Online social networks as a communication channel for open access journals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2017-1222Keywords:
online social networks, open access journals, scientific production, digital methods, journals rankings, scrapingAbstract
Scientific knowledge is essential for development; open access journals and online social networks are potential enablers for its access. The objective of this research was to analyze to what extend open access journal are using social media tools as communication channels. Method: from a quantitative approach, 3,448 open access journals indexed on Scopus. Results and conclusions: A) 14.4% of journals has at least one online social network profile linked with its official Website; B) there is a significant difference between the proportion of first quartile journals (Q1) using online social networks and the rest of journals (Q2, Q3 and Q4). First quartile journals also report a larger number of social followers. These results allow us to identify an important opportunity area around using online social networks and open access journals as scientific knowledge disseminator tools.
Downloads
References
Aguado-López, E., Becerril-García, A., Arriola, M. L. & Martínez-Domínguez. (2014): “Iberoamérica en la ciencia de corriente principal (Thomson Reuters/Scopus): una región fragmentada”. Interciencia, 39(8), 570-579. Disponible en el vínculo: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=33931820006
Allen, H. G., Stanton, T. R., Pietro, F. D. & Moseley, G. L. (2013): “Social Media Release Increases Dissemination of Original Articles in the Clinical Pain Sciences”. PLoS One, 8(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068914 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068914
Area-Moreira, M. & Ribeiro-Pessoa, M. T. (2012): “From Solid to Liquid: New Literacies to the Cultural Changes of Web 2.0”. Comunicar, 19(38), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.3916/C38-2012-02-01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3916/C38-2012-02-01
Bernal, C., Frost, J. & Sierra, H. (2014): “Importancia de la gerencia del conocimiento: contrastes entre la teoría y la evidencia empírica”. Estudios Gerenciales, 30(130), 65–72. Disponiblle en el vínculo: https://www.icesi.edu.co/revistas/index.php/estudios_gerenciales/article/view/1766 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.estger.2014.01.011
Bik, H. M. & Goldstein, M. C. (2013): “An Introduction to Social Media for Scientists”. PLOS Biology, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001535 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001535
Castells, M. (2001): “La ciudad de la nueva economía”. Papeles de Población, 7(27), 207-221. Disponible en el vínculo: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=11202708
Darling, E., Shiffman, D., Cȏté, I. & Drew, J. (2013): “The role of Twitter in the life cycle of a scientific publication”. Ideas in Ecology and Evolution, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.16v1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4033/iee.2013.6.6.f
DOAJ. (s/f): “Directory of Open Access Journals”. Disponible en el vínculo: https://doaj.org (Consultado el 28/05/2017)
Drucker, P. F. (1998): La sociedad postcapitalista. Barcelona: Ediciones Apóstrofe.
Estefanía, J. (1996): La Nueva Economia: La globalizacion. Madrid: Debate Editorial.
