BookTokers’ Communicative Strategies in the Digital Context of Generation Z in Spain
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4185/rlcs-2026-2682Keywords:
reading, TikTok, Generation Z, Publishing industry, Reading promotion, BookTok, InfluencerAbstract
Introduction: The presence of social media has reshaped young people’s cultural practices, positioning TikTok as a relevant space for the recommendation of cultural content among young audiences, especially within the digital environment associated with Generation Z. In this context, BookTok has emerged as a digital community oriented toward the promotion of reading. This study analyzes the communicative strategies deployed by booktokers to foster reading habits among young people in Spain and their relationship with the perception of literary content. Methodology: The research adopts a descriptive quantitative approach. It combines a content analysis of 662 BookTok videos published in 2024 by booktokers with a survey of 269 users aged 18 to 30. The analysis focuses on formal, narrative, and interactional aspects, as well as on reading habits and audience evaluations. Results: The findings indicate a predominance of short videos, simple aesthetics, and a low degree of commercial explicitness, centered on personal experiences. TikTok has become a relevant channel for book discovery, although visibility does not always translate into actual reading. Discussion: BookTok functions as a space of cultural mediation that articulates recommendation, community belonging, and the circulation of literary trends. Conclusions: TikTok contributes to redefining the mechanisms of reading prescription and reinforces reading as a shared cultural practice in digital environments.
Downloads
References
Andréu, J. (2002). Las técnicas de análisis de contenido: una revisión actualizada. Fundación Centro de Estudios Andaluces.
Asociación de Editores de Madrid. (2025, febrero 27). El sector del libro registra un récord histórico en 2024, según el informe del Mercado del Libro en España 2024. Asociación de Editores de Madrid. https://editoresmadrid.org/el-sector-del-libro-registra-un-record-historico-en-2024-segun-el-informe-mercado-del-libro-en-espana-2024/
Bauer, S. y Tian, F. (2024). Why people use social media: An investigation of engagement on an all-service platform. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2389252. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2389252 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2389252
Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., Flavián, M. y Ibáñez-Sánchez, S. (2021). Understanding influencer marketing: The role of congruence between influencers, products and consumers. Journal of Business Research, 132, 186-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.067 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.067
Berelson, B. (1971). Content Analysis in Communication Research. Macmillan Publishers.
Bernal Torres, C. A. (2016). Metodología de la investigación: administración, economía, humanidades y ciencias sociales. Pearson.
Blanco, A. (2023). BookTok como nueva estrategia de comunicación y promoción de literatura [Tesina]. Universidad de Belgrano. http://repositorio.ub.edu.ar/handle/123456789/10873
Boffone, T. y Jerasa, S. (2021). Toward a (Queer) Reading Community: BookTok, Teen Readers, and the Rise of TikTok Literacies. Talking Points, 33(1), 10-16. https://doi.org/10.58680/tp202131537 DOI: https://doi.org/10.58680/tp202131537
Burgess, J. y Green, J. (2018). YouTube: Online video and participatory culture. Wiley.
Cheong, H. J. y Morrison, M. A. (2008). Consumers’ reliance on product information and recommendations found in UGC. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 8(2), 38-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2008.10722141 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2008.10722141
Cheung, C. M. K. y Thadani, D. R. (2012). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: A literature analysis and integrative model. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 461-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.06.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.06.008
Cuestas, P., Pates, G. y Sáez, V. (2022). El fenómeno booktok y la lectura en pandemia: jóvenes, pantallas, libros y editoriales. Austral Comunicación, 11(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.26422/aucom.2022.1101.pat DOI: https://doi.org/10.26422/aucom.2022.1101.pat
Currenti, M. (2023). TikTok as a Marketing Tool in the Hands of Publishers. Logos, 34(1), 24-37. https://doi.org/10.1163/18784712-03104056 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/18784712-03104056
Dera, J. (2024). BookTok: A Narrative Review of Current Literature and Directions for Future Research. Literature Compass, 21(10-12), e70012. https://doi.org/10.1111/lic3.70012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lic3.70012
Doardi, D. (2021). Entorno digital y generación Z. Teoría de la Educación. Revista Interuniversitaria, 33(2), 27-47. https://doi.org/10.14201/teri.25224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14201/teri.25224
Federación de Gremios de Editores de España (FGEE). (2025). Principales Resultados: Hábitos de Lectura y Compra de Libros en España | 2024. Conecta. https://federacioneditores.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Habitos-de- Lectura-y-Compra-de-Libros-2024-ESPANA_DETALLADO.pdf
