Comunicación digital y la realidad social en la comunicación entre los usuarios de las redes sociales rusoparlantes: representación del contenido histórico

María  Pilgun; Iosif M Dzyaloshinsky

doi:10.4185/RLCS-2017-1205

Authors

María Pilgun University Higher School of Economics http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8948-7075
Iosif M Dzyaloshinsky University Higher School of Economics http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6000-1337

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2017-1205

Keywords:

social networking, contemporary content, the history of Russia, the October revolution of 1917

Abstract

This paper analyzes the content of social networks, devoted to historical events, in particular the October revolution of 1917. Objectives. The aim of this project is analysis of content devoted to historical events, to determine how the assessment of significant historical events affect the social reality, as reflected in virtual communication. Methodology. The main techniques that were used to obtain empirical data were used interdisciplinary approach, mass surveys, focus group interviews, analysis of content dedicated to the October revolution, harvested from social networks (Facebook, Vkontakte, Livejournal); analysis of essays. Data processing was carried out using Tableau software and Automap. Results. The content devoted to historical content in the Russian-speaking social networks, social tensions repeats of the events of 100 years ago. Discussion and Conclusion. The conflict that has split Russian society into hostile irreconcilable camps in 1917, continues to divide people today. The battlefield has shifted to virtual space, where the evaluation of historical events becomes another way of marking "friend or foe", leads to conflict communication and increase social tensions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

María Pilgun, University Higher School of Economics

Dr. in Philology, promoted 30 May 2000 at the subfaculty of Russian language, faculty of philology of the Kazan' State University/Russia.

Dissertation title: "The history of gender of the substantives in Russian language PhD in Philology, promoted 13 February 1992 at the subfaculty of Russian language, faculty of philology of the Kazan' State University/Russia. Dissertation title: "From the history of the substantives of neutrum gender in Russian language". 1987-1991 postgraduate courses, subfaculty of Russian language, faculty of philology of the Udmurt State University/Russia. 1981-1986 graduate study, faculty of philology, Kazan' State University/Russia.

POSITIONS: 2009 - professor of the Department of Integrating Communications, National ResearchUniversity Higher School of Economics. 2007 – 2009 - professor, head of the Subfaculty of Russian language of the Russian State Agrarian University – MTAA named after K.A.Timiryazev. 2001 - 2007 - professor, head of the Subfaculty of Russian language of the Moscow State Forestry University. December 1997 - head of the Subfaculty of Russian language of the Moscow State Forestry University. 1993 - 1997 - Assistant professor, subfaculty of Russian language, faculty of philology, Moscow State Forestry (Wood-working Industry) University. 1992 - 1993 Senior Lecturer, subfaculty of Russian language, faculty of philology, Moscow State Forestry (Wood-working Industry) University.

PUBLICATIONS: 210 scientific and methodical works published in Russia, Poland, Taiwan, Slovakia, Czech Republic, Spain, China and Bulgaria.

OTHER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: Elaboration of tests in Russian language (in the laboratory of attestation technologies at the department of education of Moscow government).

Iosif M Dzyaloshinsky, University Higher School of Economics

Doctor of Linguistics, professor, Department of Media, National Research University Higher School of Economics. Chair of Committee of Directors, Independent Institute for Communicology, President, Human Rights Foundation “Commission on Free Access to Information”, General Director, Institute for Humanitarian Communications. Authored more than 300 research papers.

References

Chong, D. & Druckman, J. N. (2007). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite enviroments. Journal of Communication, volume 57, 99-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00331.x

Druckman, J. N., Kifer, M. J. & Parkin, M. (2007). The technological development of Congressional candidate Web sites. Social Science Computer Review, 25(4), 425–442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0894439307305623 Gibson, et al., 2008, pp. 20/. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439307305623

Foot, K. A. & Schneider, S. M. (2006). Web campaigning. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7186.001.0001

Gibson, R. (2004). Web campaigning from a global perspective, Asia–Pacific Review, 11(1), 95–126. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13439000410001687779 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13439000410001687779

Kalnes, Ø. (2009). Norwegian parties and Web 2.0. Journal of Information Technology & Politics. 6(3), 251–266. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19331680903041845 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19331680903041845

Krippendorff, K. (2012). Content Analysis. An Introduction to Its Methodology. Third Edition. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012.

Larsson, А. О. (2011). Extended infomercials or Politics 2.0? A study of Swedish political party Web sites before, during and after the 2010 election. First Monday. 16(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v16i4.3456

Margolis, M., Resnick, D. & Levy, J. (2003). Major parties dominate, minor parties struggle. U.S. elections, and the Internet,” In: Gibson, R., Nixon, P. and Ward, S. (editors). Political parties and the Internet: Net gain? London: Routledge, 53–69.

Pepe, A. and di Gennaro, C.(2009). Political protest Italian–style: The blogosphere and mainstream media in the promotion and coverage of Beppe Grillo’s V–day, First Monday, 14(12) at https://firstmonday.org/article/view/2740, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v14i12.2740

Pilgun, M. A. & Dzyaloshinsky, I. M. (2016). Los fantasmas de la memoria histórica: Identidad social de la juventud rusa // Revista Latina de Comunicación Social. 71, pp 592-615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2016-1111

Stromer–Galley, J. (2000). On–line interaction and why candidates avoid it,” Journal of Communication, 50(4), pp. 111–132.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02865.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02865.x

Vaccari, C. (2008a). From the air to the ground: The Internet in the 2004 U.S. presidential campaign. New Media & Society, 10(4), 647–665. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1461444808093735 pp. 648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444808093735

Vaccari, C. (2008b). Research note: Italian parties’ Websites in the 2006 elections, European Journal of Communication, 23(1), 69–77. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0267323107085839 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323107085839

Vaccari, C. (2008c.) Surfing to the Elysee: The Internet in the 2007 French elections. French Politics, 6(1), 1–22. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/palgrave.fp.8200139 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.fp.8200139

White, D. M. & Marsh, E. E.(2006). Content analysis: a flexible methodology. Library trends, 1(55), 22–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2006.0053

Zittel, T. (2009). Lost in technology? Political parties and the online campaigns of constituency candidates in Germany’s mixed member electoral system. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 6(3), pp. 298–311. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19331680903048832 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19331680903048832

Пильгун, М. А. [Pilgun, M.A.] (2016). Репрезентация исторических событий в языковом сознании: 1917 год [Representación de acontecimientos históricos en la conciencia lingüística: año 1917.]. Вопросы психолингвистики. 2016, 3(29), 241– 259.

Пильгун М.А. & Дзялошинский И. М. [Pilgun, M.A. & Dzyloshinsky, I.M.] (2016). Интерпретация событий Октябрьской революции в языковом сознании современных пользователей: анализ контента [Interpretación de los acontecimientos de la Revolución de octubre en la conciencia lingüística de los usuarios modernos: análisis del contenido]. Вопросы психолингвистики. 2016. 4(30), 181-193.