Presence and impact of Andean universities in online social networks

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2014-1025

Keywords:

Online research networks, social capital, rankings, reputation, scientific collaboration, invisible colleges

Abstract

This research study examines the presence and impact of the 165 universities that are part of the four Andean countries (Colombia, Peru, Ecuador and Bolivia) on the most important online research networks (Researchgate.net and Academia.edu), in order to establish the degree of use and penetration of these new tools that enable scientific communication, collaboration and interaction, and incorporate alternative scientific reputation evaluation systems that expand the traditional the visible and invisible colleges of science. Method. The study is based on quantitative and qualitative research techniques and social networks analysis (SNA). Results. The presence and impact of the Andean universities in the online research networks is heterogeneous, but generally emerging and growing, and still divergent in terms of reputation in comparison to the results achieved in other international university rankings of long-standing tradition. Discussion and conclusions. The online research networks and their techno-social tools (Web 2.0 and 3.0) are convergent digital ecosystems of software services, repositories and open and networked communication platforms that allow researchers: to share their academic and professional profile within a specific area of knowledge dissemination and exchange; to create lists of users related within one or more scientific disciplines in order to be able to monitor them, and share information contacts, projects, documents, notes, collaborations and research studies with them; to create scientific networks; to access and download references and scientific works available online; and to calculate and monitor the qualitative and quantitative value (scientific social capital), popularity and impact of their own and others’ citations, interactions and  publications. The results of the metrics used by these new research networks are moderately similar to those provided by the major university and scientific evaluation systems, but are still inadequate to measure research institutions in developing non-Anglo-Saxon countries. The challenge of the universities from developing countries and the new online research networks –launched after 2007– is to manage the efficiency and recognition of their scientific reputation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Francisco Campos Freire, University of Santiago de Compostela

Journalist and Professor of News and Audiovisual Media Business Management at the School of Sciences of Communication Sciences of the University of Santiago de Compostela (Spain). Francisco Campos Freire holds a BA degree in Information Sciences from the Complutense University of Madrid; an MBA degree in Industrial and Service Enterprises Management; and a PhD degree from the University of Santiago de Compostela. Professor recognised by Spain’s National Agency for Quality Assessment (ANECA) in 2011. European expert in Corporate Social Responsibility and Quality, certified by the European Organization for Quality (EOQ) and the Spanish Association for Quality (AEC).

In the journalistic profession he has worked as delegate of Lugo’s La Voz de Galicia regional newspaper (1979-1985); as Deputy director and Director of La región de Orense newspaper (1985-1990); as Managing Director of the Galician News Agency (AGN) (1990-94); as Director general of Galicia’s Radio and Television Corporation (1994 to 2005); and as President of the Spanish Federation of Regional Radio and Television Organisations (FORTA) in 1994, 1997, 2001 and 2004.

As academic, he has published nearly a hundred research articles and a dozen of books, including: Gestión de nuevas empresas periodísticas (“Management of new news media companies”, 2008); El cambio mediático (“The media change”, 2009); El nuevo escenario mediático (“The new media landscape”, 2010); Gobernanza y comunicación en Europa (“Governance and communication in Europe”, 2011); and La gestión e investigación de las redes sociales digitales (“Management and research of online social networks”), published in 2013 by Cuadernos Artesanos de Comunicación

Diana Rivera Rogel, Technical Particular University of Loja

Diana Rivera Rogel is a Full Professor of Print media at the Technical University of Loja (Ecuador). Holds a BA degree in Social communication from the Technical University of Loja (2006); and Specialisation degree (DEA) and a PhD degree in Communication and Journalism from the University Santiago de Compostela (Spain).

Director of the Department of Communication Sciences of the Technical University of Loja since May 2012. International co-editor of the scientific journal Comunicar.

She has participated in four funded research projects: 1) Historia de la comunicación de Ecuador. Prensa, radio, televisión, fotografía y medios digitales (“The history of communication in Ecuador. Press, radio, television, photography and digital media”); 2) Estudio del estado de la empresa periodística en Ecuador (”Study of the state of the journalistic enterprise in Ecuador”); 3) Mapa de la comunicación del Ecuador” (“Map of Ecuador’s media landscape”); and 4) Análisis de la agenda setting de los medios de comunicación televisivos, impresos y digitales de Ecuador (”Analysis of the agenda setting in Ecuador’s television, print and digital media”).

Selected by UNESCO and FELAFACS to teach the course on “Online and multimedia journalism for Andean countries”.

