Logics and orientations of digital activism. Froom use and appropriation to the development of autonomous tools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2023-1891Keywords:
social movements, technopolitic, ciberactivism, technological sovereignty, informational capitalAbstract
Introduction: The text departs from a theoretical review in order to distinguish two specific dynamics involving the use of commercial tools by activists on the one hand, and the development of autonomous technologies driven by social movements themselves on the other. Objectives: The aim of this article is to define various logics of digital activism by engaging critically with several scholar contributions that, generally through a historical analysis, allow us to establish theoretical distinctions and recognize differentiated logics of action when it comes to determining how social movements actually use digital technology. In the paper, critical engagement with the literature is examined against our empirical findings to challenge pre-existing assumptions, as well as evolutionary approaches sometimes observed in some of these contributions. The text also makes a point of transcending closed historical stages. Conclusions: The article’s conclusions point towards a multidimensionality of factors (pragmatic-utilitarian, strategic-tactical and ideological/identity-related) regulating the ways in which social movement leverage technology.
Downloads
References
Anduiza, E., Cristancho, C., & Sabucedo, J. M. (2014). Mobilization through online social networks: the political protest of the indignados in Spain. Information, Communication & Society, 17(6), 750-764. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.808360
Barbour, R. S. (2013). Los grupos de discusión en Investigación Cualitativa. Morata.
Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. Yale University Press.
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The Logic of Connective Action. Information, Communicatin and Society, 15(5), 739-768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
Bey, H. (1991). La zona temporalmente autónoma. Autonomedia.
Bielsa, E. (2021). From ‘the people’to the crowd: The push for independence in Catalonia. Social Science Information, 60(3), 395-412. https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184211021354 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184211021354
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.C. (1977). La reproducción. Elementos para una teoría del sistema de enseñanza. Laia.
Calle, A. (2013). La transición inaplazable. Icaria.
Callejo, J. (2009). Introducción a las técnicas de investigación social. UNED.
Cammaerts, B. (2015). Technologies of Self-Mediation: Affordances and Constraints of Social Media for Protest Movements. In: Uldam, J., & Vestergaard, A. (Eds). Civic Engagement and Social Media. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137434166_5v DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137434166_5
Cammaerts, B. (2012). Protest logics and the mediation opportunity structure. European Journal of Communication, 27(2), 117-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323112441007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323112441007
Candón-Mena, J. (2013). Toma la calle, toma las redes: El movimiento 15M en Internet. Atrapasueños. http://hdl.handle.net/11441/26074
Candón-Mena, J. (2019). Movilización cultural y artística en los movimientos tecnopolíticos contemporáneos. Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales, 16(1), 11-31. https://doi.org/10.5209/TEKN.63162 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/TEKN.63162
Candón-Mena, J. y Calvo, D. (2021). El legado de la cultura hacker en los movimientos y medios ciudadanos españoles. En: A. Barranquero y C. Sáez (eds.), La comunicación desde abajo. Historia, sentidos y prácticas de la comunicación alternativa en España (pp. 133-159). Gedisa. https://hdl.handle.net/11441/136809
Candón-Mena, J. and Montero-Sánchez, D. (2021). From cyber-activism to techno-politics. A critical take on historical periods and orientations in the use of digital technology by social movements. IJOC. International Journal of Communication, 15, 2921–2941. https://hdl.handle.net/11441/114962
Candón-Mena, J. y Treré, E. (2022). Visionarios pragmáticos: Imaginarios, mitos y tecnopolítica en el movimiento 15M. REIS. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 180, 47-64. https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.180.47 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.180.47
Casas, X., Varela, A. B. G., Monjelat, N., Romero, M. C. y Del Castillo Fernández, H. (2011). Herramientas comunicativas para el compromiso social: La plataforma N-1 en el 15M. En: Actas II Congreso Internacional Sociedad Digital: espacios para la interactividad y la inmersión, pp. 385-394. Icono 14.
Casero-Ripollés, A. (2015). Estrategias y prácticas comunicativas del activismo político en las redes sociales en España. Historia y Comunicación Social, 20(2), 533-548. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_HICS.2015.v20.n2.51399 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_HICS.2015.v20.n2.51399
Castells, M. (2001). La Galaxia Internet. DeBolsillo.
Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford University Press.
