Factors favoring digital engagement of science communicators in Tiktok

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4185/rlcs-2024-2232

Keywords:

Science communication, Science dissemination, Science outreach, Digital engagement, Engagement, Interaction, Educational Innovation

Abstract

Introduction: Science dissemination seeks to involve the public in science and stimulate discussion on scientific topics. This practice has spread in recent years thanks to the rise of social networks. Among these networks, Tiktok has become a medium for science literacy, particularly among a young audience. Methodology: The objective of this research was to describe the characteristics of the content associated with engagement in Spanish-speaking science communicators through TikTok. We analyzed the content (videos) of 10 popularizers who use a TikTok account to disseminate their content. The format, type and content of 94 videos shared by these popularizers between August and December 2022 were analyzed.  Results: It was found that some of the characteristics related to higher engagement were: video length (>60 seconds), number of hashtags (between 5 and 10), use of animated infographics, news presentation, adherence to the stated mission (typically disseminating science) and not making videos for advertising purposes. Discussion: Although the study of digital engagement in social networks is not new, the particular case of science communicators in social networks is still a new field. Conclusions: The results of this study can be important inputs to help science communicators improve their level of engagement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Davis Velarde-Camaqui, Tecnologico de Monterrey

PhD student in Educational Innovation at Tecnológico de Monterrey. His research focus is directed to educational innovation through the application of Augmented Reality, as well as the support and dissemination of Science. He has taught at different universities in Peru. Expert in psychometrics, as well as undergraduate thesis advisor.

a00832505@tec.mx

Índice H: 1

Orcid ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9064-7104

Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=oZmFEYYAAAAJ&hl=es&oi=ao

ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Davis-Velarde-Camaqui

Academia.edu: https://cinco-itesm.academia.edu/DavisVelardeCamaqui

Cristina Viehmann, Tecnológico de Monterrey

PhD student in Educational Innovation at Tecnológico de Monterrey. Her research focus is socio-scientific controversies and the use of futures thinking in science education. She has taught at the Monterrey Center for Higher Studies in Design (CEDIM) and the University of Monterrey (UDEM). She is an expert in foresight and strategic innovation.

a00807496@tec.mx

Orcid ID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2716-6729

ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Cristina-Viehmann-2

Academia.edu: https://independent.academia.edu/CristinaViehmann

Rosa Díaz, Tecnológico de Monterrey

Master in Clinical Nutrition. Doctoral candidate in Educational Innovation at the Tecnológico de Monterrey. Research interests: teaching-learning processes in health sciences and scientific dissemination.

a00832504@tec.mx

Índice H: 1

Orcid ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9964-7415

Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.es/citations?user=XMDI44IAAAAJ&hl=es&oi=ao

Gabriel Valerio-Ureña, Tecnológico de Monterrey

He holds a PhD in Educational Innovation, he is a computer systems engineer and has a Master's degree in Information Technology Management. He has 22 years of experience as a research professor at Tecnológico de Monterrey, where he was also a consultant in knowledge management for 10 years and is a member of the National System of Researchers. He is the director of the Doctorate in Educational Innovation at Tecnológico de Monterrey. His line of research revolves around the impact of digital tools in education and business.

gvalerio@tec.mx

Índice H: 15

Orcid ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9964-7415

Scopus ID: https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57211556602

Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.es/citations?user=XMDI44IAAAAJ&hl=es&oi=ao

ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Gabriel-Valerio

Academia.edu: https://itesm.academia.edu/GabrielValerio

 

References

Beautemps, J. y Bresges, A. (2021). What Comprises a Successful Educational Science YouTube Video? A Five-Thousand User Survey on Viewing Behaviors and Self-Perceived Importance of Various Variables Controlled by Content Creators. Frontiers in Communication, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.600595

Brossard, D. y Scheufele, D. A. (2013). Science, New Media, and the Public. Science, 339(6115), 40-41. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1232329

Cambridge University Press (s.f.). Engagement. Cambridge dictionary. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/engagement

Cervi, L. y Marín-Lladó, C. (2021). What are political parties doing on TikTok? The Spanish case. El Profesional de la Información. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.jul.03

Chang, H.-C. (2010). A new perspective on Twitter hashtag use: Diffusion of innovation theory. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14504701295

Chen, Q., Min, C., Zhang, W., Ma, X. y Evans, R. (2021). Factors Driving Citizen Engagement with Government TikTok Accounts During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Model Development and Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(2), e21463. https://doi.org/10.2196/21463

Escamilla-Fajardo, P., Alguacil, M. y López-Carril, S. (2021). Incorporating TikTok in higher education: Pedagogical perspectives from a corporal expression sport sciences course. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2021.100302

Habibi, S. A. y Salim, L. (2021). Static vs. dynamic methods of delivery for science communication: A critical analysis of user engagement with science on social media. PLOS ONE, 16(3), e0248507. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248507

Hayes, C., Stott, K., Lamb, K. J. y Hurst, G. A. (2020). “Making Every Second Count”: Utilizing TikTok and Systems Thinking to Facilitate Scientific Public Engagement and Contextualization of Chemistry at Home. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(10), 3858-3866. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00511

Heldman, A. B., Schindelar, J. y Weaver, J. B. (2013). Social Media Engagement and Public Health Communication: Implications for Public Health Organizations Being Truly “Social.” Public Health Reviews, 35(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391698

Hernández-Sampieri, R. y Mendoza, C. (2018). Metodología de la Investigación: Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta.

Hodson, D. (2020). Going Beyond STS Education: Building a Curriculum for Sociopolitical Activism. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 20(4), 592-622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-020-00114-6

Hutchinson, A. (2022). TikTok Confirms that 10 Minute video Uploads are Coming to All Users. Social Media Today. https://acortar.link/cntT48

Hwong, Y.-L., Oliver, C., Van Kranendonk, M., Sammut, C. y Seroussi, Y. (2017). What makes you tick? The psychology of social media engagement in space science communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 480-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.068

Laurel, B. (1993). Computers as theatre.

