: concept explication, synthesis, and application”. Mass Communication and Society, 15(1), 136–159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2011.558804
Pettigrew, T. F. & Tropp, L. R. (2006): “A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
Sevillano, V., Basabe, N., Bobowik, M. & Aierdi, X. (2014): “Health-related quality of life, ethnicity and perceived discrimination among immigrants and natives in Spain”. Ethnicity & Health, 19(2), 178–197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2013.797569
Slater, M. D. & Rouner, D. (2002): “Entertainment-Education and Elaboration Likelihood: understanding the processing of narrative persuasion”. Communication Theory, 12(2), 173–191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00265.x
Tal-Or, N. & Cohen, J. (2010): “Understanding audience involvement: conceptualizing and manipulating identification and transportation”. Poetics, 38(4), 402–418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2010.05.004
Tal-Or, N. & Cohen, J. (2015): “Unpacking engagement: convergence and divergence in transportation and identification”. Annals of the International Communication Association, 40(1), 33–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2015.11735255
Tukachinsky, R. (2014): “Experimental manipulation of psychological involvement with media”. Communication Methods and Measures, 8(1), 1–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2013.873777
Tukachinsky, R. & Tokunaga, R. S. (2013): “The effects of engagement with entertainment”. Communication Yearbook, 37, 287–321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2013.11679153
Turner, R. N. & Crisp, R. J. (2010): “Imagining intergroup contact reduces implicit prejudice”. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(1), 129–142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/014466609X419901
Walter, N., Murphy, S. T. & Gillig, T. K. (2017): “To walk a mile in someone else’ s shoes: how narratives can change causal attribution through perceived interactivity”. Human Communication Research. Disponible en: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hcre.12112/full DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12112
Wojcieszak, M., Azrout, R., Boomgaarden, H., Alencar, A. P. & Sheets, P. (2017): “Integrating Muslim immigrant minorities: the effects of narrative and statistical messages”. Communication Research, 44(4), 582–607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215600490
Wojcieszak, M. & Kim, N. (2016): “How to improve attitudes toward disliked groups: the effects of narrative versus numerical evidence on political persuasion”. Communication Research, 43(6), 785–809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215618480
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