Claudia Rodríguez Hidalgo, Technical Particular University of Loja

Contents Editor at the Communication department of the Technical University of Loja (UTPL). Columnist and writer in the blog of the communication journal Comunicar.

She has participated in four research projects funded by the Technical University of Loja: Mapa de la comunicación del Ecuador” (“Map of Ecuador’s media landscape”); Historia de la comunicación de Ecuador. Prensa, radio, televisión, fotografía y medios digitales (“The history of communication in Ecuador. Press, radio, television, photography and digital media”); Análisis de la agenda setting de los medios de comunicación televisivos, impresos y digitales de Ecuador (”Analysis of the agenda setting in Ecuador’s television, print and digital media”); and Herramientas de la Web Semántica aplicadas a la comunicación Institucional (“Tools of the Semantic Web, applied to institutional communication”).

She is currently a student of the Master’s degree programme in Communication research of the University of Navarra.

References

Aladwani, A. M. (2014): “Gravitating towards Facebook (GoToFB): What it is? And How can it be measured?”. Computers in Human Behavior, 33(4), pp. 270-278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.005

Balagué, CH. y Fayon, D. (2012): Facebook, Twitter et les réseaux sociaux dans une stratégie d’entrepresse. Paris: Pearson

Bardon, A. (2011): “Top 20 des réseaux sociaux scientifiques”. Available at: http://www.knowtex.com/blog/le-top-20-des-reseaux-sociaux-scientifiques/

Barnes , J.(1954): “Class and committees in a Norwegian Island parish”. In Human Relations, 7, pp. 39-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700102

Benghozi, P. J. (2006): “Communaute virtuelle: structuration sociale ou outil de gestion?”. In: Entreprises et Histoires, 43, pp. 67-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/eh.043.0067

Benghozi, P. J. (2011): “Économie numérique et industries de contenu: un nouveau paradigme pour les résaux”. In Hermès, 59. Paris: CNRS. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4267/2042/45332

Bolter, J. D. y Grusin, R. (2000): Remediation. Understanding New Media. Cambridge: Mit Press.

Bordieu, P. (1993): Sociology in Question. London: Sage.

Bourdieu, P. (1986): “The Forms of Capital”. In: Richards, J. G. (ed), Handbook o Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. (pp. 241-258). Nueva York: Greenwood Press.

Bouquillion, P. y Matthews, J. T. (2010): Le Web collaborative: Mutations des industries de la culture et de la communication. Grenoble: PUG.

Boyd, D. M. y Ellison, N. B. (2007): “Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship”. In: Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), pp. 210-230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x

Burt, R. S. (1992): Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Butts, C. T., Carter, T. and Remy, C. B. (2009): “Change and External Events in Computer-Mediated Citation Networks: English Language Weblogs and the 2004 US Electoral Cycle”. In: Journal of Social Structure (JOSS), 10(3). http://www.cmu.edu/joss/content/

Crane, D. (1969): “Social Structure in a Group of Scientists: A Test of the “Invisible College” Hypothesis”. In: American Sociological Review, 34(3), American Sociological Society. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2092499

Crane, D. (1972): Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Carr, N. (2011): ¿Qué está haciendo Internet con nuestras mentes? Superficiales. Madrid: Taurus. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12795/AdMIRA.2011.01.11

Casilli, A. (2010): Les liaisons numériques. Vers une nouvelle sociabilité? Paris: Seuil.

Castells, M. (2009): Comunicación y poder. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

Charvolin, F., Micoud, A. y Nyhart, L. dir. (2007): Des sciencies citoyennes? La Tour d’Aigues, Éditions de l’Aube

Chéreau, M. (2010): Community management. Comment faire des communautés web les meilleures alliées des marques. Paris: Dunod.

Christakis, N. A. and Fowler, J. H. (2010): Conectados. El sorprendente poder de las redes sociales y cómo nos afectan. Madrid: Taurus.