García, D. y Salvat, G. (2022). Viralizar la verdad. Factores predictivos del engagement en el contenido verificado en TikTok. El Profesional de la Información, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.mar.10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.mar.10
Guiñez-Cabrera, N. y Mansilla-Obando, K. (2022). Booktokers: Generating and Sharing Book Content on TikTok. Comunicar, 30(71), 113-123. https://doi.org/10.3916/C71-2022-09 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3916/C71-2022-09
Haro-Sosa, G., Moliner-Velázquez, B., Gil-Saura, I. y Fuentes-Blasco, M. (2024). Influence of Electronic Word-Of-Mouth on Restaurant Choice Decisions: Does It Depend on Gender in the Millennial Generation? Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 19(1), 615-632. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer19010033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer19010033
Henning-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G. y Gremier, D. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.10073 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.10073
IAB Spain y Primetag. (2025). Estudio Annual de Influencer Marketing. https://iabspain.es/estudio/influencer-economy-2025-los-datos-del-mercado- sin-filtros-iab-spain/
Instituto Nacional de Estadística (2024). Censo anual de población 2021-2024. https://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Tabla.htm?t=68520
Jenkins, H. (2006). Fans, Bloggers, and Gamers: Exploring Participatory Culture. New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814743690.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814743690.001.0001
Jerasa, S. E. (2025). The #BookTok Connection: Examining Cultural and Linguistic Identity Expression in Online Reading Communities. Education Sciences, 15(2), 234. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020234 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020234
Jerasa, S. y Boffone, T. (2021). BookTok 101: TikTok, Digital Literacies, and Out-of-School Reading Practices. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 65(3), 219-226. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1199 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1199
Jin, J., He, Y., Lin, C. y Diao, L. (2024). How tie strength influences purchasing intention in social recommendation: Evidence from behavioral model and brain activity. Internet Research, 34(6), 2123-2150. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-06-2023-0506 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-06-2023-0506
Katz, E., Gurevitch, M. y Haas, H. (1973). On the Use of the Mass Media for Important Things. American Sociological Review, 38, 164-181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2094393
Krippendorff, K. (2002). Metodología de análisis de contenido. Teoría y práctica. Paidós.
Kumar, S. (2017). Response Styles of Structured Questions in Business Research. Asian Review of Social Sciences, 6(2), 23-28. https://doi.org/10.51983/arss-2017.6.2.1371 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51983/arss-2017.6.2.1371
López, A. J., Cisternas, R., Díez, R. y Cabrera, M. (2023). La interacción del usuario en TikTok: el engagement según la tipología del contenido. Tsafiqui: Revista científica en ciencias sociales, 14(1), 105-117. https://doi.org/10.29019/tsafiqui.v14i22.1200 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29019/tsafiqui.v14i22.1200
López, I. (2024). El Mercado Editorial en España. II Encuentro de Profesionales de la edición y académica Zaragoza 2024. GFK Market Intelligence. https://www.une.es/media/Ignacio_Lopez.pdf
Lou, C. y Yuan, S. (2019). Influencer Marketing: How Message Value and Credibility Affect Consumer Trust of Branded Content on Social Media. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 19(1), 58-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2018.1533501 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2018.1533501
Magadán-Díaz, M. y Rivas-García, J. I. (2022). Emerging business models and digital transition in the Spanish publishing sector. AIB Studi, 62(1), 197-213. https://doi.org/10.2426/aibstudi-13297
Martínez-Estrella, E. C., Samacá-Salamanca, E., García-Rivero, A. y Cifuentes-Ambra, C. (2023). Generation Z in Chile, Colombia, México, and Panama: Interests and new digital consumption habits. Their use of Instagram and TikTok. El Profesional de la información, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.mar.18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.mar.18
Marugán Solís, F. M. y Martín Critikián, D. M. (2022). Redes sociales y Generación Z. Doxa Comunicación, 36. 381-399. https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n36a1707 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n36a1707
Merga, M. K. (2021). How can Booktok on TikTok inform readers’ advisory services for young people? Library & Information Science Research, 43(2), 101091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2021.101091 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2021.101091