Cohen, J., & Arato, A. (1992). Civil Society and Political Theory. MIT Press.
Dahlberg, L. (2010). Cyber-libertarianism 2.0: A discourse theory/critical political economy examination. Cultural Politics, 6(3), 331-356. https://doi.org/10.2752/175174310X12750685679753 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2752/175174310X12750685679753
Della Porta, D. (2005). Making the Polis: Social Forums and Democracy in the Global Justice Movement. Mobilization, 10(1), 73-94. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.10.1.vg717358676hh1q6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.10.1.vg717358676hh1q6
Della Porta, D., & Mosca, L. (2007). In movimento: ‘contamination’ in action and the Italian Global Justice Movement. Global Networks, 7(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2006.00154.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2006.00154.x
Dencik, L., & Leistert, O. (Eds.) (2015). Critical perspectives on social media and protest: Between control and emancipation. Rowman & Littlefield International.
Downing, J. D. (2001). Radical Media: Rebellious, Communication and Social Movements. Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452204994
Fernández-Savater, A. (2009, 10 de febrero). De Indymedia a los blogs. Público. https://blogs.publico.es/fueradelugar/40/de-indymedia-a-los-blogs
Flesher Fominaya, C. (2014). Social movements and globalization: How protests, occupations and uprisings are changing the world. Palgrave Macmillan.
Flesher Fominaya, C. (2015). Debunking Spontaneity: Spain’s 15M/Indignados as Autonomous Movement. Social Movement Studies, 14(2), 142-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2014.945075 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2014.945075
Fuchs, C. (2014). OccupyMedia: The occupy movement and social media in crisis capitalism. John Hunt Publishing.
Galis, V., & Naumayer, C. (2016). Laying claim to social media by activists: A cyber-material detournement. Social Media & Society, 2(3), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116664360 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116664360
Gerbaudo, P. (2016). Social media teams as digital vanguards: the question of leadership in the management of key Facebook and Twitter accounts of Occupy Wall Street, Indignados and UK Uncut. Information, Communication & Society, 20(2), 185-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1161817 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1161817
Gerbaudo, P. (2017). From Cyber-Autonomism to Cyber-Populism: An Ideological Analysis of the Evolution of Digital Activism. TripleC, 15(2), 477-489. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v15i2.773 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v15i2.773
Grasso, D. (2011, 20 de julio). N-1: Una red social no mercantilizada es posible. Diagonal. https://www.diagonalperiodico.net/movimientos/n-1-red-social-no-mercantilizada-es-posible.html
Haché, A. (ed.). (2014). Soberanía tecnológica. Ritimo.
Hamelink, C. J. (2000). The Ethics of Cyberspace. Sage.
Haro, C. y Sampedro, V. F. (2011). Activismo político en Red: Del Movimiento por la Vivienda Digna al 15M. Teknokultura, 8(2), 157-175.
Hauge, B., & Loader, B. (1999). Digital democracy: Discourse and decking in information age. Routledge.
Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (2016). Narrative practice and the active interview. Sage.
Juris, J. S. (2012), Reflections on #Occupy Everywhere: Social media, public space, and emerging logics of aggregation. American Ethnologist, 39, 259-279.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1425.2012.01362.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1425.2012.01362.x
Karatzogianni, A. (2015). Firebrand Waves of Digital Activism 1994-2014. Palgrave McMillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137317933 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137317933
Leetoy, S., Gómez, A. y Vázquez, M. (2004). Guerrilla y comunicación. La propaganda política del EZLN. Catarata.
León, O. Burch, S. y Tamayo, E. (2001). Movimientos Sociales en la Red. ALAI.
Lévy, P. (2007). Cibercultura. La Cultura de la Sociedad Digital. Anthropos.
Lievrouw, L. (2011). Alternative and activist new media. Polity.
Margolis, M., & Resnick, D. (2000). Politics as usual: The cyberspace ‘revolution’. Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452233475
Mattelart, A., & Vitalis, A. (2015). De Orwell al cibercontrol. Gedisa.
Mattoni, A. (2012). Media practices and protest politics: How precarious workers mobilise. Ashgate Publishing.
Mattoni, A. (2017). A situated understanding of digital technologies in social movements. Media ecology and media practice approaches. Social Movement Studies, 16(4), 494-505.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2017.1311250 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2017.1311250
McChesney, R. W. (2012). Digital disconnect: How capitalism is turning the Internet against democracy. New Press.
