Testing inclusive interdisciplinary models on Internet dependence in Youth. New associated variables
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2016-1112Keywords:
Communication, interdisciplinary, Mexico, dependency, InternetAbstract
This article analyzes and discusses when and why the integration testing of an inclusive interdisciplinary model to explain and predict the variable dependence on Internet in the Interactive Generation (IG). Methodology: Presents results on a sample of 4,563 young Mexicans and exposes the validity of test constructs and the relevance and consistency of the data and its explanatory relationship using a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) of multiple regressions. Results and conclusions: The relationship between factors guided by the theory is established to check the validity of disciplinary theoretical constructs that nourish both restrictive interdisciplinary models as the inclusive interdisciplinary model. Consequently, discussed, refined and articulate new research questions and unpublished relations between theory and practice through the generation of new associated variables are set.
Downloads
References
Bechtel, R. B., Marans, R. & Michelson, W. (1990): "Methods in environmental and behavioral research". Malabar, FLA: Krieger.
Berger, P. & Luckman, T. (1983): "La construcción social de la realidad". Buenos Aires: Amorrortu
Berger, T. (1997): "Observation and Analysis of Small-scale Solar Magnetic Structure". (PhD thesis), Stanford University, California, USA
Block, J. (2008): “Issues for DSM-V: Internet Addiction”. Am J Psychiatry 2008, (16)5, pp. 306-307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07101556
Bringué, X., Sádaba, C. y Rodríguez, J. (2008): "La Generación Interactiva frente a un nuevo escenario de comunicación: Retos sociales y educativos". Navarra: Consejo Audiovisual de Navarra.
Cao, F., Su, L., Liu, T. & Gao, X. (2007). “The relationship between impulsivity and Internet addiction in a sample of Chinese adolescents”. Eur Psychiatry 22, pp. 466-471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2007.05.004
Craig, R. Y Tracy, K. (2014): "Building Grounded Practical Theory in Applied Communication Research: Introduction to the Special Issue." Journal of Applied Communication Research, 42(3), pp. 229-243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2014.916410
Klein, J. (2013): “The State of the Field: Institutionalization of Interdisciplinarity”. Issues in Integrative Studies, (31), pp. 76-74.
León-Duarte, G. (2015): Transformaciones en el campo de estudios de la Comunicación en América Latina. Perspectivas epistemológicas y éticas en torno a la generación, la apropiación y la divulgación del conocimiento. Conferencia Magistral. FELAFACS 2015. Medellín, Colombia, 7 de octubre de 2015. Federación Latinoamericana de Facultades de Comunicación Social-Universidad de Antioquia.
León-Duarte, G., Castillo, E., Montes, M. y Caudillo, D. (2013): Relaciones interactivas, Internet y jóvenes de secundaria en México. Primera oleada sobre usos, consumos, competencias, y navegación segura de Internet en Sonora. Hermosillo: Qartuppi Editores -Universidad de Sonora.
León-Duarte, G., Caudillo, D., Contreras, R. y Moreno, D. (2014): Jóvenes de Secundaria e Internet Seguro en México. Hermosillo: Qartuppi Editores -Universidad de Sonora.
León-Duarte, G., Caudillo, D., Contreras, R. y Moreno, D. (2015): Jóvenes y medios digitales móviles en México. Un estudio de variables asociadas en perspectiva interdisciplinar. México: PEARSON EDUCACIÓN - Universidad de Sonora.
Meek, J. (2001): “The practice of interdisciplinarity: Complex conditions and the potential of interdisciplinary theory”. Issues in Integrative Studies, (19), pp. 123-132.
Newell, W. (2013): “The State of the Field: Interdisciplinary Theory”. Issues in Integrative Studies, (31), pp. 22-43.
Nunally, J. & Bernstein, I. (1994): Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Patry, J. (2013): “Beyond multiple methods: Critical multiplism on all levels”. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 7(1), pp. 50-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.2013.7.1.50
Repko, A. (2008): "Interdisciplinary Research. Process and Theory". Sage: California.
Shadish, W. (1986): “The person‐situation debate: A critical multiplist perspective”. Journal of Personality, 54(1), 52-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1986.tb00390.x
Shadish, W. (1993): “Critical multiplism: A research strategy and its attendant tactics”. New directions for program evaluation, (60), pp. 13-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1660
Silbereisen, R., Ritchie, P. y Overmier, B. (2010): “Psychology at the vortex of convergence and divergence: The case of social change”. ISSC and UNESCO, World Social Science Report, pp. 213-217.
Szostak, R. (2013): “The State of the Field: Interdisciplinary Research”. Issues in Integrative Studies, (31), pp. 44–65.