Eysenbach, G. (2008): “Medicine 2.0: Social Networking, Collaboration, Participation, Apomediation, and Openness”. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1030
Gul, S., Shah, T. A. & Nisa, N. T. (2014): “Emerging Web 2.0 applications in open access scholarly journals in the field of agriculture and food sciences”. Library Review, 63(8/9), 670–683. https://doi.org/10.1108/LR-05-2013-0060 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/LR-05-2013-0060
Hall, W., De Roure, D. & Shadbolt, N. (2009): “The evolution of the Web and implications for eResearch”. Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 367(1890), 991–1001. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0252 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0252
Haustein, S., Peters, I., Sugimoto, C. R., Thelwall, M. & Larivière, V. (2014): “Tweeting biomedicine: An analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(4), 656–669. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23101
Holmberg, K., & Thelwall, M. (2014): “Disciplinary differences in Twitter scholarly communication”. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1027–1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1229-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1229-3
Lavis, J. N., Robertson, D., Woodside, J. M., McLeod, C. B. & Abelson, J. (2003): “How Can Research Organizations More Effectively Transfer Research Knowledge to Decision Makers?”. The Milbank Quarterly, 81(2), 221–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00052
Lawrence, S. (s/f): “Free online availability substantially increases a paper’s impact”. Disponible en el vínculo: http://www.nature.com/nature/debates/e-access/Articles/lawrence.html (Consultado el 28/05/2017)
Marres, N. & Weltevrede, E. (2013): “Scraping the Social?”. Journal of Cultural Economy, 6(3), 313–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2013.772070 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2013.772070
Max Planck Society. (2003): “Berlin Declaration”. Disponible en el vínculo: https://openaccess.mpg.de/Berlin-Declaration (Consultado el 29/05/2017)
Morrison, H. (2009): “Introduction. En Scholarly Communication for Librarians”. Chandos Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-84334-488-9.50016-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-84334-488-9.50016-0
Nazim, M. & Husain, S. (2013): “Analysis of Open Access Scholarly Journals in Media & Communication”. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 33(5), 405-411. Disponible en el vínculo: http://eprints.rclis.org/31228/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.33.5106
Open Society Institute. (2002): “Budapest Open Access Initiative”. Disponible en el vínculo: http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read (Consultado el 25/05/2017)
Osterrieder, A. (2013): “The value and use of social media as communication tool in the plant sciences”. Plant Methods, 9(26). https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4811-9-26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4811-9-26
Procter, R., Williams, R., Stewart, J., Poschen, M., Snee, H., Voss, A. & Asgari-Targhi, M. (2010): “Adoption and use of Web 2.0 in scholarly communications”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 368(1926), 4039–4056. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0155 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0155
Rheingold, H. (2004): Multitudes inteligentes: la próxima revolución social. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Rogers, R. (2015): “Digital Methods for Web Research”. En: Scott, R. & Kosslyn, S. (Eds.), Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: An Interdisciplinary, Searchable, and Linkable Resource (pp. 1–22). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Disponible en el vínculo: http://www.govcom.org/publications/full_list/etrds0076.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0076
Rosenstreich, D. & Wooliscroft, B. (2012): “Assessing international journal impact: the case of marketing”. European Business Review, 24(1), 58–87. https://doi.org/10.1108/09555341211191553 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09555341211191553
Rúas-Araújo, J., Campos-Freire, F. & Puentes-Rivera, I. (2016): “Utilización y valoración de las redes sociales generalistas y buscadores bibliográficos en las universidades gallegas”. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 71, 1187-1207. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2016-1141 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2016-1141
Salvador-Oliván, J. A. & Agustín-Lacruz, C. (2015): “Correlación entre indicadores bibliométricos en revistas de web of science y Scopus”. Revista General de Información y Documentación, 25(2), 341-359. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_RGID.2015.v25.n2.51241 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_RGID.2015.v25.n2.51241
Scimago (s/f): “Scimago Journal & Country Rank”. Disponible en el vínculo: http://scimagojr.com/ (Consultado el 28/05/2017)
Scopus (s/f). “CiteScore metrics for serials”. Disponible en el vínculo: https://www.scopus.com/sources (Consultado el 28/05/2017)
Suárez, A. (2001): Nueva economía y nueva sociedad: los grandes desafíos del siglo XXI. Madrid: Pearson Educación.
Tapscott, D. (1997): Digital Economy: Promise and Peril in the Age of Networked Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Valerio, G. & González, J. R. V. (2011): “Contactos de redes sociales en línea como repositorios de información”. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 8(1), 128–155. http://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v8i1.948 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v8i1.948
Wolfensohn, J. D. (2000): “Development and international cooperation in the twenty-first century : the role of information technology in the context of a knowledge-based global economy (ECOSOC) by James D. Wolfensohn, President (No. 101432) (pp. 1–9)”. The World Bank. Disponible en el vínculo: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/519081467994605225/Development-and-international-cooperation-in-the-twenty-first-century-the-role-of-information-technology-in-the-context-of-a-knowledge-based-global-economy-ECOSOC-by-James-D-Wolfensohn-President