Analysing the relation between disciplines using doctoral theses. The case of television, radio, cinema and photography in Spain

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2016-1125

Keywords:

Audiovisual Communication, Film, Television, Radio, Photography, Interdisciplinarity, Thesis

Abstract

This paper proposes a new method of analysing the relation between disciplines measuring academic participation in doctoral theses across different disciplines. Methodology: Doctoral theses and the relationships produced through the direction of theses and co-participation in doctoral thesis examination committees are used to construct the interdisciplinary relationships. This study uses doctoral theses defended in Spain in the field of audiovisual communication (television, radio, film and photography) for the period 1976-2007 as an example. Multidimensional scaling allows us to create a bi-dimensional representation of the specialties studied, calculate distances and quantify the degree of error of the representation. Results and Conclusions: The results demonstrate how two differing groups are produced, firstly television and radio and secondly film and photography. Television is the most representative specialty of the group; the different types of participation produce hardly any variations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Rafael Repiso, International University of La Rioja

Rafael Repiso. BA and PhD in Library and Information Science. Rafael Repiso, associate professor of UNIR (International University of La Rioja). Member of EC3 Research Group (University of Granada), and PROCOMM (UNIR) and group Comunicar.

Member of several scientific journals editorials such as Comunicar (associate editor), Icono 14 (associate editor), Razón y Palabra, Sophia, and Archivo Iberoamericano (editorial board member). His research deals with Scientific Documentation and Communication.

Creator of UNIR Ranking of Iberoamerican Advertising and coordinator of the Integrated Classification of Scientific Journals (CIRC). www.rafaelrepiso.com

Daniel Torres-Salinas, University of Navarra

Daniel Torres-Salinas. PhD in Library and Information Science from the University of Granada, works as a research technician at the Universities of Navarra and Granada.

It belongs as a researcher at EC3 Group (Evaluation of Science and Scientific Communication. Founding member and CEO of the Spin-off EC3metrics.

Co-author of several scientific products as Cientificacvn, Ranking I-UGR universities, Integrated Classification of Scientific Journals (CIRC , Bipublisher and UGRinvestiga. His research is the evaluation of the Scientific Communication. https://sites.google.com/site/torressalinas/

Emilio Delgado López-Cózar, University of Granada

Emilio Delgado López-Cózar. Degree in History and PhD in Library and Information Science from the University of Granada. University Professor, Department of Information and Communication, University of Granada.

Author of numerous articles on vocational training, standardization of scientific journals Spanish science assessment and bibliometric studies and methodologies.

Coauthor of several scientific products such as IN-RECS (Index of Scientific Journals Spanish), Cientifica, HIndex Scholar, Co-Author Index, RESH, Ranking I-UGR, integrated Scientific Journals Classification (CIRC), Publisher Scholar Metrics, Journals Scholar Metrics , etc. Founder of Spin Off EC3metrics of the University of Granada.

References

Bar-Ilan, J. (2006). An ego-centric citation analysis of the works of Michael O. Rabin based on multiple citation indexes. Information Processing & Management, 42(6), pp. 1553–1566. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2006.03.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2006.03.019

Bergmann, T., Dale, R., Sattari, N., Heit, E. & Bhat, S. (2016). The Interdisciplinarity of Collaborations in Cognitive Science. Cognitive Science, 1–7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12352 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12352

Bermejo-Berros, J. (2014). Evolución de los paradigmas, metodologías y campos de la comunicación en Revista Latina de Comunicación Social durante la década 2004-2013. Revista Latina de Comunicacion Social, 69, 330–353. https://dx.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2014-1014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2014-1014

Bjurström, A. & Polk, M. (2011). Climate change and interdisciplinarity: a co-citation analysis of IPCC Third Assessment Report. Scientometrics, 87(3), 525–550. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0356-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0356-3

Bourke, P. & Butler, L. (1998). Institutions and the map of science: matching university departments and fields of research. Research Policy, 26(6), 711–718. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00046-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00046-2

Boyack, K. W., Klavans, R. & Börner, K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64(3), 351–374. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0255-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0255-6

Casanueva Roche, C. & Espasandín Buestelo, F. (2007). Influencia de las relaciones sociales en el área de organización de empresas. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección Y Economía de La Empresa, 13(1), 39–56.