Coleman, J. S. (1990): “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital”. In: American Journal of Sociology, 94, pp. 95-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/228943

Degenne, A. (2011): “Retour à l’analyse des réseaux sociaux (entretien)”. In: Hermès, 59, pp. 39-40. Paris: CNRS. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/herm.059.0039

Dekker, A. (2005): “Conceptual Distance in Social Network Analysis”. In: Journal of Social Structure (JOSS), 6(3), https://www.cmu.edu/joss/content/articles/volume6/dekker/

Dekker, A. (2008): “The Eurovision Song Contest as a Friendship Network”. In: Connections, 28(1), pp. 59-72. www.insna.org/connections

de Pablos Coello, J. M., Mateos Martín, C. y Túñez López, M. (2013): “Google cambia el paradigma de la métrica científica”. In: Historia y Comunicación Social, 18, special issue. December, (pp. 225-235). ISSN: 1137-0734. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/rev_HICS.2013.v18.44327 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_HICS.2013.v18.44327

Ellison, N. B. (2011): “Réseaux Sociaux, numérique et capital social (entretien)”. By Thomas Stenger y Alexandre Coutant. En Hermès, 59, pp. 21-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/herm.059.0019

Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, CH. and Lampe, C. (2011): “Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices”. In: New Media&Society, 13(6), Sage Pub. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810385389

Ellison, N. and Boyd, D. (2013): “Sociality through Social Network Sites.” In: The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies (ed. William H. Dutton). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199589074.013.0008

Fayon, D. (2010): Web 2.0 et au-delà : Nouveaux internautes : du surfeur à l’acteur. Paris: Económica

Fillias, E. y Villeneuve, A. (2011): E-Réputation. Stratégies d’influence sur Internet. Paris: Ellipses

Flichy, P. (2010): Le sacre de l’amateur. Sociologie des passions ordinaires à l’ère numérique. Paris: Seuil

Freeman, L. C. (2012): El desarrollo del análisis de redes sociales. Un estudio de sociología de la ciencia. Bloomington: Palibro

García-Valdecasas Medina, J. I. (2011): “Una definición estructural del capital social”. In: Redes, 20(6), Barcelona. http://revista-redes.rediris.es DOI: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/redes.411

Gómez, T. and Puente, X. (2013): “Rankings y reputación universitaria”. Universidad de La Rioja (España): XXIV Jornadas Formativas de la Asociación de Profesionales de Gabinetes de Comunicación de las Universidades Españolas y Centros de Investigación (AUGAC), held on 17 and 18 October, includes the paper: “El valor de los rankings universitarios”. Available at: http://asus.usal.es/tomas-Goméz-y-xavier-puente/22317-alias (retrieved on 10/2/2014).

Gutiérrez-Rubí, A. y Freire, J. (2013): Manifiesto Crowd. La empresa y la inteligencia de las multitudes. Madrid: Laboratorio de Tendencias.

Granovetter, M. S. (1974): Getting a Job: a study of contacts and careers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press

Hallam, J. (2012): The Social Media Manifesto. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137271426

Haas, P. M. (1992): “Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination”. International Organization, 46(1), pp. 1-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300001442

Jenkins, H. (2009): Fans, blogueros y videojuegos: la cultura de la colaboración. Barcelona: Paidós

Jenkins, H. (2010): Piratas de textos: fans, cultura participativa y televisión. Barcelona: Paidós

Lanier, J. (2011): Contra el rebaño digital. Barcelona: Madrid

Lazega, E. (1998): Réseaux sociaux et structures relationnelles. Paris: PUF.

Lèvy, P. (2004): La inteligencia colectiva. Por una organización del ciberespacio. Washington: Organización Panamericana de la Salud (ed. PDF)

Lin, N. (2001): Social Capital: a theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815447

López García, X., Gago, M. and Toural, C. (2014): “La encrucijada de la divulgación científica: tiempo real y portabilidad de conceptos”. Available at: www.academia.edu [retrieved on 25/06/2014].

Mattelart, A. (1998): La mundialización de la comunicación. Barcelona: Paidós.

Mattelart, A. (2007): Historia de la sociedad de la información. Barcelona: Paidós.

Mercklé, P. (2011): Sociologie des réseaux sociaux. Paris: La Découverte. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/dec.merck.2011.01

Molina, J. L. (2004): “La ciencia de las redes”. In: Apuntes de Ciencia y Tecnología”, 11

Moreno, J. L. y Jennings, H. H. (1934): Who Shall Survive: A new approach to the problem of human. Washington: Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10648-000

Morín, E. (1994): Introducción al pensamiento complejo. Barcelona: Gedisa

Nafría, I. (2007): Web 2.0. El usuario, el nuevo rey de Internet. Barcelona: Gestión 2000

Nicolás Ojeda, M. A. y Grandío Pérez, M. M. coord. (2012): Estrategias de comunicación en redes sociales. Usuarios, aplicaciones y contenidos. Barcelona: Gedisa

Noguera Vivo, J. M., Martínez Polo, J. y Grandío Pérez, M. M. (2011): Redes Sociales para estudiantes de Comunicación. Barcelona: UOC.

