The filmic emotion. A comparative analysis of the cinematographic theories
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4185/10.4185/RLCS-66-2011-936-326-349Keywords:
filmic emotion, Psychoanalysis, cognitivism, Cultural Studies, reception theory, structural semioticAbstract
This text tries to explain the bases of filmic emotion. As we don’t share one same idea about the way the filmic texts play with the emotional world of the empiric spectator, the next pages look deep in the large kind of arguments and approaches through which filmic theory has tried to explain the catalog of emotions that a film raises in its spectator. This account reveals that one conflict exists between lector and context–oriented theories and these that looks directly to the text. We can choose, in fact, between two approaches in order to evaluate the emotional effects raised by the films. One, the Cultural Studies approach is based on pragmatics and gender oriented theories, focusing on social and subjective conditions through which cinema is always experienced. The other one, mostly oriented by a structural, cognitive and semiotic approach looks deep in the way the filmic text directs the spectatorial approach. In a no man’s land we can find the psychoanalytical theory thinking the filmic experience just as a simulation of daily life.
Downloads
References
Anderson, J. D. (1996): The Reality of Illusion: An Ecological Approach to Cognitive Film Theory. Illinois: Southern Illinois University Press.
Averril, J. R. (1980): “A Constructivist View of Emotion”. En VV AA, Emotion: Theory, Research, and Experience, 1 (Eds. R. Plutchik y H. Kellerman). New York: Academic Press, pp. 305-339.
Baudry, J. L. (1975): “Le dispositif: approches métapsychologiques de l’impression de réalité”. Communications 23, pp. 56-72.
Bobo, J. (1995): Black Women as Cultural Readers. New York: Columbia University Press.
Bordwell, D. (1995): El significado del filme. Inferencia y retórica en la interpretación cinematográfica. Barcelona: Paidós.
Bordwell, D. (1996): La narración en el cine de ficción. Barcelona: Paidós.
Bordwell, D. y Thompson, K. (2003): El arte cinematográfico (sexta edición). México: McGraw-Hill.
Burch, N. (1985): Praxis del cine. Barcelona: Fundamentos.
Carrol, N. (1990): The Philosophy of Horror, or the Paradoxes of the Heart. New York: Routdledge.
Carrol, N. (1999): “Film, Emotion, and Genre”. En VV AA, Passionate Views. Film, Cognition, and Emotion (Eds., C. Plantinga y G. M. Smith). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 21-47.
Culler, J. (1982): Sobre la deconstrucción. Madrid: Cátedra.
Danto, A. C. (2005): El abuso de la belleza. La estética y el concepto del arte. Barcelona: Paidós.
Eco, U. (1987): Lector in fabula. La cooperación interpretativa en el texto narrativo. Barcelona: Lumen.
Eco, U. (2000): Los límites de la interpretación. Madrid: Lumen.
Fish, S. (1980): Is there a Text in This Class? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Grodal, T. (1997): Moving Pictures: A New Theory of Film Genres, Feeling and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Liebes, T. y Katz, E. (1991): Export of Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Metz, C. (1977): Signifiant imaginaire, psychanalyse et cinéma. Paris: Union Generale d’Editions, coll 10/18 (la primera traducción al castellano fue 1979: Psicoanálisis y cine. El significante imaginario. Barcelona: Gustavo Gilli).
Morin, E. (1958): Le Cinéma ou l’homme imaginaire: essai d’anthropologie, Paris, Minuit, 1958 (una traducción al castellano está disponible en1972: El cine o el hombre imaginario. Barcelona: Seix Barral).
Mulvey, L. (1975): “Visual Pleasures and Narrative Cinema”, Screen 16, nº 3 (una versión en castellano está disponible en 1988: Placer visual y cine narrativo. Valencia: Documentos de Trabajo, nº 1, Centro de semiótica y Teoría del Espectáculo).
Pinker, S. (2007): Cómo funciona la mente. Barcelona: Destino.
Plantinga, C. y Smith, G. M. (1999): “Introduction”. En VV AA, Passionate Views. Film, Cognition, and Emotion (Eds., C. Plantinga y G. M. Smith). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 1-17.
Plutchik, R. (1980): Emotion: Theory, research and experiencie, 1. Theories of emotion. New York: Academia.
Schachter, S. y Singer, J. (1962): “Cognitive , Social and Psysiological Determinants of Emotional State”. Phychological Review, 69, pp. 379-399.
Shohat, E. y Stam, R. (2002): Multiculturalismo, cine y medios de comunicación. Crítica del pensamiento eurocéntrico. Barcelona: Paidós.
Smith, G. M. (2003): Film Structure and the Emotion System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, M. (1995): Engaging Characters. Fiction, Emotion, and the Cinema. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Staiger, J. (1994): Interpreting Films: Studies in the Historical Reception of American Cinema. Princeton: Princeton University.
Staiger, J. (1995): Bad Women: Regulating Sexuality in Early American Cinema. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Staiger, J. (2000): Perverse Spectators. The Practices of Film Reception. New York: New York University.
Staiger, J. (2005): Media Reception Studies. New York: New York University Press.
Stam, R. (2001): Teorías del cine. Una introducción. Barcelona: Paidós.
Stokes, M. y Maltby, R. (1999): American Movie Audiences. From the Turn of the Century to the Early Sound Era. London: British Film Institute.
Walkerdine, V. (1979): School Girl Fictions. London: Verso, 1990.
Žižek, S. (1994a): Todo lo que usted quiso saber de Lacan y nunca se atrevió a preguntarle a Hitchcock. Buenos Aires: Manantial.
Žižek, S. (1994b): ¡Goza tu síntoma!, Jacques Lacan dentro y fuera de Hollywood. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.
Žižek, S. (2000): Mirando al sesgo. Una introducción a Jacques Lacan a través de la cultura popular. Barcelona: Paidós.
Zunzunegui, S. (2005): Los felices sesenta. Aventuras y desventuras del cine español (1959-1971). Barcelona: Paidós.