Merton, R. K. (1980). Teoría y estructuras sociales. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Meza, R. M., Mogoș, A.-A. y Prundaru, G. (2023). Idols of Promotion and Authenticity on TikTok. Media and Communication, 11(4), 187-202. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i4.7123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i4.7123
Morgan, H. (2024). Using Triangulation and Crystallization to Make Qualitative Studies Trustworthy and Rigorous. The Qualitative Report, 29(7), 1844-1856. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6071 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6071
Nofal, R., Bayram, P., Emeagwali, O. L. y Al-Mu’ani, L. (2022). The Effect of eWOM Source on Purchase Intention: The Moderation Role of Weak-Tie eWOM. Sustainability, 14(16), 9959. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14169959 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14169959
Ooi, K.-B., Lee, V.-H., Hew, J.-J., Leong, L.-Y., Tan, G. W.-H. y Lim, A.-F. (2023). Social media influencers: An effective marketing approach? Journal of Business Research, 160, 113773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113773 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113773
Otzen, T. y Manterola, C. (2017). Técnicas de muestreo sobre una población a estudio. International Journal of Morphology, 35(1), 227-232. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022017000100037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022017000100037
Pastor-Rodríguez, A. y Frutos-Torres, B. D. (2024). Redes sociales principal fuente de información de españoles frente a europeos. Revista ICONO 14. Revista científica de Comunicación y Tecnologías emergentes, 22(2), e2178-e2178. https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v22i2.2178 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v22i2.2178
Rheingold, H. (1993). The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Addison-Wesley.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations. Simon and Schuster.
Roldán Gallego, J. S. y Sánchez Torres, J. (2021). Marketing de influencers en redes sociales. FACE Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, 21(2), 46-67. https://doi.org/10.24054/face.v21i2.1109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24054/01204211.v2.n2.2021.1109
Santa María, L., Rutten, K. y Aliagas-Marín, C. (2024). Youth’s experiences with books: Orientations towards digital spaces of literary socialisation. Poetics, 104, 101892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2024.101892 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2024.101892
Schellewald, A. (2023). Understanding the popularity and affordances of TikTok through user experiences. Media, Culture & Society, 45(8), 1568-1582. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221144562 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221144562
Segarra, J. y Torres, Y. E. (2023). Promoción de libros y fomento de la lectura a través de influencers literarios en TikTok. Ocnos: Revista de Estudios sobre Lectura, 23(2), 2254-9099. https://doi.org/10.18239/ocnos_2024.23.2.479 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18239/ocnos_2024.23.2.479
da Silva, T. A. A., Bezerra, E. L. C., de Brito Silva, M. J. y de Oliveira Campos, P. (2025). Reading in the age of influence: An analysis of the impact of BookTokers on book consumption intentions. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 15(1), 100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-025-01542-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-025-01542-8
TikTok (2025, noviembre 9). Year on TikTok 2024: A little creativity sparks a lot of impact. https://newsroom.tiktok.com/en-us/year-on-tiktok-2024
Vicente, P., Vinader, R. y Soria, M. (2020). Redes sociales al servicio del marketing: análisis comparativo en el caso de Dulceida (España). Revista Espacios, 41(24), 342-358. https://www.revistaespacios.com/a20v41n24/20412428.html
Artículos relacionados
Cueva Estrada, J. M., Sumba Nacipucha, N., Meleán Romero, R., Artigas Morales, W., Cueva Ortiz, N. y Plaza Quimis, M. (2023). Gestión del contenido en redes sociales, por revistas científicas indexadas en SciELO España. Revista de Comunicación de la SEECI, 56, 194-213. https://doi.org/10.15198/seeci.2023.56.e834 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15198/seeci.2023.56.e834
Rivera Magos, S. y González Pureco, G. (2024). Cultura pop y redes sociales como estrategias para conectar con los votantes jóvenes, análisis de la campaña electoral de Movimiento Ciudadano 2024, en México. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 9, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-927 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-927
Saez, V. (2025). Jóvenes que escriben libros para jóvenes: trayectorias, percepciones y producciones de booktokers que publican novelas. Papeles de Trabajo, 19(35). https://revistasacademicas.unsam.edu.ar/index.php/papdetrab/article/view/1992
Yaşa, H. y Birsen, H. (2024). ¿Se puede considerar a los influencers líderes de opinión? Un repaso a los influyentes y los contenidos de las redes sociales. Vivat Academia, 157. https://doi.org/10.15178/va.2024.157.e1545 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15178/va.2024.157.e1545
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Lucía Moreno Tenorio, Belén Puebla-Martínez, Fernando Sánchez-Pita

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.