Noguera, J. M. (2012): Redes y Periodismo. Barcelona: UOC

Orihuela, J. L. (2011): Mundo Twitter. Barcelona: Alienta

O’Reilly, T. (2005): “Web 2.0. Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software”. In: http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html.

Parra, P., Gordo, A. J. y D’Antonio, S. A. (2014): “La investigación social aplicada en redes sociales. Una innovación metodológica para el análisis de los «Me gusta» en Facebook”. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 69, pp. 195-212. https://dx.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2014-1008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2014-1008

Poncier, A. (2011): Les réseaux sociaux d’entreprise. Paris: Diateino

Proulx, T. and Heine, S. J. (2009): “Connections from Kafka. Exposure to meaning threats improves implicit learning of an artificial grammar”. In: Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(2), pp. 88-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02414.x

Putnam, R. (1993): “The prosperous community: social capital and public life”. In: The American Prospect, 13.

Requena Santos, F. (2003, 2012): Análisis de redes sociales. Orígenes, teorías y aplicaciones. Madrid: CIS

Requena Santos, F. (2011): Las redes de apoyo social. Madrid: Thomson Reuters

Researchgate (2014): The RG Score is a metric that measures scientific reputation based on how all of your research is received by your peers. https://www.researchgate.net/RGScore/FAQ/

Rheingold, H. (1993, 2000): The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7105.001.0001

Rheingold, H. (2004): Multitudes inteligentes. La próxima revolución social. Barcelona: Gedisa

Rifkin, J. (2013): La era del acceso. La revolución de la comunicación

Stenger, T. y Coutant, A. (2011): “Introduction. Ces réseaux numériques dits sociaux”. In: Hermès, 59, pp. 9-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/herm.059.0009

Stenger, T. (2009): “Social Network Sites (SNS): do they match? Definitions and methods for social sciences and marketing research”. In: XXIX Conferencia INSNA (San Diego, USA). Available at: https://bit.ly/39mLHQa

Solla Price, D. J. (1986): Little science, big science and beyond. Nueva York: Columbia University Press.

Surowiecki, J. (2004). The Wisdom of Crowds. N. York: Random House.

Tapscott, D. y Williams, A. D. (2007): Wikinomics. La nueva economía de las multitudes inteligentes. Barcelona: Paidós.

Tello, N. and de la Peña, J. A. (2013): “Modelos matemáticos de la sociedad y aplicaciones. Crecimiento de las redes sociales”. In: Redes, 24(1), Barcelona. http://revista-redes.rediris.es DOI: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/redes.248

Thelwall, M. y Kousha, K. (2014): “ResearchGate: Disseminating, communicating, and measuring Scholarship”. Retrieved from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23236. Preprint of the article published in Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, John Wiley & Sons, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23236

Thelwall, M. and Kousha, K. (2013): “Academia.edu: Social network or Academic Network?”. In Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(4), pp. 721-731. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23038

Tausch, A. (2014): “Researchgate, RG-Scores, or a true Research Gate to Global Research? On the limits of the RG factor and some scientometric evidence on how the current RG score system discriminates against economic and social sciences and against the developing countries”. www.academia.edu. Retrieved on 10/07/2014 from: https://bit.ly/3EDXCY9

Túñez López, M. (2013): “El índice h de la investigación en Comunicación en España, Portugal y Latinoamérica: Web of Knowledge (Wok), Scopus y Google Scholar”. In: Coomunication&Society/Comunicación y Sociedad, 4, pp. 53-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15581/003.26.36060

Watts, D. J. (2006): Seis grados de separación. La ciencia de las redes en la era del acceso. Barcelona: Paidós.

Wagner, C. S. (2009): The new invisible college: Science for development. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.

Wenger, E. (1998): Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932

Wolton, D. (2006): Salvemos la comunicación. Aldea global y cultura. Una defensa de los ideales democráticos y la cohabitación mundial. Barcelona: Gedisa.

Wolton, D. (2011): “Ces réseaux numériques dits sociaux”, In Hermès, 59. Paris: CNRS

Published

2014-09-15

How to Cite

Campos Freire, F., Rivera Rogel, D. ., & Rodríguez Hidalgo, C. . (2014). Presence and impact of Andean universities in online social networks. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, (69), 571–592. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2014-1025

Issue

Section

Miscellaneous