Li, Y., Guan, M., Hammond, P. y Berrey, L. E. (2021). Communicating COVID-19 information on TikTok: a content analysis of TikTok videos from official accounts featured in the COVID-19 information hub. Health Education Research, 36(3), 261-271. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyab010

López-Navarrete, A.-J., Cabrera-Méndez, M., Díez-Somavilla, R. y Calduch-Losa, Á. (2021). Fórmula para medir el engagement del espectador en YouTube: investigación exploratoria sobre los principales youtubers españoles. Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación, 12(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM000013

Medina-Serrano, J. C., Papakyriakopoulos, O. y Hegelich, S. (2020). Dancing to the Partisan Beat: A First Analysis of Political Communication on TikTok. 12th ACM Conference on Web Science, 257-266. https://doi.org/10.1145/3394231.3397916

Muñoz, M. M., Rojas-de-Gracia, M.-M. y Navas-Sarasola, C. (2022). Measuring engagement on twitter using a composite index: An application to social media influencers. Journal of Informetrics, 16(4), 101323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2022.101323

Nelson, M. R., Wood, M. L. M. y Paek, H.-J. (2009). Increased Persuasion Knowledge of Video News Releases: Audience Beliefs About News and Support for Source Disclosure. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 24(4), 220-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/08900520903332626

Pattier, D. (2022). Enseñando matemáticas a través de YouTube: El caso de los edutubers españoles. Digital Education Review, 42, 65-80. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2022.42.65-80

Perego, E., Del Missier, F., Porta, M. y Mosconi, M. (2010). The Cognitive Effectiveness of Subtitle Processing. Media Psychology, 13(3), 243-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2010.502873

Perez, S. (2023). Kids and teens spend more time on TikTok than YouTube. TechCrunch.

Small, T. A. (2011). What the hashtag? Information, Communication & Society, 14(6), 872-895. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.554572

Statista. (2023). Social medias news source. https://www.statista.com/statistics/718019/social-media-news-source/

Statista Research Department (2022). Distribution of TikTok users in the United States as of September 2021, by age group.

Tashakkori, A., Johnson, R. B. y Teddlie, C. (2020). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Sage Publications.

Taylor, C. R. (2017). Native Advertising: The Black Sheep of the Marketing Family. International Journal of Advertising, 36(2), 207-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2017.1285389

TikTok. (2021, September). Thanks a billion!” TikTok Newsroom. https://acortar.link/cbyKTb

TikTok. (2022). Acerca de TikTok. https://www.tiktok.com/about?lang=es

Valerio, G., Herrera, N., Herrera, D. y Rodríguez, M. (2014). En Facebook el tamaño sí importa. Engagement y el impacto de la longitud del mensaje en las fanpages de las universidades mexicanas. Revista Digital Universitaria. UNAM.

Weingart, P. y Guenther, L. (2016). Science communication and the issue of trust. Journal of Science Communication, 15(05). https://doi.org/10.22323/2.15050301

Zawacki, E. E., Bohon, W., Johnson, S. y Charlevoix, D. J. (2022). Exploring TikTok as an effective platform for geoscience communication. EGUsphere.

Zeng, J., Schäfer, M. S. y Allgaier, J. (2020). Reposting “till Albert Einstein is TikTok famous”: the memetic construction of science on TikTok. International Journal of Communication, 15.

Zhu, C., Xu, X., Zhang, W., Chen, J. y Evans, R. (2019). How Health Communication via Tik Tok Makes a Difference: A Content Analysis of Tik Tok Accounts Run by Chinese Provincial Health Committees. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(1), 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010192

Artículos relacionados

Acuña-Hormazábal, A., Ganga-Contreras, F., Castillo, J. y Luengo-Martínez, C. (2022). Investigaciones sobre Engagement y Burnout: una aproximación teórica en tiempos de COVID-19. Telos: revista de Estudios Interdisciplinarios en Ciencias Sociales, 24(2), 370-383. https://doi.org/10.36390/telos242.10

Arrufat Martín, S. (2021). Los medios de comunicación españoles en tiempos de pandemia: generación de noticias en redes sociales durante la COVID-19. Vivat Academia, Revista de Comunicación, 154, 107-122. https://doi.org/10.15178/va.2021.154.e1309

Conde del Rio, M. A. (2021). Estructura mediática de Tiktok: estudio de caso de la red social de los más jóvenes. Revista de Ciencias de la Comunicación e Información, 26, 59-77. https://doi.org/10.35742/rcci.2021.26.e126

Micaletto-Belda, J. P., Martín-Ramallal, P. y Merino-Cajaraville, A. (2022). Contenidos digitales en la era de tiktok: percepción de los usuarios del botón COVID-19 en España. Revista de Comunicación y Salud, 12, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.35669/rcys.2022.12.e290

Muñoz Gallego, A., De Sousa Lacerda, J. y Costa Araujo, A. C. (2023). La divulgación científica en instagram: el reto del discurso audiovisual científico ante los contenidos efímeros. Revista de Comunicación de la SEECI, 56, 148-175. https://doi.org/10.15198/seeci.2023.56.e823

Published

2024-02-28

How to Cite

Velarde-Camaqui, Davis, Cristina Viehmann, Rosa Díaz, and Gabriel Valerio-Ureña. 2024. “Factors favoring digital engagement of science communicators in Tiktok”. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, no. 82 (February):1-18. https://doi.org/10.4185/rlcs-2024-2232.

Issue

Section

Miscellaneous

Most read articles by the same author(s)