Communication Research.Bibliometric analysis of themost-cited ISI-indexed Journals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-067-955-248-270Keywords:
Communication, Indexing, Scientific Databases, Evaluation, ResearchAbstract
This article examines some of the most common methodological problems in the evaluation of academic journals in the field of communication, based on the content analysis of the ten journals with the highest impact factors in the Social Sciences Citation Index. The analysis focuses on establishing the academic and research origins and links of the authors of the articles published by these scientific publications, as well as the most predominant subject matters, genres and methodologies among the articles of these publications. This research aims to achieve two objectives: On the one hand, to analyse the role of the evaluation of communication journals in the assessment of research, which will allow us to show the difficulties of applying the bibliometric methods used by Thomson Scientific to determine the impact of journals and, on the other hand, to establish a development frameworkfor thoseSpanish communication journals that meet some of the requirements of the Social Sciences Citation Index but are not yet indexed in it, either because their impact factor is still low or because of their lack ofinternational dissemination. This research has been financed by the University of Malaga’s Research Institute for Public Relations.
Downloads
References
Castillo, A. y Carretón, M. (2010): "Investigación en Comunicación. Estudio bibliométrico de las Revistas de Comunicación en España." En Revista Comunicación y Sociedad, 23(2), pp.289-327 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15581/003.23.36234
Fernández-Quijada, D. (2008): “Revistas científicas e índices de impacto. A propósito de “Hacer saber”. Revista Área Abierta, 20. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, pp. 1-10
Garfield, E. (1955): “Citation indexes to Science: a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas”, Science, 122, pp. 108-111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.122.3159.108
Garfield, E. (1996): “How can impact factors be improved?”, British Medical Journal, 313, pp. 411-413 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7054.411
Garfield, E. (1998): “Long-term vs short-term journal impact: does it matter?”. Scientist, 12, pp. 10-12
Garfield, E. (2003): “The meaning of the Impact Factor”, en Revista Internacional de Psicología Clínica y de la Salud/International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 3(2), pp. 363-369
Garfield, E. (2005): “The Agony and the Ecstasy. The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor”, International Congress on Peer Review And Biomedical Publication, Chicago.
Gross, P. L. K. & Gross, E. M. (1927): “College libraries and chemical education”. Science, 66, pp. 385-389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.66.1713.385
Pritchard, A. (1969): “Statistical Bibliography or Bibliometrics?”, Journal of Documentation, 25(4), pp. 348-349 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026482
Martínez-Nicolás, M. y Saperas-Lapiedra, E. (2011): "La investigación sobre Comunicación en España (1998-2007). Análisis de los artículos publicados en revistas científicas". En Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 66. (pp 101-129) La Laguna (Tenerife): Universidad de La Laguna, de http://www.revistalatinacs.org/11/art/926_Vicalvaro/05_Nicolas.html
López-Ornelas, M. (2010): "Estudio cuantitativo de los procesos de comunicación de Revista Latina de Comunicación Social (RLCS), 1998-2009". En Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 65. (pp. 538-552) La Laguna (Tenerife): Universidad de La Laguna, recuperado el 16 de enero de 2011, http://www.revistalatinacs.org/10/art3/917_Mexico/39_Maricela.html DOI: https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-65-2010-917-538-552
Park, H. W. & Leydesdorff, L. (2009): “Knowledge linkage structures in communication studies using citation analysis among communication journals”, Scientometrics, 81(1), pp. 157-175 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-2119-y
Van-Leeuwen, T. et al. (2001): “Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequences for international comparisons of national research performance”, Scientometrics. 51(1), pp. 335–346 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010549719484
Yitzhaki, M. (1998): “The ‘language preference’ in sociology: Measures of ‘language self-citation,’ ‘relative own-language preference indicator,’ and ‘mutual use of languages”, Scientometrics, 41(1-2), pp. 243-254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457981