Delgado-López-Cózar, E., Torres-Salinas, D., Jiménez-Contreras, E. & Ruiz-Pérez, R. (2006). Análisis bibliométrico y de redes sociales aplicado a las tesis bibliométricas defendidas en España (1976-2002): temas, escuelas científicas y redes académicas. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 29(4), 493–524. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2006.v29.i4.306

Fruchterman, T. M. J. & Reingold, E. M. (1991). Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software: Practice and Experience, 21(11), 1129–1164. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/spe.4380211102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.4380211102

Fuentes Pujol, E. & Arguimbau Vivó, L. (2010). Las tesis doctorales en España (1997-2008): análisis, estadísticas y repositorios cooperativos. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 33(1), 63–89. https://redc.revistas.csic.es/index.php/redc/article/view/526/584 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2010.1.711

García García, F. (2000). Las ciencias de la comunicación y las ciencias de la UNESCO. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, (27), 4–7. Retrieved from: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/819/81932708.pdf

García, J. A., Rodríguez-Sánchez, R., Fdez-Valdivia, J., Robinson-García, N. & Torres-Salinas, D. (2012). Mapping academic institutions according to their journal publication profile: Spanish universities as a case study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(11), 2328–2340. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.22735 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22735

Kamada, T. & Kawai, S. (1988). A simple method for computing general position in displaying three-dimensional objects. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 41(1), 43–56. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0734-189X(88)90116-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0734-189X(88)90116-8

Kruskal, J. B. (1964). Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling: A Numerical Method. Psychometrika, (2), 115–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289694

Larsen, K. (2007). Interdisciplinarity in environmental technology applications - Examining knowledge interaction between physics and chemistry research teams. In: Torres-Salinas, D. & Moed, H. F. (Eds.), (pp. 463–468) Proceedings of ISSI 2007: 11th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics.

Leydesdorff, L. (2007a). Betweenness Centrality as an Indicator of the Interdisciplinarity of Scientific Journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 58(9), 1303–1319. https://bit.ly/3dp6fds DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20614

Leydesdorff, L. (2007b). Visualization of the citation impact environments of scientific journals: An online mapping exercise. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(1), 25–38. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20406 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20406

Leydesdorff, L. & Probst, C. (2009). The Delineation of an Interdisciplinary Specialty in Terms of a Journal Set : The Case of Communication Studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 60(c), 1709–1718. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/asi.21052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21052

Leydesdorff, L. & Rafols, I. (2009). A Global Map of Science Based on the ISI Subject. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 60(2), 348–362. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20967 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20967

Martínez Nicolás, M. & Saperas Lapiedra, E. (2011). La investigación sobre Comunicación en España (1998-2007). Análisis de los artículos publicados en revistas científicas. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 101–129. https://dx.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-66-2011-926-101-129 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-66-2011-926-101-129

Morillo, F., Bordons, M. & Gómez, I. (2003). Interdisciplinarity in science: A tentative typology of disciplines and research areas. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(13), 1237–1249. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.10326 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10326

Moya-Anegón, F., Vargas-Quesada, B., Herrero-Solana, V., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Corera-Álvarez, E. & Muñoz-Fernández, F. J. (2004). A new technique for building maps of large scientific domains based on the cocitation of classes and categories. Scientometrics, 61(1), 129–145. https://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000037368.31217.34 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000037368.31217.34

Porter, A. L. & Chubin, D. E. (1985). An indicator of cross-disciplinary research. Scientometrics, 8(3-4), 161–176. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02016934 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016934

Pudovkin, A. I. & Garfield, E. (2002). Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(13), 1113–1119. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.10153 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10153

Qin, J., Lancaster, F. W. & Allen, B. (1997). Types and levels of collaboration in interdisciplinary research in the sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(10), 893–916. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199710)48:10<893::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199710)48:10<893::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-X

