Scientific field of Communication: examining its intellectual structure through cocitation analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2010-893-204-213Keywords:
scientific field of communication, citation analysis, author cocitation analysis (ACA), documents cocitation analysis, journal cocitation analysis, intellectual structureAbstract
Presents the results obtained in the analysis of Communication as a scientific field from a metric point of view. The research was conducted from the use of bibliometric techniques and visualization tools, through which they tried to reveal the intellectual structure of the field in question, shown in published studies between 2000 and 2007 in the mainstream international journals that comprise the Web of Science. Considering the source analyzed it was found that Communication is an area of interdisciplinary knowledge characterized by epistemological legitimacy still insufficient, with a marked absence of reflections and theoretical proposals themselves from the field and that its structure is divided into two intelectutal well-defined subdisciplines: Interpersonal Communication and Mass Communication, crossed transversely by New Technologies.
Downloads
References
Burnham, J. (2006). "Scopus database: A review." recuperado el 17 de marzo, de 2009, de http://www.bio-diglib.com/content/3/1/1
Colle, Raymond (2009): La temática de Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 1998-2008. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 64, páginas 71 a 85. La Laguna (Tenerife): Universidad de La Laguna, recuperado el 26 de octubre de 2009, de http://www.revistalatinacs.org/09/art/07_806_13_revista/Raymond_Colle.html
Deis, L. and D. Goodman (2005). "Web of Science (2004 version) and Scopus." Recuperado el 17 de marzo de 2009, de http://www.charlestonco.com/comp.cfm?id=43.
Jacso, P. (2004). "Péter's Digital Reference Shelf. Scopus." recuperado el 24 noviembre, 2008, de http://www.galegroup.com/reference/archive/200409/scopus.html.
LaGuardia, C. (2005). "E-Views and Reviews: Scopus vs Web of Science." reuperado el 23 de noviembre de 2008, de http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA491154.html
Leydesdorff, L. and C. Probst (2009). The Delineation of an Interdisciplinary Specialty in terms of a Journal Set: The Case of Communication Studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology (forthcoming)
Martínez Nicolás, M. (2009): "La investigación sobre comunicación en España. Evolución histórica y retos actuales", publicado en Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 64, páginas 1 a 14. La Laguna (Tenerife): Universidad de La Laguna, recuperado el 26 de octubre de 2009, de http://www.revistalatinacs.org/09/art/01_800_01_investigacion/Manuel_Martinez_Nicolas.html
McCain, K. W. (1990). "Mapping Economics through the Journal Literature: An Experiment in Journal Cocitation Analysis." Journal of the American Society for Information Science 42(4), 290-296.
Moya-Anegón, F. et al. (2007). "Coverage analysis of Scopus: A journal metric approach." Scientometrics 73(1), 53-78.
Park, H. W. and Leydesdorff, L. (2009). Korean journals in the Science Citation Index: What do they reveal about the intellectual structure of S&T in Korea? Scientometrics 75(3), 439-462.
Vargas Quesada, B. (2005). Visualización y aAnálisis de dominios científicos mediante redes pathfinder (PFNET). Biblioteconomía y Documentación. Granada, España, Universidad de Granada. Tesis doctoral.
White, H. and McCain, K. (1998). "Visualizing a Discipline: An Author Co-Citation: Analysis of Information Science, 1972-1995." Journal of the American Society for Information Science 49(4), 327-355.
White, H. and B. C. Griffth (1981). "Author co-citation: a literature measure of intellectual structure". Journal of the American Society for Information Science 32(3), 163-171