Micó, J. L., & Casero-Ripollés, A. (2014). Political activism online: organization and media relations in the case of 15M in Spain. Information, Communication & Society, 17(7), 858-871. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.830634
Moreno-Caballud, L., & Grabner, L. (2015). Cultures of Anyone: Studies on Cultural Democratization in the Spanish Neoliberal Crisis. Liverpool University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1gn6bj7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1gn6bj7
Morozov, E. (2012). The net delusion: How not to liberate the world. Penguin.
Mosco, V.(2011). Sublimidad digital. Ciberespacio, mito y poder. Universidad Veracruzana.
O'Reilly, T. (2006). Qué es Web 2.0: Patrones del diseño y modelos del negocio para la siguiente generación del software. Telos, 3, 1-31.
Ortega-Barba, C. F. (2018). Recensión. Desafíos éticos en el escenario mediático digital. PAAKAT: Revista de Tecnología y Sociedad, 8(15), 103-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32870/Pk.a8n15.330
Padilla, M. (2012). El kit de la lucha en internet. Traficantes de Sueños
Perugorria, I., & Tejerina, B. (2018). Identity in the move: between emotional and relational processes of mobilization. In: Tejerina, B., & Perugorría, I. (Eds.). Crisis and Social Mobilization in Contemporary Spain: The 15M Movement, 36-53. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315574875 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315574875-3
Pfaffenberger, B. (1992). Technological dramas. Science, Technology & Human Values, 17(3), 282-312. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399201700302 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399201700302
Postill, J. (2016). Freedom technologists and the future of global justice. In: Buxton, N., & Eade, D. (Eds.) State of power: Democracy, sovereignty and resistance, 147-163. The Transnational Institute.
Randolph, J. (2009). A guide to writing the dissertation literature review. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(13), 1-13.
Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community. Addison Wesley.
Robles, J. M., & Ganuza, E. (2011). Internet y Deliberación. Dos ideas para comprender cómo afrontan los Indignados la participación política. Sociedad y Utopía, 38, 243-262.
Rochon, T. (1998). Culture Moves: Ideas, Activism, and Changing Values. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691186719 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691186719
Romanos, E. (2018). Del 68 al 15M: Continuidades y Rupturas entre Ciclos de Protesta. Arbor, 194(787), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2018.787n1003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2018.787n1003
Rovira, G. (2017). Activismo en red y multitudes conectadas. Comunicación y acción en la era de Internet. Icaria.
Sampedro, V. F. (2005). 13-M Multitudes On-line. Catarata.
Schradie, J. (2019). The revolution that wasn’t: How digital activism favors conservatives. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674240438 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674240438
Shah, A. (2017). Ethnography? Participant observation, a potentially revolutionary praxis. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 7(1), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau7.1.008
Shirky, C. (2009). Here comes everybody: How change happens when people come together. Penguin UK. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau7.1.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14318/hau7.1.008
Sierra Caballero, F. (2008). Capital informacional y apropiación social de las nuevas tecnologías. Telos, 74, 126-133.
Surman, M. y Reilly, K. (2005). Apropiarse de Internet para el cambio social. Cuadernos de trabajo de Hegoa, 38, 1-93.
Teruel, L. y Cabello, F. (2006). Hackeando la frontera: Presentación de Indymedia Estrecho. Razón y Palabra, 49.
Tillery, A. B. (2019). What Kind of Movement Is Black Lives Matter? The View from Twitter. The Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics, 4(2), 297-323. https://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2019.17 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2019.17
Toret, J. (coord.). (2013). Tecnopolítica: la potencia de las multitudes conectadas. UOC.
Treré, E. (2019). Hybrid Media Activism: Ecologies, Imaginaries, Algorithms. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315438177 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315438177
Tufecki, Z. (2014). Engineering the public: big data, surveillance and computational politics. First Monday, 19(7). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i7.4901 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i7.4901
Wainwright, J. (2007). Spaces of resistance in Seattle and Cancun. In: Leitner, H., Peck, J., & Sheppard, E. (Eds.) Contesting neoliberalism: Urban frontiers, 179-203 .Guilford Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 José Ignacio Candón Mena, David Montero Sánchez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Funding data
-
Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Grant numbers PID2020-113011RB-I00