Rafols, I. & Meyer, M. (2009). Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics, 82(2), 263–287. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0041-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0041-y

Repiso Caballero, R., Torres Salinas, D. & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2012). Análisis de la investigación sobre Radio en España: una aproximación a través del Análisis Bibliométrico y de Redes Sociales de las tesis doctorales defendidas en España entre 1976-2008. Estudios Sobre El Mensaje Periodístico, 17(2), 417–429. https://dx.doi.org/10.5209/rev_ESMP.2011.v17.n2.38123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_ESMP.2011.v17.n2.38123

Repiso, R. (2013). La investigación en Televisión, Cine, Radio y Fotografía en España: Análisis bibliométrico y de redes sociales de la estructura científica. Universidad de Granada.

Repiso, R., Torres, D. & Delgado, E. (2011). Bibliometric and social network analysis applied to television dissertations presented in Spain (1976/2007). Comunicar, 18(37), 151–159. https://dx.doi.org/10.3916/C37-2011-03-07 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3916/C37-2011-03-07

Repiso, R., Torres-Salinas, D. & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2013). La investigación científica sobre Cine en España a partir de sus tesis doctorales : Análisis de redes sociales (1978-2007). Icono 14, 11, 385–404. https://dx.doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v11i2.530 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v11i2.530

Russell, T. G. & Sugimoto, C. R. (2009). MPACT Family Trees : Quantifying Academic Genealogy in Library and Information Science. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 50(4), 248–262.

Scheu, M., Veefkind, V., Verbandt, Y., Galan, E. M., Absalom, R. & Förster, W. (2006). Mapping nanotechnology patents: The EPO approach. World Patent Information, 28(3), 204–211. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2006.03.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2006.03.005

Sugimoto, C. R. (2009). Mentoring, collaboration, and interdisciplinarity: an evaluation of the scholarly development of Information and Library Science doctoral students. University of North Carolina at Chapel.

Sugimoto, C. R., Ni, C. & Russell, T. G. (2011). Academic Genealogy as an Indicator of Interdisciplinarity : An Examination of Dissertation Networks in Library and Information Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(9), 1808–1828. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21568 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21568

Tomov, D. T. & Mutafov, H. G. (1996). Comparative indicators of interdisciplinarity in modern science. Scientometrics, 37(2), 267–278. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02093624 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02093624

Tsay, M. Y., Xu, H. & Wu, C. W. (2003). Author co-citation analysis of semiconductor literature. Scientometrics, 58(3), 529–545. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000006878.83104.61 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000006878.83104.61

Tur-Viñes, V., López-Sánchez, C., García del Castillo Rodríguez, J. A., López-Ornelas, M., Monserrat-Gauchi, J. & Quiles-Soler, M. C. (2014). Especialización y revistas académicas españolas de Comunicación. Revista Latina de Comunicacion Social, (69), 12–40. https://dx.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2014-999 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2014-999

Urata, H. (1990). Information flows among academic disciplines in Japan. Scientometrics, 18(3-4), 309–319. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02017767 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017767

Van Raan, A. F. J. (1999). The Interdisciplinary Nature of Science: Theoritcal Framework and Bibliometric-Empirical Approach. In: Weingart, P. & Stehr, N. (Eds.), Practising Interdisciplinarity (pp. 66–78). Toronto: University of Toronto Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442678729-006

White, H. D. (2001). Author-centered bibliometrics through CAMEOs : Characterizations automatically made and edited online. Scientometrics, 51(3), 607–637. https://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1019607522125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019607522125

White, H. D. & Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author Cocitation : A Literature Measure of Intellectual Structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3), 163–171. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630320302 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630320302

Xifra, J. & Castillo, A. (2006). Forty years of doctoral public relations research in Spain: A quantitative study of dissertation contribution to theory development. Public Relations Review, 32(3), 302–308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.05.004

Published

2016-09-14

How to Cite

Repiso, R. ., Torres-Salinas, D. ., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2016). Analysing the relation between disciplines using doctoral theses. The case of television, radio, cinema and photography in Spain. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, (71), 874–890. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2016-1125

Issue

Section

Miscellaneous